William Busse1, Geoffrey Chupp2, Hiroyuki Nagase3, Frank C Albers4, Scott Doyle5, Qin Shen6, Daniel J Bratton7, Necdet B Gunsoy5. 1. Department of Medicine, Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis. Electronic address: wwb@medicine.wisc.edu. 2. Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. 3. Teikyo University School of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Respiratory Medical Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC. 5. Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom. 6. Analytics and Innovation, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pa. 7. Clinical Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three anti-IL-5 pathway-directed therapies are approved for use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA); however, no head-to-head comparison data are available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of licensed doses of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and reslizumab in patients with SEA, according to baseline blood eosinophil counts. METHODS: This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) used data from a Cochrane review and independent searches. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials in patients aged 12 years or greater with SEA. End points included annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations and change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire score and FEV1. An ITC was performed in patients with Asthma Control Questionnaire scores of 1.5 or greater and stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. All treatments significantly reduced the rate of clinically significant exacerbations and improved asthma control versus placebo in all blood eosinophil count subgroups. Mepolizumab reduced clinically significant exacerbations by 34% to 45% versus benralizumab across subgroups (rate ratio ≥400 cells/μL: 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.87]; ≥300 cells/μL: 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37-0.99]; and ≥150 cells/μL: 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.89]; all P < .05) and by 45% versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]; P = .007). Asthma control was significantly improved with mepolizumab versus benralizumab (all subgroups: P < .05) and versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (P = .004). Benralizumab significantly improved lung function versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: This ITC of the licensed doses suggests that mepolizumab was associated with significantly greater improvements in clinically significant exacerbations and asthma control compared with reslizumab or benralizumab in patients with similar blood eosinophil counts.
BACKGROUND: Three anti-IL-5 pathway-directed therapies are approved for use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA); however, no head-to-head comparison data are available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of licensed doses of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and reslizumab in patients with SEA, according to baseline blood eosinophil counts. METHODS: This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) used data from a Cochrane review and independent searches. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials in patients aged 12 years or greater with SEA. End points included annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations and change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire score and FEV1. An ITC was performed in patients with Asthma Control Questionnaire scores of 1.5 or greater and stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. All treatments significantly reduced the rate of clinically significant exacerbations and improved asthma control versus placebo in all blood eosinophil count subgroups. Mepolizumab reduced clinically significant exacerbations by 34% to 45% versus benralizumab across subgroups (rate ratio ≥400 cells/μL: 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.87]; ≥300 cells/μL: 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37-0.99]; and ≥150 cells/μL: 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.89]; all P < .05) and by 45% versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]; P = .007). Asthma control was significantly improved with mepolizumab versus benralizumab (all subgroups: P < .05) and versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (P = .004). Benralizumab significantly improved lung function versus reslizumab in the 400 cells/μL or greater subgroup (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: This ITC of the licensed doses suggests that mepolizumab was associated with significantly greater improvements in clinically significant exacerbations and asthma control compared with reslizumab or benralizumab in patients with similar blood eosinophil counts.
Authors: Salman Siddiqui; Loren C Denlinger; Stephen J Fowler; Praveen Akuthota; Dominick E Shaw; Liam G Heaney; Louise Brown; Mario Castro; Tonya A Winders; Monica Kraft; Scott Wagers; Michael C Peters; Ian D Pavord; Samantha Walker; Nizar N Jarjour Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kim S LeMessurier; Robert Rooney; Hazem E Ghoneim; Baoming Liu; Kui Li; Heather S Smallwood; Amali E Samarasinghe Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Karina T Barretto; Rebecca A Brockman-Schneider; Ine Kuipers; Sarmila Basnet; Yury A Bochkov; Matthew C Altman; Nizar N Jarjour; James E Gern; Stephane Esnault Journal: Allergy Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Stephane Esnault; Jonathan P Leet; Mats W Johansson; Karina T Barretto; Paul S Fichtinger; Frances J Fogerty; Ksenija Bernau; Sameer K Mathur; Deane F Mosher; Nathan Sandbo; Nizar N Jarjour Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 5.018