Literature DB >> 30211030

Cardiac balanced steady-state free precession MRI at 0.35 T: a comparison study with 1.5 T.

Shams Rashid1, Fei Han1, Yu Gao1,2, Kyunghyun Sung1,2, Minsong Cao2,3, Yingli Yang2,3, Peng Hu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While low-field MRI is disadvantaged by a reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to higher fields, it has a number of useful features such as decreased SAR and shorter T1, and has shown promise for diagnostic imaging. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cardiac balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) MRI at 0.35 T and compares cardiac bSSFP MRI images at 0.35 T with those at 1.5 T.
METHODS: Cardiac images were acquired in 7 healthy volunteers using an ECG-gated bSSFP cine sequence on a 0.35 T superconducting MR system as well as a clinical 1.5 T system. Blood and myocardium SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed. Subjective image scoring was used to compare the image quality between 0.35 and 1.5 T.
RESULTS: Cardiac images at 0.35 T were successfully acquired in all volunteers. While the 0.35 T images were noisier than those at 1.5 T, blood, myocardium and papillary muscles could be clearly delineated. At 0.35 T, bSSFP images were acquired at flip angles as high as 150°. Maximum CNR was achieved at 130°. Image quality scoring showed that while at lower flip angles, the 0.35 T images had poorer quality than the 1.5 T, but with flip angles of 110 and 130, the image quality at 0.35 T had scores similar to those at 1.5 T.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cardiac bSSFP imaging is highly feasible at 0.35 T.

Entities:  

Keywords:  0.35 T; Low-field MRI; balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP); cardiac MRI

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211030      PMCID: PMC6127526          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.08.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  23 in total

1.  MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  J Barkhausen; S G Ruehm; M Goyen; T Buck; G Laub; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology.

Authors:  J Paul Finn; Kambiz Nael; Vibhas Deshpande; Osman Ratib; Gerhard Laub
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using an open 0.35 T system.

Authors:  Hans-Martin Klein; Werner Meyners; Benjamin Neeb; Joachim Labenz; Karl-Heinz Truümmler
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of implanted deep brain stimulators: experience in a large series.

Authors:  Paul S Larson; R Mark Richardson; Philip A Starr; Alastair J Martin
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping.

Authors:  Kelvin Chow; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Jordin D Green; Joseph J Pagano; Matthias G Friedrich; Richard B Thompson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; T H Foster; R E Argersinger; L M Pfeifer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance Sequences and Rapid Acquisition for MR-Guided Interventions.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Anthony Z Faranesh; Robert J Lederman; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Dynamic MR in patients affected by neurogenical claudication: technique and results from a single-center experience.

Authors:  Mario Muto; Francesco Giurazza; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Rossana Senese; Emiliano Schena; Fabio Zeccolini; Alvaro Diano
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Feasibility of Polestar N20, an ultra-low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system in resection control of pituitary macroadenomas: lessons learned from the first 40 cases.

Authors:  Ruediger Gerlach; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Thomas Gasser; Gerhard Marquardt; Juergen Reusch; Lioba Imoehl; Volker Seifert
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  7 in total

1.  Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Matthew C Restivo; Ipshita Bhattacharya; Burcu Basar; Daniel A Herzka; Michael S Hansen; Toby Rogers; W Patricia Bandettini; Delaney R McGuirt; Christine Mancini; David Grodzki; Rainer Schneider; Waqas Majeed; Himanshu Bhat; Hui Xue; Joel Moss; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Alan P Koretsky; Peter Kellman; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A revisit of the k-space filtering effects of magnetization-prepared 3D FLASH and balanced SSFP acquisitions: Analytical characterization of the point spread functions.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Qin Qin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Feasibility of MR fingerprinting using a high-performance 0.55 T MRI system.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Yun Jiang; Gregor Körzdörfer; Mathias Nittka; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.130

4.  A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T.

Authors:  W Patricia Bandettini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Christine Mancini; Delaney R McGuirt; Peter Kellman; Hui Xue; Jennifer L Henry; Margaret Lowery; Swee Lay Thein; Marcus Y Chen; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Current landscape and future perspectives in preclinical MR and PET imaging of brain metastasis.

Authors:  Synnøve Nymark Aasen; Heidi Espedal; Olivier Keunen; Tom Christian Holm Adamsen; Rolf Bjerkvig; Frits Thorsen
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 6.  Sustainable low-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance in changing healthcare systems.

Authors:  Cathy Qin; Sanjana Murali; Elsa Lee; Vaishnavi Supramaniam; Derek J Hausenloy; Johnes Obungoloch; Joanna Brecher; Rongyu Lin; Hao Ding; Theophilus N Akudjedu; Udunna C Anazodo; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Orlando P Simonetti; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Thoralf Niendorf; Regina Mammen; Sola Adeleke
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

7.  Efficient spiral in-out and EPI balanced steady-state free precession cine imaging using a high-performance 0.55T MRI.

Authors:  Matthew C Restivo; Rajiv Ramasawmy; W Patricia Bandettini; Daniel A Herzka; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.737

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.