| Literature DB >> 30205447 |
Kristián Máthis1,2, Michal Köver3, Jitka Stráská4, Zuzanka Trojanová5, Ján Džugan6, Kristýna Halmešová7.
Abstract
Commercially available AZ31 magnesium alloy was four times extruded in an equal rectangular channel using three different routes (A, B, and C). Micro tensile deformation tests were performed at room temperature with the aim to reveal any plastic anisotropy developed during the extrusion. Samples for micro tensile experiments were cut from extruded billets in different orientations with respect to the pressing direction. Information about the microstructure of samples was obtained using the electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) technique. Deformation characteristics (yield stress, ultimate tensile stress and uniform elongation) exhibited significant anisotropy as a consequence of different orientations between the stress direction and texture and thus different deformation mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: equal channel angular pressing; magnesium alloy; miniaturized tensile tests; processing route; slip systems; twinning
Year: 2018 PMID: 30205447 PMCID: PMC6163549 DOI: 10.3390/ma11091644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1SEM micrographs of the cast alloy before annealing (a) and after annealing (b).
Figure 2(a) The sample coordinate system and the orientation of the specimens. (b) Dimensions of the specimens used for micro-tensile tests.
Figure 3Inverse pole figure maps obtained for the particular planes and ECAP routes.
Average grain sizes and fractions of high angle grain boundaries for particular ECAP routes and planes, as estimated from EBSD measurements.
| Route/Plane | TD | ND | ED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAP Route | Grain Size (µm) | Fraction of HAGBs | Grain Size (µm) | Fraction of HAGBs | Grain Size (µm) | Fraction of HAGBs |
| A | 3.57 | 85.5% | 4.20 | 89.7% | 3.98 | 91.0% |
| BC | 3.43 | 92.1% | 3.48 | 93.8% | 3.37 | 90.2% |
| C | 3.97 | 86.9% | 4.33 | 89.5% | 4.81 | 89.6% |
Figure 4Average grain sizes of the particular samples (a). Grain size distributions for the particular ECAP routes in the transversal plane (b), normal plane (c) and extrusion plane (d).
Figure 5(0001) EBSD pole figures for the TD plane and the corresponding schemes of the prevailing grain orientations.
Figure 6Stress-strain curves (a–c) for particular routes as a function of the tensile direction and (e–g) for the particular directions as a function of ECAP routes.
Mechanical characteristics as a function of the processing route and direction of the tensile testing.
| Route | Plane | Yield Stress (σ02) | Ultimate Tensile Strength (σmax) | Uniform Elongation (εu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [MPa] | [MPa] | [%] | ||
| Route A | TD | 201 | 275 | 4.4 |
| ND | 117 | 264 | 9.4 | |
| ED | 144 | 253 | 8.8 | |
| Route Bc | TD | 160 | 261 | 5.9 |
| ND | 131 | 242 | 8.7 | |
| Route C | TD | 231 | 295 | 3.9 |
| ND | 103 | 216 | 9.9 | |
| ED | 112 | 236 | 11.8 | |
| Initial | - | 57 | 195 | 8.1 |
Schmid factors for the particular deformation mechanisms in particular billet planes calculated for uniaxial tension.
| Plane_Route | Basal Slip | Prismatic Slip | Pyramidal < | Extension Twinning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD_A | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.03 |
| TD_B | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.43 | 0.02 |
| TD_C | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.15 |
| ND_A | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| ND_B | 0.23 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.24 |
| ND_C | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.29 |
| ED_A | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0 |
| ED_B | 0.20 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.36 |
| ED_C | 0.37 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0 |
Figure 7Dependence of the yield stress on the Schmid factor for (a) the basal -slip, (b) the prismatic -slip; and(c) extension twinning.
Figure 8Dependence of the uniform elongation on the Schmid factor for (a) the basal -slip, (b) the prismatic -slip and (c) extension twinning.