| Literature DB >> 30204830 |
Yao-Ting Huang1, Wei-Yao Chuang1, Bing-Ching Ho2, Zong-Yen Wu3,4, Rita C Kuo3, Mengwei Ko5, Po-Yu Liu6,7,8,9.
Abstract
Raoultella planticola is an emerging zoonotic pathogen that is associated with rare but life-threatening cases of bacteremia, biliary tract infections, and urinary tract infections. Moreover, increasing antimicrobial resistance in the organism poses a potential threat to public health. In spite of its importance as a human pathogen, the genome of R. planticola remains largely unexplored and little is known about its virulence factors. Although lipopolysaccharides has been detected in R. planticola and implicated in the virulence in earlier studies, the genetic background is unknown. Here, we report the complete genome and comparative analysis of the multidrug-resistant clinical isolate R. planticola GODA. The complete genome sequence of R. planticola GODA was sequenced using single-molecule real-time DNA sequencing. Comparative genomic analysis reveals distinct capsular polysaccharide synthesis gene clusters in R. planticola GODA. In addition, we found bla TEM-57 and multiple transporters related to multidrug resistance. The availability of genomic data in open databases of this emerging zoonotic pathogen, in tandem with our comparative study, provides better understanding of R. planticola and the basis for future work.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30204830 PMCID: PMC6135345 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760180192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Features of Raoultella planticola strains in the study
| Strain | Site of isolation | Country of origin | Genome assembly status | Genome size (bp) | GC content (%) | CDSs (pseudo genes) | rRNA operons | tRNAs |
| GODA | Human | Taiwan | Complete | 5,592,163 | 55.4 | 5,461(703) | 25 | 83 |
| ATCC 33531 | Radish root | Unknown | Contig | 5,668,028 | 55.8 | 5,363(193) | 5 | 67 |
| CHB | River | USA | Contig | 5,780,876 | 55.4 | 5,501(210) | 24 | 77 |
| FDAARGOS_64 | Human | USA | Contig | 5,823,731 | 55.6 | 5,541(312) | 25 | 86 |
| 1175_2058 | Human | USA | Contig | 5,750,464 | 55.7 | 5,486(96) | 19 | 71 |
| 626_SENT | Human | USA | Scaffold | 5,735,751 | 55.5 | 5,544(233) | 3 | 28 |
| INSali127 | Vegetable | Portugal | Scaffold | 6,011,051 | 55.5 | 5,843(211) | 5 | 72 |
| INSali133 | Vegetable | Portugal | Scaffold | 6,011,836 | 55.5 | 5,840(220) | 5 | 74 |
CDSs: coding sequences; GC: guanine-cytosine.
Fig. 1:circular genomes representation map and genome comparison of Raoultella planticola (GODA, 1175_2058, 626_SENT, ATCC 33531, CHB, FDAARGOS_64, INSali127, INSali133). Predicted coding sequences (CDSs) are assigned various colors with respect to cellular functions. Circles show from the outermost to the innermost: (1) DNA coordinates; (2, 3). Function-based color-coded mapping of the CDSs predicted on the forward and reverse strands of the R. planticola GODA genome, respectively; (4) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola 1175_2058; (5) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola 1175_2058; (6) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola 626_SENT; (7) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola 626_SENT; (8) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola ATCC 33531; (9) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola ATCC 33531; (10) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola CHB; (11) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola CHB; (12) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola FDAARGOS_64; (13) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola FDAARGOS_64; (14) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola INSali127; (15) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola INSali127; (16) Orthologous CDSs shared between R. planticola GODA and R. planticola INSali133; (17) R. planticola GODA-specific CDSs, compared with R. planticola INSali133; (18) GC plot with regions above and below average in green and violet; (19) GC skew showing regions above and below average in yellow and light blue. This figure was plotted in Scalable Vector Graphics format via an in-house script, which calculates the radius and ribbon width according to the BLAST alignments and adds colors by COG classification of all orthogonal genes.
Fig. 2:comparison of the gene contents of the Raoultella planticola. (A) Venn diagram showing the numbers of conserved and strain-specific coding sequences (CDSs). 4,382 core genes shared across all strains, whereas 147 genes were specific to R. planticola GODA. (B) COG category-based functional analysis of GODA-specific CDSs. This figure was constructed using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Fig. 3:heat-map of average nucleotide identity values between each genome of Raoultella planticola strains and related species. R. planticola GODA is closely related to ATCC 33531, FDAARGOS_64, and CHB. This figure was depicted by OrthoANI (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/orthoani).
Fig. 4:genomic comparison of the cps gene cluster in Raoultella planticola reveals genetic diversity. Gene clusters are shown in gray. Strain specific wzx genes are marked in red color. GT: glycosyltransferase. This figure was constructed using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Phenotypic resistance profile and putative resistance determinant in strain GODA
| Antimicrobial agents (Subclasses) | MIC (µg/mL) | Interpretation | Putative resistance determinant |
| β-lactams |
| ||
| Ampicillin/sulbactam | ≥ 32 | R | |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam | ≥ 128 | R | |
| Cefazolin | ≥ 64 | R | |
| Cefoperazone/Sulbactam | ≥ 64 | R | |
| Ceftazidime | ≥ 64 | R | |
| Ceftriaxone | ≥ 64 | R | |
| Cefepime | ≥ 64 | R | |
| Imipenem | 4 | R | |
| Ertapenem | 2 | R | |
| Aminoglycosides | |||
| Gentamicin | 8 | I | |
| Amikacin | ≤ 2 | S | |
| Folate pathway inhibitors | sul3 | ||
| Trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole | ≥ 320 | R | |
| Fluoroquinolone | mdtK | ||
| Ciprofloxacin | 1 | S |
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration.