| Literature DB >> 30205242 |
Niels Ramsing Holm1, Lene Nyhus Andreasen2, Simon Walsh3, Olli A Kajander4, Nils Witt5, Christian Eek6, Paul Knaapen7, Lukasz Koltowski8, Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico9, Francesco Burzotta10, Janusz Kockman8, John Ormiston11, Irene Santos-Pardo5, Peep Laanmets12, Darren Mylotte13, Morten Madsen14, Jakob Hjort15, Indulis Kumsars16, Truls Råmunddal2, Evald Høj Christiansen2.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention in complex bifurcation lesions is prone to suboptimal implantation results and is associated with increased risk of subsequent clinical events. Angiographic ambiguity is high during bifurcation stenting, but it is unknown if procedural guidance by intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) improves clinical outcome. Methods and Design: OCTOBER is a randomized, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial aimed to show superiority of OCT-guided stent implantation compared to standard angiographic-guided implantation in bifurcation lesions. The primary outcome measure is a 2-year composite end point of cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The calculated sample size is 1,200 patients in total, and allocation is 1:1. Eligible patients have stable or unstable angina pectoris or stabilized non–ST elevation myocardial infarction, and a coronary bifurcation lesion with significant main vessel stenosis and more than 50 % stenosis in a side branch with a reference diameter ≥2.5mm. Treatment is performed by the provisional side branch stenting technique or 2-stent techniques, and the systematic OCT guiding protocol is aimed to evaluate (1) plaque preparation, (2) lesion length, (3) segmental reference sizes, (4) lesion coverage, (5) stent expansion, (6) malapposition, (7) wire positions, and (8) ostial results. Implications: A positive outcome of the OCTOBER trial may establish OCT as a routine tool for optimization of complex percutaneous coronary intervention, whereas a negative result would indicate that OCT remains a tool for ad hoc evaluation in selected cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30205242 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Heart J ISSN: 0002-8703 Impact factor: 4.749