Jacob S Nasser1, Helen E Huetteman1, Ting-Ting Chung1, Kevin C Chung1. 1. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unplanned emergency department visits are often overlooked as an indicator of care quality. The authors' objectives were to (1) determine the rate of 30-day emergency department visits following mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, (2) perform a risk analysis of potential factors associated with emergency department return, and (3) assess for potentially preventable visits with a focus on returns for pain. METHODS: Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data, the authors identified adult women who underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk of unplanned emergency department visits. The authors identified and sorted diagnostic codes to investigate why patients were seeking emergency department care. In addition, the authors performed a subgroup analysis on patients returning with a pain-related diagnosis to evaluate risk. RESULTS: Of 159,275 cases of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, 4917 (3.1 percent) experienced an unplanned return to the emergency department within 30 days of operation. A substantial proportion of those who returned (23 percent) presented with a pain-related diagnosis. Only 0.9 percent of cases with a 30-day emergency department return were readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous patients return to the emergency department within 30 days of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. There is a need for policy makers and physicians to implement strategies to reduce discretionary emergency department use, specifically among younger or publicly insured patients. Combining unplanned emergency department visits with readmission rates as a care quality indicator warrants consideration. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
BACKGROUND: Unplanned emergency department visits are often overlooked as an indicator of care quality. The authors' objectives were to (1) determine the rate of 30-day emergency department visits following mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, (2) perform a risk analysis of potential factors associated with emergency department return, and (3) assess for potentially preventable visits with a focus on returns for pain. METHODS: Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data, the authors identified adult women who underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk of unplanned emergency department visits. The authors identified and sorted diagnostic codes to investigate why patients were seeking emergency department care. In addition, the authors performed a subgroup analysis on patients returning with a pain-related diagnosis to evaluate risk. RESULTS: Of 159,275 cases of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, 4917 (3.1 percent) experienced an unplanned return to the emergency department within 30 days of operation. A substantial proportion of those who returned (23 percent) presented with a pain-related diagnosis. Only 0.9 percent of cases with a 30-day emergency department return were readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous patients return to the emergency department within 30 days of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. There is a need for policy makers and physicians to implement strategies to reduce discretionary emergency department use, specifically among younger or publicly insured patients. Combining unplanned emergency department visits with readmission rates as a care quality indicator warrants consideration. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Authors: Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Elisa Prieto-Lara; Antonio Rueda-Domínguez; Claudio Maañón-Di Leo; Nicolás Benítez-Parejo; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Francisco J Medina-Cano; Emilio Perea-Milla Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Bryan Dowd; Medha Karmarker; Tami Swenson; Shriram Parashuram; Robert Kane; Robert Coulam; Molly Moore Jeffery Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Laura A Graham; Karishma Desai; Tyler S Wahl; Elise Aucoin; Joshua S Richman; Melanie S Morris; Kamal M Itani; Gordon L Telford; Mary T Hawn Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alexander J Kammien; Anoop R Galivanche; Michael J Gouzoulis; Harold G Moore; Michael R Mercier; Jonathan N Grauer Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2022-05-11
Authors: Jacob S Nasser; William H J Chung; Ryan A Gudal; Sandra V Kotsis; Adeyiza O Momoh; Kevin C Chung Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Justin M Broyles; Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Laura S Dominici; Andrea L Pusic; Ian J Saldanha Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Alexander J Kammien; Justin R Zhu; Michael J Gouzoulis; Harold G Moore; Anoop R Galivanche; Michael J Medvecky; Jonathan N Grauer Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-03-21
Authors: Merel H J Hazewinkel; Remco R Berendsen; Rik C J van Klink; Hans Dik; Jeroen Wink; Jerry Braun; Robert A F de Lind van Wijngaarden Journal: JTCVS Open Date: 2021-08-21