| Literature DB >> 30206377 |
Laura Belloni1, Silvia Di Cocco2,3, Francesca Guerrieri1, Abigail D G Nunn1, Silvia Piconese2,4, Debora Salerno1, Barbara Testoni5, Claudio Pulito6, Federica Mori6, Matteo Pallocca7, Andrea Sacconi8, Elisa Vivoli9, Fabio Marra9, Sabrina Strano6,10, Giovanni Blandino8, Massimo Levrero1,2,5,11, Natalia Pediconi12,13.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of chronic liver disease. Although genetic predisposition and epigenetic factors contribute to the development of NAFLD, our understanding of the molecular mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of the disease is still emerging. Here we investigated a possible role of a microRNAs-STAT3 pathway in the induction of hepatic steatosis. Differentiated HepaRG cells treated with the fatty acid sodium oleate (fatty dHepaRG) recapitulated features of liver vesicular steatosis and activated a cell-autonomous inflammatory response, inducing STAT3-Tyrosine-phosphorylation. With a genome-wide approach (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing), many phospho-STAT3 binding sites were identified in fatty dHepaRG cells and several STAT3 and/or NAFLD-regulated microRNAs showed increased expression levels, including miR-21. Innovative CARS (Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering) microscopy revealed that chemical inhibition of STAT3 activity decreased lipid accumulation and deregulated STAT3-responsive microRNAs, including miR-21, in lipid overloaded dHepaRG cells. We were able to show in vivo that reducing phospho-STAT3-miR-21 levels in C57/BL6 mice liver, by long-term treatment with metformin, protected mice from aging-dependent hepatic vesicular steatosis. Our results identified a microRNAs-phosphoSTAT3 pathway involved in the development of hepatic steatosis, which may represent a molecular marker for both diagnosis and therapeutic targeting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30206377 PMCID: PMC6134080 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31835-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sodium oleate treatment of dHepaRG cells induced lipid droplets accumulation, ROS formation and deregulated lipid metabolism and liver-specific genes expression. (a) Differentiated HepaRG (dHepaRG) cells were treated with vehicle (control) or with sodium oleate 250 μM for 2 or 4 days. After treatments, cells were stained with Oil Red O, lipid droplets are visible in red (Upper panels). Oil Red O dye was eluted and OD measured at 500 nm. Results are expressed as fold change of treated cells over control (Lower panel). (b) dHepaRG cells treated as in (a) were analyzed by citofluorimetry after Bodipy staining. Left panel: representative overlay of profile. Right panel: Histograms show MFI (Mean Fluorescence Intensity) as fold induction of treated cells over control from 3 independent experiments. (c) dHepaRG cells treated as in (a) were analyzed by citofluorimetry after DHCFDA (2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate) dye staining. Left panel: representative overlay of profile. Right panel: Histograms show % of DHCFDA positive cells as fold induction of treated cells over control from 3 independent experiments. (d) dHepaRG cells were treated as in (a) for 4 days. cDNAs were analyzed with a Human Fatty Liver RT² Profiler PCR Array, histograms show expression levels of a selected panel of genes as fold induction of treated cells over control. (Bars indicate S.D.; asterisks indicate p-value).
Figure 2Fatty dHepaRG cells activate a cell autonomous IL6 inflammatory response. (a) dHepaRG cells were treated with vehicle (Ctrl) or with sodium oleate 250 μM for 4 days. cDNAs were analyzed by qPCR with primers specific for the indicated genes and normalized to Actin. (b) Left panel: total protein extracts were analyzed by Immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Right panel: densitometric analysis (ImageJ software). (c) Cells were treated as in a) and supernatants were colllected to quantify secreted IL6 levels by ELISA assay. (d) Left panel: nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extracts from cells treated as in a) were analysed by Immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Right panel: densitometric analysis (ImageJ software). Histograms show fold induction of treated cells versus control; bars indicate S.D.; asterisks indicate p-value. Full-length blots are included in Supplementary Fig. 9.
Figure 3Activation of STAT3 in fatty dHepaRG. (a) Left panel: dHepaRG cells were treated with vehicle (Ctrl) or with sodium oleate 250 μM for 4 days, protein extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Right panel: densitometric analysis (ImageJ software). (b) RNA transcripts were extracted from cells treated as in a) and cDNAs were analyzed with STAT3 specific primers and normalized to Actin. (c/d) dHepaRG cells were treated with vehicle (Ctrl) or with sodium oleate 250 μM for 4 days, and co-treated for the subsequent 18 hours with sodium oleate 250 μM and with Ruxolitinib 1 μM (c) or with sodium oleate 250 μM and NAC 10 mM (d). Left panels: protein extracts were analyzed by Immunoblot with the indicated antibodies. Right panels: densitometric analysis (ImageJ software). Histograms show relative protein level expressed as fold induction of treated cells versus control; bars indicate S.D.; asterisks indicate p-value. Full-length blots are included in Supplementary Fig. 10.
Figure 4Identification of phospho-STAT3 binding sites in fatty dHepaRG by ChIP-seq analysis. dHepaRG cells were treated with sodium oleate 250 μM for 4 days (Oleate) or vehicle treated (Ctrl) and immunoprecipitated with a phospho-Tyr705-STAT3 specific antibody. (a) Candidate phospho-STAT3 binding sites from MACS2 peak calling (default MACS2 parameters, qvalue < 0.01). (b) Motif enrichment analysis: STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription), IRF (interferon-regulatory factor). (c/d) Chip-seq profile (left panels) showing phospho-STAT3 enrichment (black circles) on miR-21 (c) and ISG15 (d) promoters after sodium oleate 250 μM treatment. Right panels: cross-linked chromatin from dHepaRG cells treated as in (a) was immunoprecipitated with a phosphoTyr705-STAT3 (pSTAT3) and an acetylated-Histone4 (AcH4) antibody and analyzed by qPCR with primers specific for the observated phospho-STAT3 peaks on miR-21 (c) and ISG15 (d) promoters, identified by chipseq analysis as shown in left panels. Histograms show Fold Induction (FI) of the % of Input (mean from 3 independent experiments; bars indicate S.D.; asterisks indicate p-value).
NAFLD/NASH and/or STAT3 regulated miRNA.
| Upregulated miRNAs | Downregulated miRNAs | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAFLD/NASH | miR-18a, miR-21, miR-34a, miR-122 | miR-26a, miR-122, miR-221 | Pirola C. J., |
| STAT3 | miR-21, miR-18a | Cao Q.[ |
Figure 5A STAT3-microRNA signaling is involved in lipid accumulation. (a) dHepaRG cells were treated with sodium oleate 250 μM for 4 days or vehicle treated (Ctrl) and co-treated for the subsequent 48 hours with sodium oleate 250 μM plus S3I-201 100 μM or S3I-201 alone. Total RNA were extracted and miRNAs levels were analyzed by qPCR (TaqMan MicroRNA Assay, Applied Biosystems), samples were normalized to the RNU38B endogenous control. Histograms show mean value expressed as fold induction of treated versus control cells. (b) C5BL6 mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or normal diet (ND) for 16 weeks. Upper panel: total RNA were extracted from mice liver and q-PCR quantification of miR-21 expression was normalized to the snoRNA234 endogenous control. Lower panel: densitometric analysis (ImageJ software) of pSTAT3 protein levels from liver mice total protein extracts analyzed by immunoblotting. Histograms show mean value expressed as fold induction of HFD samples versus ND samples. (Bars indicate S.D.; asterisks indicate p-value). Immunoblot is available in Supplementary Fig. 6e.
Figure 6STAT3 inhibition reduced dHepaRG sodium oleate-dependent lipid accumulation. (a) FACS analysis of dHepaRG cells treated as in Fig. 5(a) and stained with the Bodipy lipid probe. Histograms show fold change of treated samples over controls of Mean Bodipy Fluorescent Intensity (MFI). (b) CARS analysis of dHepaRG cells treated as in Fig. 5(a). Left panels: representative images showing lipid droplets fluorescence in red. Right panel: histogram shows mean number of LD, bars show S.E. (c) CARS analysis of dHepaRG cells treated as in Fig. 5(a), histograms show total droplet area/cell (left) and mean droplet area (right). (Bars indicate S.E.; asterisks indicate p-value).
Figure 7Inhibition of phospho-STAT3 and miR-21 expression by metformin long-term therapy protected mice against age dependent liver steatosis. (a) 5 weeks aged C57/BL6 mice were daily treated with either water or metformin (50 mpk) for 72 weeks. At the end of treatment (77 weeks) FFPE livers were stained with Hematoxylin/Eosin. Images A-B: 5 weeks aged mice before treatment; images C-D: 77 weeks old control mice (H20); images E-F: 77 weeks old mice metformin treated. (b) Dot plot showing body weight of mice treated as in (a). (c) Phospho-STAT3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) on liver sections of mice treated as in (a). Left panels: positive IHC cells are stained brown color, images A-B control mice (H20); images C-D metformin treated mice. Right panel: % number of phospho-STAT3 positive cells (6 fields for 4 non-consecutive stained sections per sample were scored). d) Boxplot representing q-PCR quantification of miR-21 expression in liver tissue from 77 weeks mice treated as in (a) (H20 and Metformin) and 5 weeks mice (young) at the beginning of treatment. SnoRNA202 was used as endogenous control to standardize miRNAs expression. Results are expressed as 10−DCt (Asterisks indicate p-value).
In silico analisys of miR-21 predicted target genes in HCC and Fatty Liver disease (mirwalk2.0).
| HCC | HCC and FATTY LIVER | FATTY LIVER |
|---|---|---|
| AKT2, BASP1, BCL2, CCL20, CCNG1, CCR1, CCR7, CD47, CDC25A, CDK6, CLOCK, EDIL3, EGFR, ERBB2, FANCC, FAS, FASLG, FGF18, FUBP1, IL12A, IL1B, JAG1, KLK10, LIFR, MATN2, MEF2A, MEF2C, MMP2, MMP9, MSH2, MTAP, MUC1, MYC, NCOA3, NFKB1, PARP1, PDCD4, PER3, PIK3C2A, PIK3R1, PTEN, PTK2, RB1, RDH11, RPL36A, RTN4, SKP2, SLC2A1, SP1, SPDYA, SPRY2, STAT3, TGFBI, TGFBR3, TIAM1, TP53BP2, TP63, WNT5A | E2F1, ICAM1, PPARA, TGFB1, VEGFA | CLOCK, EIF2S1, LUM, TNFRSF11B |