Füsun Taşkın1, Yasemin Polat1, İbrahim H Erdoğdu2, Figen T Türkdoğan1, Veli Suha Öztürk1, Serdar Özbaş3. 1. Department of Radiology Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey. 2. Department of Pathology Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey. 3. Department of Breast-Endocrine Surgery Güven Hospital Breast Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the findings and results from breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for problem-solving purposes due to inconclusive conventional imaging findings. METHODS: Imaging findings, biopsy and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated for breast MRI performed for problem-solving purposes at our department between January 2011 and December 2016 for cases whose mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasonography findings were inconclusive. RESULTS: Lesions were identified in 414 of 986 problem-solving MRI examinations, and 13.3% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. A total of 124 lesions were additionally found by MRI, and 9.7% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. MRI produced false-negative results in four cases. In cases whose conventional imaging methods yielded indefinite results, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 96.3%, 83%, 99.3%, and 46.5%, respectively. For the additional lesions identified, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 91.7%, 69%, 98.7%, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI is a reliable problem-solving method for excluding malignancy that cannot be confirmed by conventional imaging. In such cases, additional findings from MRI may help identify new cancers that cannot be detected with conventional methods. However, it has moderately low specificity which may cause unnecessary biopsies, follow-ups, and anxiety to patients.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the findings and results from breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for problem-solving purposes due to inconclusive conventional imaging findings. METHODS: Imaging findings, biopsy and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated for breast MRI performed for problem-solving purposes at our department between January 2011 and December 2016 for cases whose mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasonography findings were inconclusive. RESULTS: Lesions were identified in 414 of 986 problem-solving MRI examinations, and 13.3% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. A total of 124 lesions were additionally found by MRI, and 9.7% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. MRI produced false-negative results in four cases. In cases whose conventional imaging methods yielded indefinite results, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 96.3%, 83%, 99.3%, and 46.5%, respectively. For the additional lesions identified, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 91.7%, 69%, 98.7%, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI is a reliable problem-solving method for excluding malignancy that cannot be confirmed by conventional imaging. In such cases, additional findings from MRI may help identify new cancers that cannot be detected with conventional methods. However, it has moderately low specificity which may cause unnecessary biopsies, follow-ups, and anxiety to patients.
Authors: Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-11-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Caitlin V McCowan; Duncan Salmon; Jingzhe Hu; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Nicholas Whiting; Jennifer S Davis; Daniel D Carson; Niki M Zacharias; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Mary C Farach-Carson Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-01