Literature DB >> 30205948

Prognostic Implications of Mucinous Differentiation in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Can Be Explained by Distinct Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics.

Maliha Khan1, Jonathan M Loree2, Shailesh M Advani3, Jing Ning4, Wen Li4, Allan A L Pereira2, Michael Lam2, Kanwal Raghav2, Van K Morris2, Russell Broaddus5, Dipen Maru5, Michael J Overman2, Scott Kopetz6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mucinous histologic subtype accounts for 5% to 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases but remains poorly characterized. The present study characterized the baseline characteristics, mutational profile, and clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with mucinous CRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1877 patients with metastatic CRC with available histologic findings and molecular profiling and summarized the baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics and overall survival (OS) stratified by the histologic type. The data from separate cohorts with consensus molecular subtype (CMS) and CpG island methylator information were also summarized.
RESULTS: The mucinous histologic type was found in 277 of the 1877 patients (14.8%) and was associated with an increased prevalence of microsatellite instability (P < .001) and a right-sided primary (P < .001). An increased frequency of CMS1 (microsatellite instability immune) and lower rates of CMS2 (canonical) were identified, with mucinous compared with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (P < .0001). Mutations in SMAD4 (P < .001), GNAS (P < .001), ERBB2 (P = .02), BRAF (P < .001), and KRAS (P < .001) occurred at greater frequencies in the mucinous CRC cases, and TP53 (P < .001), APC (P < .001), and NRAS mutations (P = .03) were less common. Univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.63; P < .001) and multivariate analysis (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.64; P = .002) demonstrated that the mucinous histologic type is associated with worse OS. The features associated with the mucinous histologic subtype were independent predictors for shorter OS, including BRAF (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.35-2.25; P < .001) and KRAS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.22-1.65; P < .001) mutations, right-sided location (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39; P = .01), and synchronous metastases (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.49-3.42; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma, the mucinous histologic type is associated with a worse prognosis, even when controlling for known prognostic features. This unique biologic behavior should be considered in the treatment and prognostic assessment of patients with CRC.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus molecular subtype; Histologic type; Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma; Mutation; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205948      PMCID: PMC6588353          DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  16 in total

1.  Clinical impact of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer of mucinous histology: a multicenter, retrospective analysis on 685 patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo Catalano; Francesca Bergamo; Chiara Cremolini; Bruno Vincenzi; Francesca Negri; Paolo Giordani; Paolo Alessandroni; Rossana Intini; Silvia Stragliotto; Daniele Rossini; Beatrice Borelli; Daniele Santini; Donatella Sarti; Marco B L Rocchi; Sara Lonardi; Alfredo Falcone; Vittorina Zagonel; Rodolfo Mattioli; Francesco Graziano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Oncogene addiction to GNAS in GNASR201 mutant tumors.

Authors:  Aditya More; Ichiaki Ito; Valsala Haridas; Saikat Chowdhury; Yue Gu; Princess Dickson; Natalie Fowlkes; John Paul Shen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 8.756

3.  Improved chemosensitivity following mucolytic therapy in patient-derived models of mucinous appendix cancer.

Authors:  Ashok K Dilly; Brendon D Honick; Robin Frederick; Anuleka Elapavaluru; Sachin Velankar; Hima Makala; T Kevin Hitchens; Lesley M Foley; Jianxia Guo; Jan H Beumer; Lora Heather Rigatti; Yong J Lee; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  Development of a miRNA-based classifier for detection of colorectal cancer molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Ronja S Adam; Dennis Poel; Leandro Ferreira Moreno; Joey M A Spronck; Tim R de Back; Arezo Torang; Patricia M Gomez Barila; Sanne Ten Hoorn; Florian Markowetz; Xin Wang; Henk M W Verheul; Tineke E Buffart; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.449

5.  Clinicopathological characterization of SMAD4-mutated intestinal adenocarcinomas: A case-control study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Liao; Yansheng Hao; Xiaofei Zhang; Stephen Ward; Jane Houldsworth; Alexandros D Polydorides; Noam Harpaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  KRAS status is related to histological phenotype in gastric cancer: results from a large multicentre study.

Authors:  Lindsay C Hewitt; Yuichi Saito; Tan Wang; Yoko Matsuda; Jan Oosting; Arnaldo N S Silva; Hayley L Slaney; Veerle Melotte; Gordon Hutchins; Patrick Tan; Takaki Yoshikawa; Tomio Arai; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Prognostic role and clinicopathological features of SMAD4 gene mutation in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tian Fang; Tingting Liang; Yizhuo Wang; Haitao Wu; Shuhan Liu; Linying Xie; Jiaying Liang; Chang Wang; Yehui Tan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Rational application of targeted therapeutics in mucinous colon/appendix cancers with positive predictive factors.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Dilly; Brendon D Honick; Yong J Lee; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Hoorn; Tim R de Back; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Risk Factors for Recurrence of Radically Resected Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Huang; Min-Hong Zou; Jian-Chang Wei; Ye Jiang; Zhuan-Peng Chen; Qiang Wang; Wang-Lin Li; Jie Cao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.