Wei Li1, Xuexiang Wang2, Yuwei Zhang1, Xubin Li1, Qian Li1, Zhaoxiang Ye1. 1. Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Tianjin Hongqiao Hospital, Tianjin 300130, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences among preinvasive lesions, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs) and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPAs) based on radiomic feature analysis with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 109 patients with ground-glass opacity lesions (GGOs) in the lungs determined by CT examinations were enrolled, all of whom had received a pathologic diagnosis. After the manual delineation and segmentation of the GGOs as regions of interest (ROIs), the patients were subdivided into three groups based on pathologic analyses: the preinvasive lesions (including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ) subgroup, the MIA subgroup and the IPA subgroup. Next, we obtained the texture features of the GGOs. The data analysis was aimed at finding both the differences between each pair of the groups and predictors to distinguish any two pathologic subtypes using logistic regression. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to accurately evaluate the performances of the regression models. RESULTS: We found that the voxel count feature (P<0.001) could be used as a predictor for distinguishing IPAs from preinvasive lesions. However, the surface area feature (P=0.040) and the extruded surface area feature (P=0.013) could be predictors of IPAs compared with MIAs. In addition, the correlation feature (P=0.046) could distinguish preinvasive lesions from MIAs better. CONCLUSIONS: Preinvasive lesions, MIAs and IPAs can be discriminated based on texture features within CT images, although the three diseases could all appear as GGOs on CT images. The diagnoses of these three diseases are very important for clinical surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences among preinvasive lesions, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs) and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPAs) based on radiomic feature analysis with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 109 patients with ground-glass opacity lesions (GGOs) in the lungs determined by CT examinations were enrolled, all of whom had received a pathologic diagnosis. After the manual delineation and segmentation of the GGOs as regions of interest (ROIs), the patients were subdivided into three groups based on pathologic analyses: the preinvasive lesions (including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ) subgroup, the MIA subgroup and the IPA subgroup. Next, we obtained the texture features of the GGOs. The data analysis was aimed at finding both the differences between each pair of the groups and predictors to distinguish any two pathologic subtypes using logistic regression. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to accurately evaluate the performances of the regression models. RESULTS: We found that the voxel count feature (P<0.001) could be used as a predictor for distinguishing IPAs from preinvasive lesions. However, the surface area feature (P=0.040) and the extruded surface area feature (P=0.013) could be predictors of IPAs compared with MIAs. In addition, the correlation feature (P=0.046) could distinguish preinvasive lesions from MIAs better. CONCLUSIONS: Preinvasive lesions, MIAs and IPAs can be discriminated based on texture features within CT images, although the three diseases could all appear as GGOs on CT images. The diagnoses of these three diseases are very important for clinical surgery.
Authors: E A Kim; T Johkoh; K S Lee; J Han; K Fujimoto; J Sadohara; P S Yang; T Kozuka; O Honda; S Kim Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Alain C Borczuk; Fang Qian; Angeliki Kazeros; Jennifer Eleazar; Adel Assaad; Joshua R Sonett; Mark Ginsburg; Lyall Gorenstein; Charles A Powell Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.394