Literature DB >> 30207916

Mutation Clearance after Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Eric J Duncavage1, Meagan A Jacoby1, Gue Su Chang1, Christopher A Miller1, Natasha Edwin1, Jin Shao1, Kevin Elliott1, Joshua Robinson1, Haley Abel1, Robert S Fulton1, Catrina C Fronick1, Michelle O'Laughlin1, Sharon E Heath1, Kimberly Brendel1, Raya Saba1, Lukas D Wartman1, Matthew J Christopher1, Iskra Pusic1, John S Welch1, Geoffrey L Uy1, Daniel C Link1, John F DiPersio1, Peter Westervelt1, Timothy J Ley1, Kathryn Trinkaus1, Timothy A Graubert1, Matthew J Walter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The molecular predictors of disease progression after transplantation are unclear.
METHODS: We sequenced bone marrow and skin samples from 90 adults with MDS who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We detected mutations before transplantation using enhanced exome sequencing, and we evaluated mutation clearance by using error-corrected sequencing to genotype mutations in bone marrow samples obtained 30 days after transplantation. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the association of a mutation detected after transplantation with disease progression and survival.
RESULTS: Sequencing identified at least one validated somatic mutation before transplantation in 86 of 90 patients (96%); 32 of these patients (37%) had at least one mutation with a maximum variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% (equivalent to 1 heterozygous mutant cell in 100 cells) 30 days after transplantation. Patients with disease progression had mutations with a higher maximum variant allele frequency at 30 days than those who did not (median maximum variant allele frequency, 0.9% vs. 0%; P<0.001). The presence of at least one mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 was associated with a higher risk of progression (53.1% vs. 13.0%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96 to 7.62; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than the absence of such a mutation (31.3% vs. 59.3%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.73; P=0.005). The rate of progression-free survival was lower among patients who had received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and had at least one persistent mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 than among patients with other combinations of conditioning regimen and mutation status (P≤0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients who had a mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% detected at day 30 had a higher risk of progression (hazard ratio, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.08; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than those who did not (hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09; P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of disease progression was higher among patients with MDS in whom persistent disease-associated mutations were detected in the bone marrow 30 days after transplantation than among those in whom these mutations were not detected. (Funded by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and others.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30207916      PMCID: PMC6309244          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  31 in total

1.  Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Matthew J Walter; Dong Shen; Li Ding; Jin Shao; Daniel C Koboldt; Ken Chen; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; David Dooling; Rachel Abbott; Robert Fulton; Vincent Magrini; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki-Veizer; Michelle O'Laughlin; Xian Fan; Marcus Grillot; Sarah Witowski; Sharon Heath; John L Frater; William Eades; Michael Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Daniel C Link; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Timothy A Graubert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Minimal residual disease monitoring after allogeneic transplantation may help to individualize post-transplant therapeutic strategies in acute myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  María Díez-Campelo; José Antonio Pérez-Simón; Jose Pérez; Miguel Alcoceba; Juan Richtmon; Belén Vidriales; Jesús San Miguel
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Monitoring of donor chimerism in sorted CD34+ peripheral blood cells allows the sensitive detection of imminent relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Martin Bornhäuser; Uta Oelschlaegel; Uwe Platzbecker; Gesine Bug; Karin Lutterbeck; Michael G Kiehl; Johannes Schetelig; Alexander Kiani; Thomas Illmer; Markus Schaich; Catrin Theuser; Brigitte Mohr; Cornelia Brendel; Axel A Fauser; Stefan Klein; Hans Martin; Gerhard Ehninger; Christian Thiede
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Evaluation of BM cytomorphology after allo-SCT in patients with MDS.

Authors:  M Christopeit; S Ocheni; T Haferlach; K Miersch; T Zabelina; E Klyuchnikov; M Binder; F Ayuk; P Schafhausen; A R Zander; C Bokemeyer; N Kröger; U Bacher
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Evaluation of BM cytomorphology after allo-SCT in patients with AML.

Authors:  M Christopeit; K Miersch; E Klyuchnikov; T Haferlach; M Binder; T Zabelina; F Ayuk; P Schafhausen; A R Zander; C Bokemeyer; N Kröger; U Bacher
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Early detection of relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after allo-SCT.

Authors:  M Tobiasson; R Olsson; E Hellström-Lindberg; J Mattsson
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions as first salvage therapy for relapse of AML or MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  T Schroeder; A Czibere; U Platzbecker; G Bug; L Uharek; T Luft; A Giagounidis; F Zohren; I Bruns; C Wolschke; K Rieger; R Fenk; U Germing; R Haas; N Kröger; G Kobbe
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  CD34(+) lineage specific donor cell chimerism for the diagnosis and treatment of impending relapse of AML or myelodysplastic syndrome after allo-SCT.

Authors:  F Rosenow; A Berkemeier; U Krug; C Müller-Tidow; J Gerss; G Silling; C Groth; P Wieacker; N Bogdanova; R Mesters; T Büchner; J Kienast; W E Berdel; M Stelljes
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Azacitidine for treatment of imminent relapse in MDS or AML patients after allogeneic HSCT: results of the RELAZA trial.

Authors:  U Platzbecker; M Wermke; J Radke; U Oelschlaegel; F Seltmann; A Kiani; I-M Klut; H Knoth; C Röllig; J Schetelig; B Mohr; X Graehlert; G Ehninger; M Bornhäuser; C Thiede
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  35 in total

1.  LC-FACSeq is a method for detecting rare clones in leukemia.

Authors:  Eileen Y Hu; James S Blachly; Caner Saygin; Hatice G Ozer; Stephanie E Workman; Arletta Lozanski; Tzyy-Jye Doong; Chi-Ling Chiang; Seema Bhat; Kerry A Rogers; Jennifer A Woyach; Kevin R Coombes; Daniel Jones; Natarajan Muthusamy; Gerard Lozanski; John C Byrd
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Advances in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and future prospects: Lessons learned from precision genomics.

Authors:  Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Adv Cell Gene Ther       Date:  2019-01-16

3.  TP53 immunohistochemistry correlates with TP53 mutation status and clearance in decitabine-treated patients with myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Marianna B Ruzinova; Yi-Shan Lee; Eric J Duncavage; John S Welch
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Getting personal with myelodysplastic syndromes: is now the right time?

Authors:  Nora Chokr; Alexander B Pine; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Rory M Shallis; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.929

5.  Genome Sequencing as an Alternative to Cytogenetic Analysis in Myeloid Cancers.

Authors:  Eric J Duncavage; Molly C Schroeder; Michele O'Laughlin; Roxanne Wilson; Sandra MacMillan; Andrew Bohannon; Scott Kruchowski; John Garza; Feiyu Du; Andrew E O Hughes; Josh Robinson; Emma Hughes; Sharon E Heath; Jack D Baty; Julie Neidich; Matthew J Christopher; Meagan A Jacoby; Geoffrey L Uy; Robert S Fulton; Christopher A Miller; Jacqueline E Payton; Daniel C Link; Matthew J Walter; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Timothy J Ley; David H Spencer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS?

Authors:  Felicitas Thol; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS?

Authors:  Guillermo F Sanz; Mariam Ibañez; Esperanza Such
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

8.  Prognostic significance of serial molecular annotation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML).

Authors:  Seongseok Yun; Susan M Geyer; Rami S Komrokji; Najla H Al Ali; Jinming Song; Mohammad Hussaini; Kendra L Sweet; Jeffrey E Lancet; Alan F List; Eric Padron; David A Sallman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  In MDS, is higher risk higher reward?

Authors:  Guillermo F Sanz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 10.  Genetics of progression from MDS to secondary leukemia.

Authors:  Andrew J Menssen; Matthew J Walter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.