| Literature DB >> 30206433 |
Yoon-Kyung Chung1, Jung-Seok Choi2, Sung-Beom Yu3, Yang-Il Choi4.
Abstract
We evaluated the physicochemical and storage characteristics of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi treated with onion skin powder (OSP) and blackcurrant fruit powder (BFP). The experimental design included seven treatments: a control (ascorbic acid 0.1%), T1: OSP 0.3%, T2: OSP 0.6%, T3: BFP 0.3%, T4: BFP 0.6%, T5: OSP 0.15%+BFP 0.15%, and T6: OSP 0.3%+BFP 0.3%. The OSP was higher in both polyphenol and flavonoid contents compared to BFP (p<0.05). The moisture and ash contents of all Tteokgalbi samples with a large amount of added natural antioxidant powder (0.6%) were higher than those with small amounts of added antioxidant (0.3%). The cooking loss and water holding capacity were outstanding in the T2 treatment compared to the others (p<0.05). The lightness, redness, and yellowness values were reduced on the addition of 0.6% antioxidant powder (p<0.05). The springiness and cohesiveness values of the Tteokgalbi samples were higher for the 0.3% addition than the control and 0.6% addition (p<0.05). The Tteokgalbi samples with natural antioxidants showed similar sensory attribute scores compared to the control. The pH values reduced as the BFP increased (p<0.05), and the total microbial count increased after OSP addition. The 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance values of the samples treated with OSP were significantly lower than the control after day 10 (p<0.05). As a result, the addition of OSP or BFP did not have a significant negative influence on the quality characteristics of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi. In particular, the addition of 0.6% OSP was effective in increasing water retentivity and inhibiting lipid oxidation.Entities:
Keywords: Hanwoo beef; Tteokgalbi; black currant powder; natural antioxidant; onion skin powder
Year: 2018 PMID: 30206433 PMCID: PMC6131370 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.e12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Experimental design and formula for Hanwoo Tteokgalbi
(Unit: %)
| Treatments | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onion skin powder | - | 0.3 | 0.6 | - | - | 0.15 | 0.3 |
| Black currant powder | - | - | - | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.3 |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| (Unit: g) | |||||||
| Hanwoo beef | 76.38 | Scallion | 2 | ||||
| Ice | 7 | Calcium lactate | 0.1 | ||||
| Onion | 5 | Galic | 0.5 | ||||
| Kiwi juice | 0.5 | Sesame oil | 0.5 | ||||
| Soy sauce | 4 | Salt | 1 | ||||
| Shiitake | 1 | Pepper | 0.02 | ||||
| Sugar | 2 | ||||||
| Total | 100 | ||||||
Fig. 1A photo of the Hanwoo Tteokgalbi products with onion skin powder (OSP) and blackcurrant fruit powder (BFP).
Total polyphenol and flavonoid contents of onion skin powder and black currant fruit powder
(Unit: mg/g)
| Treatments | Onion skin powder | Black currant fruit powder |
|---|---|---|
| Polyphenol | 69.23±0.44[ | 4.50±0.09[ |
| Flavonoid | 4.26±0.43[ | 2.97±0.04[ |
1) Treatments are same as Table 1.
a,b Means±SD with different superscription within the same row differ (p<0.05).
Proximate contents of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi with natural antioxidants
| Treatments[ | CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 74.85±0.15[ | 73.96±0.14[ | 74.40±1.04[ | 74.20±0.43[ | 75.22±0.30[ | 74.14±0.58[ | 75.59±0.13[ |
| Fat (%) | 2.00±0.06[ | 2.19±0.12[ | 2.27±0.17[ | 2.41±0.09[ | 2.11±0.09[ | 2.12±0.24[ | 1.84±0.04[ |
| Ash (%) | 2.36±0.01[ | 2.28±0.01[ | 2.39±0.05[ | 2.17±0.12[ | 2.35±0.01[ | 2.24±0.06[ | 2.40±0.05[ |
1) Treatments are same as Table 1.
a–d Means±SD with different superscription within the same row differ (p<0.05).
Quality characteristics of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi with natural antioxidants
| Treatments[ | CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHC (%) | 53.52±3.16[ | 55.47±1.60[ | 62.51±3.32[ | 54.71±2.41[ | 50.70±4.45[ | 50.65±3.02[ | 50.97±2.09[ |
| Purge loss (%) | 1.38±0.54 | 1.45±0.73 | 0.56±0.15 | 1.94±0.84 | 0.73±0.16 | 1.26±0.17 | 1.27±0.63 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 15.25±0.43[ | 18.07±0.09[ | 15.23±1.29[ | 18.27±0.51[ | 17.64±0.25[ | 17.51±2.59[ | 15.91±0.63[ |
| L* | 41.01±1.49[ | 45.52±0.88[ | 40.63±0.30[ | 43.61±0.84[ | 41.19±0.51[ | 47.76±1.49[ | 41.63±0.80[ |
| a* | 5.36±0.29[ | 5.95±0.22[ | 4.98±0.32[ | 5.73±0.23[ | 4.42±0.18[ | 5.68±0.36[ | 4.50±0.30[ |
| b* | 13.71±0.48[ | 13.09±0.44[ | 12.54±0.51[ | 12.83±0.49[ | 12.01±0.39[ | 13.29±0.86[ | 12.65±0.30[ |
| Springiness (%) | 22.02±4.48[ | 54.45±7.46[ | 20.85±3.23[ | 60.28±4.90[ | 22.58±1.66[ | 53.52±4.53[ | 22.53±3.39[ |
| Cohesiveness (%) | 30.92±5.80[ | 57.12±9.27[ | 32.01±4.73[ | 59.55±5.60[ | 32.52±3.98[ | 53.13±4.98[ | 35.36±5.55[ |
| Chewiness (g) | 77.90±20.12[ | 83.23±23.99[ | 97.19±20.28[ | 117.49±48.70[ | 75.34±14.65[ | 175.16±30.49[ | 67.35±14.4[ |
1) Treatments are same as Table 1.
a–d Means±SD with different superscription within the same row differ (p<0.05).
WHC, water holding capacity.
Sensory evaluation of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi with natural antioxidants
| Treatments[ | CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | 3.20±0.44[ | 3.20±0.44[ | 3.20±0.44[ | 3.20±0.44[ | 2.40±0.54[ | 2.60±0.54[ | 2.20±0.44[ |
| Saltiness | 2.00±0.00[ | 4.00±0.70[ | 2.20±0.44[ | 3.20±0.83[ | 2.00±0.70[ | 3.40±0.54[ | 2.40±0.54[ |
| Bitterness | 3.60±1.14[ | 2.60±0.54[ | 3.40±0.54[ | 2.40±0.89[ | 3.60±0.89[ | 2.20±0.44[ | 4.00±0.00[ |
| Flavor | 3.20±0.83[ | 3.40±0.54[ | 3.60±0.54[ | 4.20±0.44[ | 3.60±0.54[ | 3.60±0.54[ | 4.00±0.00[ |
| Tenderness | 3.40±0.54 | 2.60±0.54 | 3.60±0.89 | 3.60±0.54 | 3.20±1.09 | 3.40±0.89 | 3.40±0.54 |
| Juiciness | 3.40±0.54 | 3.20±0.83 | 2.60±0.54 | 3.60±0.54 | 3.00±0.70 | 3.60±0.89 | 3.00±0.70 |
| Total acceptability | 3.20±0.44[ | 3.00±0.00[ | 3.40±0.54[ | 3.80±0.44[ | 3.20±0.44[ | 3.60±0.54[ | 3.60±0.54[ |
1) Treatments are same as Table 1.
a–c Means±SD with different superscription within the same row differ (p<0.05).
Storage characteristics of Hanwoo Tteokgalbi with natural antioxidants
| Treatments[ | Day | CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 0 | 5.40±0.01[ | 5.43±0.01[ | 5.46±0.01[ | 5.31±0.01[ | 5.24±0.02[ | 5.36±0.00[ | 5.34±0.00[ |
| 3 | 5.40±0.00[ | 5.48±0.00[ | 5.50±0.00[ | 5.37±0.01[ | 5.31±0.01[ | 5.44±0.00[ | 5.37±0.00[ | |
| 7 | 5.47±0.00[ | 5.52±0.00[ | 5.54±0.01[ | 5.40±0.00[ | 5.32±0.00[ | 5.45±0.01[ | 5.40±0.00[ | |
| 10 | 5.44±0.02[ | 5.54±0.00[ | 5.55±0.01[ | 5.37±0.00[ | 5.37±0.01[ | 5.46±0.01[ | 5.45±0.00[ | |
| TMC | 0 | 3.69±0.12[ | 4.25±0.20[ | 3.84±0.21[ | 3.34±0.49[ | 3.38±0.12[ | 3.53±0.08[ | 3.58±0.15[ |
| 3 | 4.15±0.21[ | 4.69±0.30[ | 4.84±0.21[ | 4.00±0.00[ | 4.15±0.21[ | 4.30±0.00[ | 4.58±0.15[ | |
| 7 | 4.00±0.00[ | 4.92±0.21[ | 5.09±0.02[ | 4.00±0.00[ | 4.15±0.21[ | 4.38±0.12[ | 4.73±0.05[ | |
| 10 | 4.00±0.00[ | 5.26±0.13[ | 5.09±0.02[ | 4.15±0.21[ | 4.15±0.21[ | 4.65±0.06[ | 4.97±0.03[ | |
| TBARS | 0 | 0.27±0.00[ | 0.42±0.06[ | 0.27±0.00[ | 0.82±0.08[ | 1.25±0.02[ | 0.72±0.07[ | 0.85±0.00[ |
| 3 | 0.36±0.05[ | 0.28±0.03[ | 0.36±0.05[ | 0.79±0.08[ | 1.33±0.05[ | 0.48±0.02[ | 0.80±0.05[ | |
| 7 | 0.32±0.02[ | 0.34±0.03[ | 0.30±0.03[ | 0.69±0.03[ | 1.30±0.02[ | 0.53±0.01[ | 0.70±0.04[ | |
| 10 | 0.84±0.02[ | 0.38±0.00[ | 0.68±0.02[ | 0.78±0.04[ | 0.91±0.01[ | 0.51±0.02[ | 0.59±0.02[ |
1) Treatments are same as Table 1.
a–g Means±SD with different superscription within the same row differ (p<0.05).
TMC, total microbial count; TBARS, 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substance.