| Literature DB >> 30211152 |
Qingyan Zhang1, Qu Zhou1,2, Zhaorui Lu1, Zhijie Wei1, Lingna Xu1, Yingang Gui1.
Abstract
Tin oxide SnO2-based gas sensors have been widely used for detecting typical fault characteristic gases extracted from power transformer oil, namely, H2, CO, CO2, CH4, C2H2, C2H4, and C2H6, due to the remarkable advantages of high sensitivity, fast response, long-term stability, and so on. Herein, we present an overview of the recent significant improvement in fabrication and application of high performance SnO2-based sensors for detecting these fault characteristic gases. Promising materials for the sensitive and selective detection of each kind of fault characteristic gas have been identified. Meanwhile, the corresponding sensing mechanisms of SnO2-based gas sensors of these fault characteristic gases are comprehensively discussed. In the final section of this review, the major challenges and promising developments in this domain are also given.Entities:
Keywords: fault characteristic gases; gas sensors; power transformer oil; sensing mechanism; sensing properties; tin oxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 30211152 PMCID: PMC6123357 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Comparison of the representative SnO2 based sensors for fault characteristic gases extracted from power transformer oil.
| H2 | 1 wt% Co-doped SnO2 | Electrospinning | Nanofibers | 100–25,000 | 330 | 24/100 | H2 > CO | Liu et al., |
| 1 mol% Au-doped SnO2 | Sol-gel | Nanoparticles | 1–5,000 | 400 | 48/5,000 | H2>CO | Yin and Tao, | |
| Pd-decorated SnO2 | Chemical vapor deposition | Nanowires | 10–100 | 350 | 7.1/100 | H2>CO2 | Nguyen et al., | |
| CO | 1.5% Pd-doped SnO2 | Co-precipitation | Thick-film | 100–1,000 | 260 | 6.59/400 | – | Chen et al., |
| ZnO–SnO2 nanoparticles | Typical hydrothermal | Nanoparticles | 40–160 | 300 | 13/100 | – | Chen et al., | |
| Au@SnO2 | Hydrothermal deposition | Yolk–shell nanospheres | 5–100 | 210 | 30/50 | CO>H2>C2H4>CO2 | Wang et al., | |
| CO2 | LaFeO3/SnO2 | Sol-gel | Thick film | – | 250 | 2.72/4,000 | – | Zhang et al., |
| LaOCl-doped SnO2 | One-step electrospinning | Nanofibers | 100–20,000 | 300 | 3.7/1,000 | – | Xiong et al., | |
| CH4 | 20 mol% Pt-SnO2 | Electrospinning | Nanofibers | 1–1,000 | 350 | 1.11/1 | – | Lu et al., |
| Pt-SnO2 | Wet chemical | Thin film | 1000–10,000 | 400 | 1.55/1,000 | – | Min and Choi, | |
| C2H2 | Sm2O3-doped SnO2 | Sol–gel | Nanoparticles | 1–5,000 | 180 | 63.8/1,000 | C2H2>CO>CH4>H2 | Qi et al., |
| rGO-Loaded SnO2 | Hydrothermal | Nanoparticles | 0.5–500 | 180 | 12.4/50 | C2H2>CH4>H2>CO>CO2 | Jin et al., | |
| C2H4 | silicalite-1 layer coated on SnO2 | Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis technique | Thin film | 2–70 | 350 | 2.21/8 | – | Jadsadapattarakul et al., |
| SnO2 | R.F. magnetron sputtering | Thin film | 10–100 | 300 | 10.43/100 | – | Ahn et al., | |
| C2H6 | 5 wt% Pd-doped SnO2 | Hydrothermal | Nanoparticles | 5–100 | 400 | 5.89/100 | – | Chen et al., |