Literature DB >> 30211379

Clinical and Functional Outcomes: Primary Constrained Condylar Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Posterior Stabilized Knee Arthroplasty.

Ken Lee Puah1, Hwei Chi Chong1, Leon Siang Shen Foo1, Ngai-Nung Lo1, Seng-Jin Yeo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses are commonly used in difficult primary total knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty. We postulate that the use of CCK prostheses in primary knee arthroplasty may result in decreased range of motion but with better patient-reported functional scores compared with primary posterior stabilized (PS) knee prostheses because of increased varus and valgus stability from increased constraint.
METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using prospectively collected data on functional outcome scores and range of motion preoperatively and at 6 months and at 2 years. Thirty-eight patients with primary CCK arthroplasty were matched with 38 patients with primary PS knee arthroplasty treated by a single surgeon. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Analysis was done using the independent t-test.
RESULTS: Total 76 patients with 61 (80.3%) female patients, 30 (39.5%) left knees, and 9 (11.8%) valgus knees. There was no significant difference in preoperative age (CCK arthroplasty 70.7 ± 6.0 years versus PS knee arthroplasty 68.5 ± 5.2 years; P < 0.085), body mass index (27.2 ± 4.4 versus 26.3 ± 5.2; P < 0.44), Oxford Knee Score (35.8 ± 7.8 versus 36.0 ± 7.6; P < 0.92), and Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form (SF-36) scores and knee extension (8.0° ± 6.7° versus 7.7° ± 7.6°; P < 0.84). There was no significant difference in preoperative knee flexion (106.0° ± 22.9° versus 117.3° ± 20.1°; P < 0.026). There was no significant difference in 6-month knee extension (4.5° ± 6.8° versus 4.1° ± 4.5°; P < 0.80), knee flexion (110.5° ± 15.8° versus 110.9° ± 15.5°; P < 0.92), Oxford Knee Score (18.9° ± 3.4° versus 20.1° ± 5.3°; P < 0.27), and SF-36 scores. There was no significant difference in 2-year knee extension (1.8° ± 5.7° versus 1.5° ± 4.0°; P < 0.82), knee flexion (111.3° ± 13.6° versus 115.0° ± 16.5°; P < 0.30), Oxford Knee Score (18.5° ± 3.7° versus 18.2° ± 4.2°; P < 0.77), and SF-36 scores.
CONCLUSION: The use of CCK prostheses in primary knee arthroplasty gives similar clinical and functional outcomes at 2 years as those of PS knee prostheses, despite increased constraint.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211379      PMCID: PMC6132316          DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev        ISSN: 2474-7661


  22 in total

1.  Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: when and what?

Authors:  James P McAuley; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Five year survivorship of primary non-modular stemless constrained knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Allison Ruel; Philippe Ortiz; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Results of a second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Does a non-stemmed constrained condylar prosthesis predispose to early failure of primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajit J Deshmukh; Parthiv A Rathod; Michael J Moses; Nimrod Snir; Scott E Marwin; Alan J Dayan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Total condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  W F Donaldson; T P Sculco; J N Insall; C S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Survival of primary condylar-constrained total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 7 years.

Authors:  Lance M Maynard; Timothy J Sauber; Vasileios K Kostopoulos; Gregory S Lavigne; Jeffrey J Sewecke; Nicholas G Sotereanos
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Update on the etiology of revision TKA -- Evident trends in a retrospective survey of 1449 cases.

Authors:  Tilman Calliess; Max Ettinger; Natalie Hülsmann; Sven Ostermeier; Henning Windhagen
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Feng; Cao Yang; De-Hao Fu; Shu-Nan Ye; Xian-Zhe Liu; Zhe Chen; Saroj Rai; Shu-Hua Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

9.  Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Cholewinski; S Putman; L Vasseur; H Migaud; A Duhamel; H Behal; G Pasquier
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Ten-Year Results of Primary and Revision Condylar-Constrained Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Coronal Plane Instability.

Authors:  Andrea Camera; Stefano Biggi; Gabriele Cattaneo; Giovanni Brusaferri
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-08-31
View more
  6 in total

1.  Primary constrained-condylar-knee designs outperform posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining designs in high-grade varus osteoarthritic knees during short-term follow-up: a pilot study.

Authors:  William Colyn; J Neirynck; E Vanlommel; L Bruckers; J Bellemans
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Mid-level constraint may correct coronal plane imbalance without compromising patient function in patients with severe osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J A Dubin; G H Westrich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-24

Review 3.  Is varus-valgus constraint a reliable option in complex primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Francesco Falez; Fabrizio Mocini; Peter K Sculco; Giulio Maccauro; Ivan De Martino
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-06

4.  Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Ivan De Martino; Aaron Burrofato; Carmine De Ieso; Maristella F Saccomanno; Giulio Maccauro; Vincenzo De Santis
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-12-02

5.  Varus-valgus constrained insert with posterior-stabilized femoral components in complex primary total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Afton K Limberg; Cody C Wyles; Michael J Taunton; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-11

6.  Good to excellent long-term survival of a single-design condylar constrained knee arthroplasty for primary and revision surgery.

Authors:  J Schwarze; T Schmidt-Braekling; C Theil; G Gosheger; L Poggenpohl; T Ackmann; B Moellenbeck; H Ahrens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.