| Literature DB >> 30210648 |
Eszter M Horváth1,2, Rita Magenheim3, Nóra J Béres2,4, Rita Benkő1,2, Tamás Pék2,5, Ádám G Tabák3,6, Csaba Szabo7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative-nitrative stress and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activation have been previously observed in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies, and they were also linked to the development of metabolic diseases. The aim of the present study was to examine these parameters and their correlation to known metabolic risk factors following healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30210648 PMCID: PMC6126058 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1743253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Immunostaining of leukocyte smears. (a) Representative microscopic image of leukocyte smears stained against nitrotyrosine. Black-colored precipitate indicates the diffuse labeling. Magenta-colored NFR served as counterstain. Black-colored arrows show positively stained cells. (b) Photograph of smear immunolabeled with anti-PAR antibody. Black color represents positive nuclear staining. Counterstaining was NFR. Red arrows point on positive leukocytes.
Characteristics of participants at follow-up (∗: p ≤ 0.05 versus previous healthy pregnancy, #: p ≤ 0.05 versus men, ł: p ≤ 0.05 versus nulliparous women, ^: p ≤ 0.05 versus DGDM). Mean ± SEM, Median (IQR). MALE: men; NULL: nulliparous women; PREG: previous healthy pregnancy; DGDM: previous diet-treated GDM; IGDM: previous insulin-treated GDM.
| MALE | NULL | PREG | DGDM | IGDM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 35.7 ± 0.9 | 34.0 ± 0.5 | 34.1 ± 0.8 | 35.2 ± 0.7 | 36.8 ± 1.7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27 ± 0.6 | 24.2 ± 1.4 | 23.6 ± 0.6 | 26.3 ± 1.0 | 24.6 ± 1.3 |
| Parity | 0 | 1 (1-2) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1-2) | |
| Level of education (1–4) | 4 (3-4) | 4 (3.5–4) | 4 (3-4) | 4 (3-4) | 3 (3–3)∗#ł^ |
| Income per capita (1–5) | 3 (2–4) | 3.5 (2.5–5) | 2 (2-3)ł | 2 (2-3)ł | 1 (1-2)∗#ł^ |
| Smoking (%) | 46.7 ł^ | 5.9 | 22.2 | 10.5 | 30.8 |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | |||||
| 0 min | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.2 |
| 30 min | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 8.8 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.3# | 9.0 ± 0.3∗ | 9.2 ± 0.6 |
| 90 min | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.3∗ | 8.3 ± 0.9∗ ł |
| 120 min | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.3∗#ł | 7.1 ± 0.8∗#ł |
| Insulin (U/ml) | |||||
| 0 min | 9.6 (4.7–10.9) | 7.6 (3.7–10.6) | 8.1 (4.5–10.1) | 9.9 (7.2–14.4) | 10.1 (4.6–15.3) |
| 30 min | 46.7 (35.2–96.2) | 54.5 (22.8–77.7) | 51.5 (30.3–67.8) | 55.6 (38.9–79.0) | 33.0 (22.6–86.9) |
| 90 min | 53.5 (32.9–106.8) | 38.1 (21.6–55.5) | 32.2 (22.9–46.0) | 72.0 (38.5–97.1)∗ | 58.0 (31.5–103.0) |
| 120 min | 33.9 (6.4–65.2) | 28.5 (16.0–50.0) | 25.1 (14.1–38.6) | 56.4 (37.1–84.8)∗# | 45.7 (26.1–86.8) |
| Prediabetes (IGT + IFG) + Diabetes (%) | 6.7 + 0 6.7 | 12.5 + 0 12.5 | 4 + 0 4 | 33.3 + 0 33.3∗ | 30 + 10 40∗ |
| HOMA2B (%) | 84.5 (73.5–99.6) | 87.1 (67.6–97.7) | 82.4 (61.8–117.2) | 98.6 (80.0–130.0) | 113.0 (67.4–151.9) |
| HOMA2S (%) | 76.6 (69.5–149.8) | 81.7 (69.8–189.5) | 94.0 (66.4–150.0) | 75.4 (51.3–104.5) | 67.1 (50.9–128.1) |
| EIR | 8.0 (5.0–15.5) | 8.8 (3.5–13.1) | 8.4 (4.5–10.9) | 7.9 (5.8–10.4) | 4.6 (1.9–14.3) |
| AUC glucose | 1210.9 ± 122.7 | 1065.4 ± 42.3 | 1011.2 ± 37.5 | 1257.9 ± 40.0∗ | 1310.1 ± 111.3∗ |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.1 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 0.9 (0.3–1.9) | 0.6 (0.1–1.2) | 1.5 (0.3–2.2) | 1.1 (0.8–3.9)ł | 1.5 (0.4–4.9) |
| Vitamin D3 (ng/ml) | 23.9 ± 1 | 23.0 ± 2.4 | 25.2 ± 1.8 | 25.9 ± 1.8 | 28.7 ± 3.5 |
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 21.4 (19.0–28.2) | 109.7 (66.5–224.6)# | 75.4 (41.1–106.3)# | 111.9 (36.9–158.2)# | 82.3 (22.5–95.3) |
Level of education: 1: primary school; 2: secondary school; 3: secondary grammar school; 4: college or university degree. Monthly income per capita: 1: below 185€; 2: 185–370€; 3: 370–555€; 4: 555–740€; 5: over 740€. IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; IFG: impaired fasting glucose.
Figure 2Pre- and postload values of ON stress and PARP activation markers in the study groups. (a) Plasma total peroxide. In the fasting state, all previously pregnant groups had significantly increased plasma total peroxide level compared to men and nulliparas. The two-hour postload value of this parameter was similar to that seen in the fasting state. The between-group differences in postload levels were also similar to those found in the fasting state; however, only the DGDM and IGDM groups were significantly different from nulliparas. (b) Protein tyrosine nitration in circulating mononuclear cells. There was no significant between-group difference of protein nitration neither in the fasting nor in the postload state. On the other hand, the postload values were significantly higher compared to the fasting state. (c) Protein PARylation in circulating mononuclear cells. Similar changes can be observed in the case of protein PARylation that was observed regarding protein nitration. In the boxplot, the central line shows the median; the box represents the interquartile range; and the whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey post hoc test. ###: p < 0.001 versus MALE; ł: p < 0.05 versus NULL; łł: p < 0.01 versus NULL; łłł: p < 0.001 versus NULL; a: p < 0.05 preload versus postload.
Potential predictors of plasma total peroxide level based on multiple linear regression with log-transformed plasma total peroxide as the outcome. To investigate the association between gender, previous pregnancy, previous GDM, GDM severity, and ON stress, a set of multiple linear regression models were built with the individual addition of dummy coded grouping variables as predictors. For the final model, only statistically significant terms were retained. Model 1: adjusted for female sex; Model 2: Model 1 + previous pregnancy; Model 3: Model 2 + previous GDM; Model 4: Model 3 + previous insulin treatment; Model 5: Model 4 with the removal of the nonsignificant GDM term. Female sex was associated with increased oxidative stress (Model 1) that was abolished by including previous pregnancy into the model (Model 2). Previous GDM did not have additional elevating effect on plasma total peroxide level upon previous healthy pregnancy (Model 3); however, previous insulin treatment itself had a positive additional impact on oxidative stress (Model 5).
| Independent variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 0.75 ∗∗ (0.15) | 0.29 (0.73) | 0.29 (0.17) | 0.29 (0.17) | 0.29 (0.17) |
| Pregnancy | 0.57 ∗∗∗ (0.13) | 0.43 ∗∗ (0.15) | 0.43 ∗∗ (0.15) | 0.52 ∗∗∗ (0.13) | |
| Previous GDM | 0.207 (0.12) | 0.15 (0.12) | |||
| Previous insulin treatment | 0.30 (0.18) | 0.36 ∗ (0.17) | |||
|
| 0.241 | 0.385 | 0.408 | 0.430 | 0.419 |
Independent variable: log plasma total peroxide, n = 81, values are estimated effect sizes: B (SE), (∗: p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001).
Effect of OGTT and grouping variables on protein nitration and PARP activation according to mixed models with fixed effects. Difference in ON stress between the fasting and the postload state was assessed by the inclusion of the interaction between time (index) and the given predictors. As the same subjects were observed at two time points, observations are not independent (they are clustered within individuals), thus fixed-effects hierarchical linear specification was used. Both nitrative stress and PARP activity increase by the 2nd hour of the OGTT due to the glucose load (index). In case of tyrosine nitration, previous insulin treatment during index pregnancy significantly decreases the increment (index ∗ previous insulin treatment). PARP activation is not altered by the grouping variables.
| Independent variable | log NT | log PAR |
|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | ||
| Index | 0.33∗∗∗ (0.085) | 0.37∗∗ (0.13) |
| Previous insulin treatment | 0.08 (0.43) | |
| Index ∗ previous insulin treatment | −0.65∗∗ (0.28) |
N = 86 and 84, respectively. Values are estimated effect sizes: B (SE) (∗: p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001).
Effect of OGTT, grouping variables, and clinical variables on plasma total peroxide level according to mixed models with fixed effects. To explore the potential associations between the identified grouping variable predictors to the changes in plasma total peroxide level in women, the mixed model was also adjusted for those variables and for their time interactions that were independent predictors of fasting plasma total peroxide level (CRP) or univariately related (Pearson correlation) to the change in plasma total peroxide level during OGTT (HbA1c). Including all independent determinants of plasma total peroxide level and parameters that show correlation with the change of the total peroxide level after glucose load showed that only HbA1c acts as independent determinant for change in plasma total peroxide level (index ∗ HbA1c).
| Independent variable | Estimate | Sig. |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 6.11 (0.58) | 0.000 |
| Previous pregnancy | 0.40 (0.13) | 0.004 |
| Previous insulin treatment | 0.32 (0.17) | 0.058 |
| logCRP | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.015 |
| HbA1c | −0.03 (0.10) | 0.743 |
| Index | 0.96 (0.03) | 0.002 |
| Index ∗ HbA1c | −0.15 (0.05) | 0.004 |
| Index ∗ logCRP | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.194 |
| Index ∗ previous pregnancy | −0.08 (0.07) | 0.234 |
| Index ∗ previous insulin treatment | −0.09 (0.08) | 0.274 |
Dependent variable: log peroxide. N = 61. Values are estimated effect sizes: B (SE) (Although in the table the parameter estimate of index is positive and statistically significant, it does not mean that peroxide level actually increased between the two time points, as it refers to the counterfactual case when all interaction parameters are zero).