| Literature DB >> 30208901 |
Natalia Wasilewska1, Anna Bobrus-Chociej2, Ewa Harasim-Symbor3, Eugeniusz Tarasów4, Małgorzata Wojtkowska5, Adrian Chabowski3, Dariusz M Lebensztejn2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatic lipid accumulation is closely related to the development of insulin resistance, which is regarded as one of the most significant risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Although the exact molecular pathway leading to impaired insulin signaling has not been definitively established, ceramides are suspected mediators of lipid induced hepatic insulin resistance. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the serum ceramides concentration in obese children with NAFLD.Entities:
Keywords: Ceramides; Fatty liver; Magnetic resonance proton spectroscopy; NAFLD; Obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30208901 PMCID: PMC6136227 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0855-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of the study group (n = 80)
| Parameter | Median (Q1-Q3 |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 12 (11–15) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 (25.9–31.9) |
| Waist (cm) | 94 (90–104) |
| ALT (IU/l) | 35.5 (21.5–59.0) |
| GGT (IU/l) | 21 (15.5–30.0) |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 177.5 (146.0–191.5) |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 47.5 (39–54) |
| LDL – cholesterol (mg/dl) | 99.5 (79.5–121.0) |
| Triglycerides (TG) (mg/dl) | 107.5 (84.0–152.5) |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 92.0 (85.5–96.0) |
| Insulin (μIU/ml) | 15.0 (11.7–19.9) |
| HOMA – IR | 3.5 (2.6–4.5) |
| TILC (r.u) | 107 (58–180) |
Comparison of selected parameters between the group of NAFLD patients and non-hepatopathic obese patients
| Parameter | NAFLD group ( | Non – hepatopathic obese ( | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 14 (11–16) | 12 (10.5–14) | ns |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.1 (26.6–33.5) | 26.2 (25.3–29.5) | 0.035 |
| Waist (cm) | 98 (94–107) | 87 (82–94) | 0.004 |
| ALT (IU/l) | 64 (51–104) | 18 (15–21) | < 0.001 |
| GGT (IU/l) | 30 (22–45) | 15.0 (13.0–18.5) | < 0.001 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 181 (159–216) | 162.5 (139.5–182.0) | ns |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 45 (40–51) | 50.5 (41–55.5) | ns |
| LDL – cholesterol (mg/dl) | 105 (80–145) | 89.5 (74.0–105.5) | ns |
| Triglycerides (TG) (mg/dl) | 140 (85–167) | 87.5 (73.0–121.0) | 0.037 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 93 (84–99) | 91 (86–96) | ns |
| Insulin (μIU/ml) | 17.4 (13.8–21.0) | 14.8 (10.3–17.7) | ns |
| HOMA – IR | 3.9 (2.8–4.8) | 3.4 (2.3–3.8) | ns |
| TILC (r.u) | 172 (120–216) | 29 (17–58) | < 0.001 |
Fig. 1Total ceramide concentrations in serum of the patients with NAFLD (NAFLD) and reference group (Reference)
Differences between serum FA-ceramide (CER) (nmol/ml) concentrations in study group and reference group
| Ceramide (FA) | Study group | Reference group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CER myristic (C14:0) | 2.1 (1.4–4.3) | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | < 0.001 |
| CER palmitic (C16:0) | 8.6 (6.7–10.4) | 5.2 (4.8–6.8) | < 0.001 |
| CER palmitoleic (C16:1) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | < 0.001 |
| CER stearic (C18:0) | 5.6 (4.5–7.6) | 4.0 (3.6–4.5) | < 0.005 |
| CER oleic (C18:1) | 2.8 (2.4–3.6) | 2.1 (1.9–2.8) | < 0.005 |
| CER linoleic (C18:2) | 0.3 (0.0–1.0) | 0.2 (0.0–0.7) | ns |
| CER arachidic (C20:0) | 0.5 (0.4–0.6) | 0.4 (0.4–0.5) | ns |
| CER linolenic (C18:3) | 0.3 (0.2–0.3) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | ns |
| CER behenic (C22:0) | 1.5 (1.3–1.7) | 1.3 (1.1–1.4) | < 0.01 |
| CER arachidonic (C20:4) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | ns |
| CER lignoceric (C24:0) | 3.3 (2.8–4.1) | 3.0 (2.6–3.3) | < 0.05 |
| CER eicosapentaenoic (C20:5) | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | ns |
| CER nervinic (C24:1) | 2.3 (2.0–2.6) | 2.0 (1.9–2.2) | ns |
| CER docosahexaenoic (C22:6) | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | ns |
Differences between serum FA-ceramide (CER) (nmol/ml) concentrations in children with NAFLD and reference group
| Ceramide (FA) | NAFLD group | Reference group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CER myristic (C14:0) | 1.9 (1.3–2.3) | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | < 0.005 |
| CER palmitic (C16:0) | 7.8 (6.5–10.0) | 5.2 (4.8–6.8) | < 0.01 |
| CER palmitoleic (C16:1) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | < 0.001 |
| CER stearic (C18:0) | 5.2 (4.3–6.8) | 4.0 (3.6–4.5) | < 0.05 |
| CER oleic (C18:1) | 2.9 (2.4–3.7) | 2.1 (1.9–2.8) | < 0.05 |
| CER linoleic (C18:2) | 0.5 (0.1–1.1) | 0.2 (0.0–0.7) | ns |
| CER arachidic (C20:0) | 0.5 (0.4–0.6) | 0.4 (0.4–0.5) | ns |
| CER linolenic (C18:3) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | ns |
| CER behenic (C22:0) | 1.6 (1.4–1.7) | 1.3 (1.1–1.4) | < 0.005 |
| CER arachidonic (C20:4) | 0.6 (0.4–0.7) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | ns |
| CER lignoceric (C24:0) | 3.7 (3.0–4.1) | 3.0 (2.6–3.3) | < 0.01 |
| CER eicosapentaenoic (C20:5) | 0.7 (0.7–0.9) | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | ns |
| CER nervinic (C24:1) | 2.3 (2.0–2.5) | 2.0 (1.9–2.2) | ns |
| CER docosahexaenoic (C22:6) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | ns |
Fig. 2Correlation between serum total ceramide concentration and HOMA-IR index