BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The molecular predictors of disease progression after transplantation are unclear. METHODS: We sequenced bone marrow and skin samples from 90 adults with MDS who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We detected mutations before transplantation using enhanced exome sequencing, and we evaluated mutation clearance by using error-corrected sequencing to genotype mutations in bone marrow samples obtained 30 days after transplantation. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the association of a mutation detected after transplantation with disease progression and survival. RESULTS: Sequencing identified at least one validated somatic mutation before transplantation in 86 of 90 patients (96%); 32 of these patients (37%) had at least one mutation with a maximum variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% (equivalent to 1 heterozygous mutant cell in 100 cells) 30 days after transplantation. Patients with disease progression had mutations with a higher maximum variant allele frequency at 30 days than those who did not (median maximum variant allele frequency, 0.9% vs. 0%; P<0.001). The presence of at least one mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 was associated with a higher risk of progression (53.1% vs. 13.0%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96 to 7.62; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than the absence of such a mutation (31.3% vs. 59.3%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.73; P=0.005). The rate of progression-free survival was lower among patients who had received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and had at least one persistent mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 than among patients with other combinations of conditioning regimen and mutation status (P≤0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients who had a mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% detected at day 30 had a higher risk of progression (hazard ratio, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.08; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than those who did not (hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of disease progression was higher among patients with MDS in whom persistent disease-associated mutations were detected in the bone marrow 30 days after transplantation than among those in whom these mutations were not detected. (Funded by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and others.).
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The molecular predictors of disease progression after transplantation are unclear. METHODS: We sequenced bone marrow and skin samples from 90 adults with MDS who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We detected mutations before transplantation using enhanced exome sequencing, and we evaluated mutation clearance by using error-corrected sequencing to genotype mutations in bone marrow samples obtained 30 days after transplantation. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the association of a mutation detected after transplantation with disease progression and survival. RESULTS: Sequencing identified at least one validated somatic mutation before transplantation in 86 of 90 patients (96%); 32 of these patients (37%) had at least one mutation with a maximum variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% (equivalent to 1 heterozygous mutant cell in 100 cells) 30 days after transplantation. Patients with disease progression had mutations with a higher maximum variant allele frequency at 30 days than those who did not (median maximum variant allele frequency, 0.9% vs. 0%; P<0.001). The presence of at least one mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 was associated with a higher risk of progression (53.1% vs. 13.0%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96 to 7.62; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than the absence of such a mutation (31.3% vs. 59.3%; conditioning regimen-adjusted hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.73; P=0.005). The rate of progression-free survival was lower among patients who had received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and had at least one persistent mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% at day 30 than among patients with other combinations of conditioning regimen and mutation status (P≤0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients who had a mutation with a variant allele frequency of at least 0.5% detected at day 30 had a higher risk of progression (hazard ratio, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.08; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year rate of progression-free survival than those who did not (hazard ratio for progression or death, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of disease progression was higher among patients with MDS in whom persistent disease-associated mutations were detected in the bone marrow 30 days after transplantation than among those in whom these mutations were not detected. (Funded by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and others.).
Authors: Matthew J Walter; Dong Shen; Li Ding; Jin Shao; Daniel C Koboldt; Ken Chen; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; David Dooling; Rachel Abbott; Robert Fulton; Vincent Magrini; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki-Veizer; Michelle O'Laughlin; Xian Fan; Marcus Grillot; Sarah Witowski; Sharon Heath; John L Frater; William Eades; Michael Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Daniel C Link; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Timothy A Graubert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: María Díez-Campelo; José Antonio Pérez-Simón; Jose Pérez; Miguel Alcoceba; Juan Richtmon; Belén Vidriales; Jesús San Miguel Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Martin Bornhäuser; Uta Oelschlaegel; Uwe Platzbecker; Gesine Bug; Karin Lutterbeck; Michael G Kiehl; Johannes Schetelig; Alexander Kiani; Thomas Illmer; Markus Schaich; Catrin Theuser; Brigitte Mohr; Cornelia Brendel; Axel A Fauser; Stefan Klein; Hans Martin; Gerhard Ehninger; Christian Thiede Journal: Haematologica Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: M Christopeit; S Ocheni; T Haferlach; K Miersch; T Zabelina; E Klyuchnikov; M Binder; F Ayuk; P Schafhausen; A R Zander; C Bokemeyer; N Kröger; U Bacher Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase Journal: Blood Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M Christopeit; K Miersch; E Klyuchnikov; T Haferlach; M Binder; T Zabelina; F Ayuk; P Schafhausen; A R Zander; C Bokemeyer; N Kröger; U Bacher Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: T Schroeder; A Czibere; U Platzbecker; G Bug; L Uharek; T Luft; A Giagounidis; F Zohren; I Bruns; C Wolschke; K Rieger; R Fenk; U Germing; R Haas; N Kröger; G Kobbe Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: F Rosenow; A Berkemeier; U Krug; C Müller-Tidow; J Gerss; G Silling; C Groth; P Wieacker; N Bogdanova; R Mesters; T Büchner; J Kienast; W E Berdel; M Stelljes Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: U Platzbecker; M Wermke; J Radke; U Oelschlaegel; F Seltmann; A Kiani; I-M Klut; H Knoth; C Röllig; J Schetelig; B Mohr; X Graehlert; G Ehninger; M Bornhäuser; C Thiede Journal: Leukemia Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Eileen Y Hu; James S Blachly; Caner Saygin; Hatice G Ozer; Stephanie E Workman; Arletta Lozanski; Tzyy-Jye Doong; Chi-Ling Chiang; Seema Bhat; Kerry A Rogers; Jennifer A Woyach; Kevin R Coombes; Daniel Jones; Natarajan Muthusamy; Gerard Lozanski; John C Byrd Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-06-18
Authors: Nora Chokr; Alexander B Pine; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Rory M Shallis; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan Journal: Expert Rev Hematol Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 2.929
Authors: Eric J Duncavage; Molly C Schroeder; Michele O'Laughlin; Roxanne Wilson; Sandra MacMillan; Andrew Bohannon; Scott Kruchowski; John Garza; Feiyu Du; Andrew E O Hughes; Josh Robinson; Emma Hughes; Sharon E Heath; Jack D Baty; Julie Neidich; Matthew J Christopher; Meagan A Jacoby; Geoffrey L Uy; Robert S Fulton; Christopher A Miller; Jacqueline E Payton; Daniel C Link; Matthew J Walter; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Timothy J Ley; David H Spencer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Seongseok Yun; Susan M Geyer; Rami S Komrokji; Najla H Al Ali; Jinming Song; Mohammad Hussaini; Kendra L Sweet; Jeffrey E Lancet; Alan F List; Eric Padron; David A Sallman Journal: Leukemia Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 11.528