Literature DB >> 30206407

Targeted next-generation sequencing in the detection of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancers.

Fei Dong1, Danielle C Costigan1, Brooke E Howitt2.   

Abstract

Mismatch repair deficiency represents a biomarker of immunotherapy response and a phenotypic feature of Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancers. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing assay, we identified molecular features of mismatch repair deficiency, specifically insertion and deletion mutations in mononucleotide repeats, and established thresholds for the number of such mutations to classify endometrial cancers as mismatch repair deficient, proficient, or indeterminate. Sequencing classification was compared to the loss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 expression by immunohistochemistry. A total of 259 endometrial cancers were classified by sequencing as mismatch repair deficient (n = 48, 19%), proficient (n = 199, 77%), or indeterminate (n = 12, 5%). Sequencing findings were concordant with loss of expression of at least one mismatch repair protein in 47 of 48 (98%) cases classified as deficient and retained expression of all four proteins in 190 of 199 (95%) cases classified as proficient. Of the 12 cases classified as indeterminate, 7 (58%) demonstrated mismatch repair protein loss. Overall, targeted next-generation sequencing exhibited a high rate of concordance with immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair deficiency; however, sequencing was indeterminate in a few cases and demonstrated a false negative rate of 5%. Although we recommend implementation of a mismatch repair deficiency algorithm for laboratories performing next-generation sequencing cancer panels, immunohistochemistry remains a cost-effective screening method for mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30206407     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0125-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  4 in total

1.  Practical guidance for mismatch repair-deficiency testing in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  E Stelloo; A M L Jansen; E M Osse; R A Nout; C L Creutzberg; D Ruano; D N Church; H Morreau; V T H B M Smit; T van Wezel; T Bosse
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Target gene mutation profile differs between gastrointestinal and endometrial tumors with mismatch repair deficiency.

Authors:  Alex Duval; Maryline Reperant; Aurore Compoint; Raquel Seruca; Guglielmina N Ranzani; Barry Iacopetta; Richard Hamelin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Universal Screening for Mismatch-Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancers to Identify Patients With Lynch Syndrome and Lynch-like Syndrome.

Authors:  Jaclyn C Watkins; Eric J Yang; Michael G Muto; Colleen M Feltmate; Ross S Berkowitz; Neil S Horowitz; Sapna Syngal; Matthew B Yurgelun; Anu Chittenden; Jason L Hornick; Christopher P Crum; Lynette M Sholl; Brooke E Howitt
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Causes and consequences of microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  C C Gurin; M G Federici; L Kang; J Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Detection of ERBB2 amplification in uterine serous carcinoma by next-generation sequencing: an approach highly concordant with standard assays.

Authors:  Carrie L Robinson; Beth T Harrison; Azra H Ligon; Fei Dong; Valeria Maffeis; Ursula Matulonis; Marisa R Nucci; David L Kolin
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amelia Favier; Justine Varinot; Catherine Uzan; Alex Duval; Isabelle Brocheriou; Geoffroy Canlorbe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of endometrial screening liquid-based cytology specimens: a comparative study to tissue specimens.

Authors:  Toshiaki Akahane; Ikumi Kitazono; Shintaro Yanazume; Masaki Kamio; Shinichi Togami; Ippei Sakamoto; Sachio Nohara; Seiya Yokoyama; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Tsubasa Hiraki; Shinsuke Suzuki; Shinichi Ueno; Akihide Tanimoto
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.