| Literature DB >> 30210642 |
Ketevan Mazmishvili1, Kumar Jayant2, Nona Janikashvili1, Nino Kikodze1, Malkhaz Mizandari3, Ia Pantsulaia1, Natela Paksashvili1,3, Mikael H Sodergren2, Isabella Reccia2, Madhava Pai2, Nagy Habib2, Tinatin Chikovani1.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatic cancer is a highly lethal tumour with increasing worldwide incidence. These tumours are characterized by the proliferation of malignant cells, generalised immunosuppression and chronic inflammation marked with an increase in inflammatory markers as a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and overexpression of CD4+CD39+ on T lymphocytes. The studies have outlined immunomodulatory changes in liver cancer patients as the plausible explanation for the better survival. The aim of this pilot study was understand the possible immunomodulatory effect of radiofrequency (RF) energy and liver resection (non-radiofrequency based devices; non-RF device) in relation to NLR, PLR and expression of CD4+CD39+ T lymphocytes and compare the magnitude of these changes. Material andEntities:
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Immunomodulation; Radiofrequency ablation; liver cancer; liver resection
Year: 2018 PMID: 30210642 PMCID: PMC6134816 DOI: 10.7150/jca.25084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1The widely accepted Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system stating treatment options according to cancer stage, degree of liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh Score) and performance status (PS); CLT: Cadaveric liver transplant; LDLT: Living donor liver transplant.
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients in the Study Groups
| Parameters | Radiofrequency Ablation | Liver Resection (non-RF device) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age(years) ± SD | 55.1±11.2 | 58.6±8.1 | >0.05 |
| No. male/female | 4/3 | 5/5 | >0.05 |
| Primary tumours | 1 | 5 | >0.05 |
| Secondary tumours | 6 | 5 | >0.05 |
| HBsAg-positive, n (%) | 1 (14.2%) | 1 (10.0%) | >0.05 |
| Anti HCV-positive n (%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (20%) | |
| Tumour size (mm) ± SD | 22.4±5.6mm | 47.6±23mm | <0.05 |
| Treatment | 7 (41.10%) | 10 (58.80%) | >0.05 |
| Localization | 5R, 1L, 1L/R | 7R, 3L | |
| Complication | Hydrodissection (4) | Haemorrhage(1) | >0.05 |
Statistical significance was analyzed by the Mc Nemar Test
Statistical significance was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test
Statistical significance was analyzed by the Wilcoxon's matched pairs signed rank test
Figure 2Decreased NLR and PLR in the patients who were treated with RFA (Radiofrequency ablation)
Paired comparison of NLR, PLR and CD39+ in the Study Groups
| Parameters | NLR | P value | PLR | P value | CD39+ | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before RFA | 4.7±3.3 | p=0.283 | 140.5±79.5 | p=0.386 | 55.8±13.8 | p=0.03 |
| After RFA | 3.8±1.8 | 137±69.2 | 24.6±21.1 | |||
| Before LR | 3.5±2.8 | p=0.183 | 116±42.2 | p=0.391 | 47.6±8.8 | p=0.38 |
| After LR | 4.5±3.2 | 120.8±29 | 55.7±33.2 |
Statistical significance was analyzed by the Wilcoxon's matched pairs signed rank test
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
Platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
CD39+ (CD39+CD4 T Lymphocytes)
Figure 3The percentage of CD39+CD4+ cells in total CD4+ T cells was decreased after RFA, but was not modified after LR.