Dewen Meng1, Xingfeng Li1, Markus Bauer1, John-Paul Taylor1, Dorothee P Auer1. 1. From the Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine (D.M., X.L., D.P.A.), and School of Psychology (M.B.), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Derby Rd, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England (D.M., X.L., D.P.A.); and Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, England (J.P.T.).
Cholinergic deficits are a hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD). The link between
cholinergic deficits and cognitive impairment is well established (1) and cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are the
mainstay symptomatic pharmacotherapy, with moderate effectiveness in established AD
(2). However, only 18%–48% patients
undergoing treatment show clinically significant improvement, and about 7% of
patients develop adverse effects severe enough to stop the treatment (3). Additionally, no clinical effect has been
established in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (4).Individual diagnosis of central cholinergic deficits could be beneficial to address
the lack of treatment response in MCI and the variable treatment response in
established AD. Conceivably, increasing the cholinergic tone in patients without a
cholinergic deficit is unlikely to lead to cognitive improvement, and conversely may
make patients particularly prone to adverse effects (5). Several markers of cholinergic deficits were previously proposed
(6–9). However, none of these markers gained widespread use because they
are too expensive or invasive, lack robustness, or are not widely available. It
would be advantageous to identify a simple and fast MRI test to reliably map
cholinergic deficits as part of the routine MRI work-up (10). Additionally, it has been suggested that high-dose ChEI
may be more efficacious for AD (11),
increasing the need for a robust cholinergic biomarker to assist selection of
candidates for potentially more aggressive ChEI treatment.The nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) provides the primary source of cholinergic
inputs to the cerebral cortex and its widespread projections form the NBM
cholinergic network (12). Resting-state
functional connectivity (FC) mapping of NBM cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC)
has been demonstrated in healthy people (13),
suggesting that it is possible to use NBM FC to delineate cholinergic deficits in AD
and MCI. NBM FC has a number of key advantages for potential clinical use because of
its noninvasive nature and expected high specificity to map cholinergic pathways,
given that over 90% of NBM neurons are cholinergic (12). Taken together, NBM FC may probe the central cholinergic
dysfunction and underlying neuronal degeneration so that we may be able to identify
those people most likely to benefit from treatment with ChEI.We hypothesized that reductions of NBM FC are a feature of MCI and AD; underlie
cognitive impairment across the cognitively normal, MCI, and dementia spectrum not
treated with ChEI; can be partially reversed with ChEI; and predict treatment
response to ChEI in MCI and AD. We then undertook a series of posthoc tests to
address the role of concurrent use of anticholinergic drugs, presence of
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid pathology, apolipoprotein E
(APOE) ε4 genotype, and disease progression.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (available at
). The ADNI was
launched in 2003 as a public-private partnership, led by Principal Investigator
Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI has been to test whether serial
MRI, PET, other biologic markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessment
can be combined to measure the progression of MCI and early AD. Written informed
consent was obtained from all individuals.Data were selected based on the availability of resting-state functional MRI data
and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) at
both screening and 6 months after initiation of ChEI. As described in the ADNI
visit schedule, the maximum interval between baseline and screening visits was
prescribed as 28 days. A total of 175 participants (34 healthy control
participants, 59 patients with early MCI, 48 patients with late MCI, and 34
patients with AD) were included in this study (details of diagnostic criteria in
Appendix E1
[online]). Demographic and clinical information was used to screen for existing
pathologies, dementia diagnosis, and medication history (14). All participants completed a series of cognitive
assessments and we chose ADAS-Cog to reflect cognitive function. ADAS-Cog
comprises a comprehensive assessment of cognitive functions including memory and
executive function that are linked with cholinergic function (15) and is commonly used as a primary
outcome neuropsychological measure for AD clinical trials.Information of dosing schedules for ChEI, memantine, and medications with
potential anticholinergic effect was manually extracted (details in Appendix E1 [online]). At
the screening visit, five patients with early MCI (8.5%), three patients with
late MCI (6.3%), and all patients with AD were already taking ChEI. Five healthy
control participants (14.7%), nine patients with early MCI (15.2%), four
patients with late MCI (8.3%), and five patients with AD (14.7%) were taking
anticholinergic drugs. One patient with late MCI (2.1%) and two patients with AD
(5.9%) were taking memantine at the screening visit. Eight patients with early
MCI (13.6%) and 13 patients with late MCI (30.2%) were prescribed ChEI after the
screening visit.To explore interactions between NBM FC and genotype or amyloid pathology as
potential confounding factors (16,17), we manually extracted the status of
APOE ε4 genotype and presence of CSF amyloid-β
42 from . Participants were
designated as APOE ε4 carriers if they had one or two
copies of allele 4, and as noncarriers if they had no allele 4 in their
genotype. CSF amyloid-β 42, rather than amyloid PET, was chosen to reflect
abnormal amyloid accumulation, given that it has been recently shown that CSF
amyloid-β 42 becomes abnormal in the earliest stages of AD before amyloid
PET starts (18). The cutoffs for abnormal
CSF amyloid-β 42 used in this study were as follows: normal CSF
amyloid-β 42 (participants with negative CSF Aβ 42 status) greater
than 201.6 ng/L, and abnormal amyloid-β 42 (participants with positive CSF
Aβ 42 status) less than 182.4 ng/L (18). Thirteen participants did not have APOE
data.
Resting-State Functional MRI Acquisition and Quality Assessment
Protocol
All participants were imaged with a 3.0-T Philips MR unit at multiple sites with
the same ADNI 3.0-T imaging protocol. Participants were instructed to keep their
eyes open during imaging. The data had been acquired by using a standard
echo-planar imaging functional MRI protocol (repetition time msec/echo time
msec, 3000/30; flip angle, 80°; number of sections, 48; section thickness,
3.3 mm; 140 volumes; spatial resolution, 3 × 3 × 3 mm3;
matrix, 64 × 64).To account for possible artifacts resulting from micromotion, a rigorous protocol
of data quality assessment was applied, modified from a multicenter functional
MRI protocol (19), resulting in a final
data set of 168 participants (33 healthy control participants, 59 patients with
early MCI, 43 patients with late MCI, and 33 patients with AD). Good-quality
functional MRI images 6 months after ChEI initiation were available in 12
patients with late MCI and in six patients with early MCI. Table 1 summarizes demographic, clinical,
APOE ε4 status, Aβ-42 status, and cognitive
information of the included participants.
Table 1:
Demographics and Clinical and Cognitive Information
Note.—Unless otherwise specified, data are means ±
standard deviations. AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog =
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ChEI
= cholinesterase inhibitor, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid, HC
= healthy control participants, MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.
*Data are numbers, with percentages in parentheses.
†Significant level at P ˂
.05.
‡In total, eight patients with early MCI and 13
patients with late MCI had ADAS-Cog score 6 months after undergoing
ChEI treatment. Among these patients, six patients with early MCI
and 12 patients with late MCI patients had good-quality
resting-state functional MR images at 6 months after undergoing ChEI
treatment.
Demographics and Clinical and Cognitive InformationNote.—Unless otherwise specified, data are means ±
standard deviations. AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog =
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ChEI
= cholinesterase inhibitor, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid, HC
= healthy control participants, MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.*Data are numbers, with percentages in parentheses.†Significant level at P ˂
.05.‡In total, eight patients with early MCI and 13
patients with late MCI had ADAS-Cog score 6 months after undergoing
ChEI treatment. Among these patients, six patients with early MCI
and 12 patients with late MCI patients had good-quality
resting-state functional MR images at 6 months after undergoing ChEI
treatment.
Seed-based FC Analysis
Seed-based FC analysis, which identifies the pattern of brain areas displaying
correlated time series with respect to a predefined region, was carried out with
software (FMRI Expert Analysis Tool [FEAT], version 6.0) in FSL (version 5.0.10;
)
(20) by manually creating a mask (16
voxels, 581 mm3) in the NBM on functional MRI data sets for each
participant. The approach of seed-based analysis and the method of testing the
robustness of manual seed region selection are provided in Appendix E2 (online).
Standard statistical Z transformation was applied to the
correlation coefficient of the time series between NBM and the rest of the brain
in FSL (15); thus, a normal distributed
score was computed to index NBM FC.
Statistical Analysis
One-way analysis of variance and χ2 test in SPSS (version 21;
SPSS, Chicago, Ill) were used to compare demographics and cognitive performance
between healthy control participants, patients with early MCI, patients with
late MCI, and patients with AD. Statistical significance was set at
P ˂ .05.All main statistical tests and secondary posthoc tests were voxel based and
corrected for multiple tests as implemented in FSL. Inference on first-level
analysis was based on Z statistical images of each individual
thresholded at Z greater than 2.3 and a corrected cluster
significance threshold of P ˂ .05. Z
statistical images of voxel-based high-level analyses were estimated based on
Z greater than 1.96, and a familywise
error–corrected cluster significance threshold of P
˂ .05. Age and mean relative displacement, which is the net amount of
motion between consecutive functional volumes (21), were treated as further between-participant covariates of no
interest in all higher-level analyses and was carried out by using
FMRIB’s Local Analysis of Mixed Effects (FLAME) (20) in FSL. Additional outlier de-weighting in FEAT was
used to automatically detect and account for outlier data points for each
voxel.Posthoc Shapiro-Wilk tests in SPSS were undertaken on Z scores
extracted from results of the main tests for the four hypotheses (described
next) to test for normality.To test hypothesis 1—that NBM FC is lower in patients with MCI and
patients with AD compared with healthy control participants with normal
cognitive function—we undertook a voxel-based F test to
compare the NBM FC maps between groups (healthy control participants, patients
with MCI, and patients with AD) by using multiple test correction within FEAT in
FSL. Posthoc pairwise t tests (healthy control participants vs
patients with MCI and healthy control participants vs patients with AD) were
then used to determine the direction of the effect if the F
test was significant. Significant level of the t tests was at
corrected P ˂ .025. Posthoc tests were performed in
cohorts not taking anticholinergic drugs, and to explore the effects of
APOE and Aβ status.To investigate hypothesis 2—that NBM FC correlates with cognitive
performance but in the absence of an a priori hypothesis of the specific regions
affected within the NBM network—we undertook voxel-based correlation
analysis of NBM FC maps with ADAS-Cog in the study population not taking ChEI.
Posthoc tests included correlation analysis in the subgroup of participants not
taking anticholinergic drugs to prevent possible medication-induced confounding
effects.To study hypothesis 3—that ChEI would increase NBM FC without an a priori
hypothesis of where these effects would be—we again used voxel-based
change analysis of NBM FC maps comparing before ChEI treatment and 6 months
after ChEI initiation in 18 patients with MCI (voxel-based paired
t test FEAT in FSL corrected for multiple comparisons). In
view of the naturalistic study design, we sought to control for possible disease
progression effects that might confound our change analysis. Hence, we assessed
possible serial disease progression effects of NBM FC maps over an interval of 6
months in a matched (for age, sex, and disease severity) group of 18 patients
with MCI (six with early MCI and 12 with late MCI) who did not undergo ChEI
treatment in the interval by using voxel-based paired t test in
FEAT as posthoc test.Last, we studied the hypothesis that low NBM FC would predict the cognitive
response to ChEI. We used voxel-wise correlation analysis of baseline NBM FC
maps with changes of ADAS-Cog 6 months after initiating ChEI. Again, because of
the naturalistic study design, we assessed whether NBM FC at baseline might also
predict cognitive change in an untreated cohort (posthoc test).
Results
A total of 168 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 73.8 years ±
7.7; 87 women [51.8%] and 81 men [49.2]) were included. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the participant selection.
Healthy control participants were significantly older than were patients with MCI
and patients with AD (P = .03) (Table 1). The manual method to define NBM FC maps was
considered robust (Appendix
E2 [online]).
Figure 1:
Flowchart shows participant selection. AC = anticholinergic treatment,
AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer’s Disease
Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ADNI = Alzheimer’s Disease
Neuroimaging Initiative, ChEI = cholinesterase inhibitor, EMCI =
early mild cognitive impairment, HC = healthy control participants,
LMCI = late mild cognitive impairment, MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.
Flowchart shows participant selection. AC = anticholinergic treatment,
AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer’s Disease
Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ADNI = Alzheimer’s Disease
Neuroimaging Initiative, ChEI = cholinesterase inhibitor, EMCI =
early mild cognitive impairment, HC = healthy control participants,
LMCI = late mild cognitive impairment, MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.
NBM FC Pattern in Healthy Aging and Abnormalities in MCI and AD
In healthy control participants, the NBM was functionally connected with the
anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral hippocampi, caudate, medial frontal gyri,
insular cortex, superior temporal gyri, and occipital lobes (Fig 2, ). Patients with
MCI (Fig 2, ) and
patients with AD (Fig 2,
) showed qualitatively similar NBM FC patterns but
additional NBM FC was seen in AD with the bilateral occipital lobes, bilateral
medial temporal gyri, and posterior cingulate cortex. F test
showed a significant between-group difference of NBM FC between healthy control
participants, patients with MCI, and patients with AD (Fig E1 [online]). By
using further pairwise t tests, we found that patients with MCI
at baseline had decreased NBM FC in the anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral
hippocampus, bilateral caudate, bilateral insular cortex, bilateral superior and
medial temporal gyri, and bilateral occipital lobes, compared with healthy
control participants (Fig 2,
; Table
2). Also, group comparison confirmed significantly increased NBM FC with
the right hippocampus, left middle and inferior frontal gyri, and bilateral
superior temporal gyrus in patients with AD compared with healthy control
participants (Fig 2, ;
Table 2) when age and mean relative
displacement were controlled.
Figure 2:
Images show functional connectivity (FC) mapping of nucleus basalis of
Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC) (whole cohort) in,
A, healthy aging (healthy control participants
[HC], n = 33; corrected P ˂
.05) and also shows seed mask (green), B, in patients
with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 102;
corrected P ˂ .05), and, C, in
patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 33;
corrected P ˂ .05). Significance was set at
P ˂ .05. D, Difference NBM
FC map between MCI and HC (blue-light blue indicates reductions in MCI;
pairwise t test, corrected P ˂
.025). E, Difference NBM FC between late MCI (LMCI) and
early MCI (EMCI) (blue-light blue indicates reductions in LMCI; posthoc
pairwise t test, P ˂ .05).
F, Difference NBM FC between AD and HC (red-yellow
indicates increased FC in AD; pairwise t test,
corrected P ˂ .025). All results were masked by
gray matter masks obtained from Montreal Neurological Institute 152
standard-space T1-weighted average structural template image. All
t test analyses were controlled for age and mean
relative displacement.
Table 2:
Brain Regions Where NBM FC Are Associated with Cognition and
Cholinesterase Inhibitory Effects
Note.—AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog =
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ChEI
= cholinesterase inhibitor, HC = healthy control
participants, FC = functional connectivity, MCI = mild
cognitive impairment, NBM = nucleus basalis of Meynert.
*All statistical images were thresholded at a familywise
error–corrected threshold of P ˂
.05.
Images show functional connectivity (FC) mapping of nucleus basalis of
Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC) (whole cohort) in,
A, healthy aging (healthy control participants
[HC], n = 33; corrected P ˂
.05) and also shows seed mask (green), B, in patients
with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 102;
corrected P ˂ .05), and, C, in
patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 33;
corrected P ˂ .05). Significance was set at
P ˂ .05. D, Difference NBM
FC map between MCI and HC (blue-light blue indicates reductions in MCI;
pairwise t test, corrected P ˂
.025). E, Difference NBM FC between late MCI (LMCI) and
early MCI (EMCI) (blue-light blue indicates reductions in LMCI; posthoc
pairwise t test, P ˂ .05).
F, Difference NBM FC between AD and HC (red-yellow
indicates increased FC in AD; pairwise t test,
corrected P ˂ .025). All results were masked by
gray matter masks obtained from Montreal Neurological Institute 152
standard-space T1-weighted average structural template image. All
t test analyses were controlled for age and mean
relative displacement.Brain Regions Where NBM FC Are Associated with Cognition and
Cholinesterase Inhibitory EffectsNote.—AD = Alzheimer disease, ADAS-Cog =
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, ChEI
= cholinesterase inhibitor, HC = healthy control
participants, FC = functional connectivity, MCI = mild
cognitive impairment, NBM = nucleus basalis of Meynert.*All statistical images were thresholded at a familywise
error–corrected threshold of P ˂
.05.
Effects of Age, Anticholinergic Drugs, Disease Progression, Genotype, and
Amyloid Pathology on NBM FC
We ran several posthoc analyses to explore possible moderator factors. In healthy
control participants and patients with MCI without ChEI or anticholinergic
drugs, there was no significant correlation between age and Z
score of clusters showing increased NBM FC in AD compared with healthy control
participants (P = .74).We repeated the between-group comparison after exclusion of participants who were
taking anticholinergic drugs, which revealed similar results as in the whole
cohort (Fig E2
[online]).To further explore the effects of disease progression without confounding effects
from ChEI or anticholinergic drugs, we also compared patients with untreated
early MCI and untreated late MCI. The results revealed a decreased NBM FC with
the right parietal lobe, right postcentral gyrus, right lateral occipital
cortex, right insula, and precuneus in late MCI compared with early MCI (age and
mean relative displacement–controlled, familywise error–corrected
P ˂ .05) (Fig 2,
; Table
2).To explore the effect of genotype and amyloid pathology on NBM FC without
confounding effects from ChEI or anticholinergic drugs, binary logistic
regression analyses between the status of APOE ε4,
amyloid-β 42 status, and Z scores of clusters showing
difference of NBM FC (healthy control participants vs patients with AD) were
conducted. No significant correlation was found between the Z
score of clusters showing increased NBM FC in AD and the status of
APOE ε4 (P = .26) or
amyloid-β 42 status (P = .27).
NBM FC and Cognitive Impairment
A significant but modest negative correlation (r =
−0.349; P ˂ .001) (Fig 3, Table 2) was found
between baseline ADAS-Cog and NBM FC with the posterior cingulate cortex,
anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral caudate, bilateral putamen, bilateral
thalamus, left insular cortex, left hippocampus, left middle frontal gyrus, and
right middle temporal gyrus in the group of participants not taking ChEI at
baseline (n = 127 [33 healthy control participants and 54
patients with MCI]). This correlation was largely unchanged when 16 participants
who were taking anticholinergic drugs were excluded (n =
111; r = −0.351; P ˂ .001)
(Fig E3
[online]).
Figure 3:
Images show functional connectivity (FC) mapping of nucleus basalis of
Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC) and cognition.
Negative correlation map between baseline Alzheimer’s Disease
Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and NBM FC located in
significant clusters (blue-light blue) in group of participants
including healthy control participants (HC), patients with early mild
cognitive impairment (EMCI), and patients with late mild cognitive
impairment (LMCI) who were not undergoing cholinesterase inhibitor
(ChEI) treatment (n = 127). All results were
masked by gray matter masks obtained from Montreal Neurological
Institute 152 standard-space T1-weighted average structural template
image. Scatterplot shows negative correlation between baseline ADAS-Cog
and FC between NBM and significant clusters. All analyses were
controlled for age and mean relative displacement. Significance was set
at corrected P ˂ .05. MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.
Images show functional connectivity (FC) mapping of nucleus basalis of
Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC) and cognition.
Negative correlation map between baseline Alzheimer’s Disease
Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and NBM FC located in
significant clusters (blue-light blue) in group of participants
including healthy control participants (HC), patients with early mild
cognitive impairment (EMCI), and patients with late mild cognitive
impairment (LMCI) who were not undergoing cholinesterase inhibitor
(ChEI) treatment (n = 127). All results were
masked by gray matter masks obtained from Montreal Neurological
Institute 152 standard-space T1-weighted average structural template
image. Scatterplot shows negative correlation between baseline ADAS-Cog
and FC between NBM and significant clusters. All analyses were
controlled for age and mean relative displacement. Significance was set
at corrected P ˂ .05. MCI = mild cognitive
impairment.To control for a possible general cognitive effect exerted by loss of global FC,
and specifically impaired FC in the posterior cingulate cortex, we investigated
whether posterior cingulate cortex or primary visual cortex FC was associated
with ADAS-Cog. No significant correlation between cognitive performance and
posterior cingulate cortex or primary visual cortex FC was identified,
supporting a weak but specific association between NBM FC and cognition.
NBM FC Changes after Initiation of ChEI
A total of 18 patients with MCI (mean age, 72.2 years ± 7.3; seven women
[38.9%] and 11 men [61%]; six with early MCI and twelve with late MCI) underwent
functional MRI before and 6 months after starting ChEI. Compared with
pretreatment, the 6-month follow-up images showed significantly increased FC
between NBM and the right putamen, right caudate, left superior frontal gyrus,
right middle frontal gyrus, and anterior cingulate cortex (corrected
P = .001) (Fig
4, Table 2). Because of the
naturalistic ADNI cohort design, the observed serial changes may be related to
disease progression rather than to ChEI treatment. To control for such
potentially confounding effects, we compared the baseline NBM FC in 18 patients
with untreated MCI (mean age, 72.8 years ± 5.1; seven women [38.9%] and 11
men [61%]; six with early MCI and 12 with late MCI) with their 6-month follow-up
NBM FC, which did not reveal significant changes.
Figure 4:
Images show serial changes in functional connectivity (FC) mapping of
nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC)
between baseline and 6 months after undergoing cholinesterase inhibitor
(ChEI) treatment in 18 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
NBM FC significantly increased from baseline to 6 months after ChEI in
right anterior striatum and prefrontal cortex (red-yellow). Box plot
shows distribution of strength of FC between NBM and significant
clusters (red-yellow) before and 6 months after ChEI, indexed as
Z score. All results were masked by gray matter
masks obtained from Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard-space
T1-weighted average structural template image. Significance level was at
familywise error–corrected P ˂ .05
(corrected for multiple comparisons) and corrected for age and mean
displacement.
Images show serial changes in functional connectivity (FC) mapping of
nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network (hereafter, NBM FC)
between baseline and 6 months after undergoing cholinesterase inhibitor
(ChEI) treatment in 18 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
NBM FC significantly increased from baseline to 6 months after ChEI in
right anterior striatum and prefrontal cortex (red-yellow). Box plot
shows distribution of strength of FC between NBM and significant
clusters (red-yellow) before and 6 months after ChEI, indexed as
Z score. All results were masked by gray matter
masks obtained from Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard-space
T1-weighted average structural template image. Significance level was at
familywise error–corrected P ˂ .05
(corrected for multiple comparisons) and corrected for age and mean
displacement.
NBM FC at Baseline to Predict Cognitive Outcome after ChEI
We then assessed the potential of baseline NBM FC to predict the cognitive
outcome after 6 months of ChEI. NBM FC in both the lateral cholinergic network
(left lateral occipital cortex) and the medial cholinergic network (left medial
frontal gyrus) was strongly and positively correlated with changes in ADAS-Cog
scores over 6 months of ChEI (R,
0.458; P = .001) (Fig 5,
; Table
2) in line with the hypothesis that lower FC may predict increased
benefits from ChEI. Unexpectedly, we also found a similarly strong
anticorrelation between NBM FC in the medial cholinergic network (anterior
cingulate cortex) and ADAS-Cog changes 6 months after starting ChEI
(R = 0.366;
P = .006) (Fig 5,
; Table
2). To further control for possible confounding predictor effects
associated with disease progression but unrelated to ChEI, we studied the
association between NBM FC at baseline and ADAS-Cog changes 6 months after
baseline in 21 patients with MCI who did not take ChEI in the interval, which
did not reveal significant associations. Additionally, to investigate whether
APOE ε4 or amyloid-β 42 status had an effect on
the predictive power of NBM FC on treatment response, the association between
the Z score of clustering showing positive correlation with
ADAS-Cog changes (Fig 5,
) and APOE ε4 and
amyloid-β 42 status was explored, but no significant results were revealed
(APOE ε4, P = .94;
amyloid-β 42 status, P = .25).
Figure 5:
Images show correlation between baseline functional connectivity (FC)
mapping of nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network
(hereafter, NBM FC) and changes of cognitive performance assessed by
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale
(ADAS-Cog) over 6 months of treatment with cholinesterase inhibitor.
A, Positive correlation between ADAS-Cog change
(posttreatment minus pretreatment; positive difference represents
worsening cognition) and baseline NBM FC (red) in patients with mild
cognitive impairment (MCI). Scatterplot illustrates positive correlation
for significant clusters. B, Negative correlation
between changes of ADAS-Cog and NBM FC (blue) at baseline in patients
with MCI. Scatterplot shows negative correlation in significant
clusters. Dotted lines in scatterplots indicate three-point change
(improve/decline) on ADAS-Cog, which is considered as clinically
relevant. All analyses were controlled for age and mean relative
displacement. All results were masked by gray matter masks obtained from
Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard-space T1-weighted average
structural template image. Significance level was at corrected
P ˂ .05.
Images show correlation between baseline functional connectivity (FC)
mapping of nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) cholinergic network
(hereafter, NBM FC) and changes of cognitive performance assessed by
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale
(ADAS-Cog) over 6 months of treatment with cholinesterase inhibitor.
A, Positive correlation between ADAS-Cog change
(posttreatment minus pretreatment; positive difference represents
worsening cognition) and baseline NBM FC (red) in patients with mild
cognitive impairment (MCI). Scatterplot illustrates positive correlation
for significant clusters. B, Negative correlation
between changes of ADAS-Cog and NBM FC (blue) at baseline in patients
with MCI. Scatterplot shows negative correlation in significant
clusters. Dotted lines in scatterplots indicate three-point change
(improve/decline) on ADAS-Cog, which is considered as clinically
relevant. All analyses were controlled for age and mean relative
displacement. All results were masked by gray matter masks obtained from
Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard-space T1-weighted average
structural template image. Significance level was at corrected
P ˂ .05.
Discussion
Our study investigated the potential of basal forebrain FC as a biomarker of
cholinergic dysfunction in MCI and early AD by using the publicly available ADNI
data sets. Seeding FC maps in the NBM allowed us to identify established cortical
and subcortical networks with known cholinergic innervation by the NBM. Four main
findings demonstrated diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker properties.
First, NBM FC was decreased in patients with untreated MCI, but was increased in
patients with early AD who were taking ChEI compared with the control group. Second,
global cognitive performance in healthy participants and patients with untreated MCI
was correlated with NBM FC predominantly in the default mode network. Third, the NBM
FC deficit was partially responsive to indirect cholinomimetic treatment in patients
with MCI, showing significant increases 6 months after ChEI initiation, but not in
an untreated parallel group. Fourth, baseline NBM FC strongly predicted cognitive
outcomes in patients with MCI 6 months after starting ChEI, but not in an untreated
parallel group.The pattern of cortical and subcortical NBM FC, including hubs of the default mode
and the salience networks and the bilateral caudate nuclei, is largely consistent
with the anatomic identification of the medial and lateral cholinergic pathways
(22) and a previous report in healthy
younger people (13). Specifically, the medial
cholinergic pathway matches the FC between NBM and medial prefrontal cortices,
anterior cingulate cortex, and subcortical regions. The capsular division of the
lateral cholinergic pathway is consistent with the FC between NBM and bilateral
hippocampi, as is the perisylvian division with the FC between NBM and bilateral
insula. Different from Li et al (13), we did
not find areas that were anticorrelated with NBM, which can be explained by the fact
that we avoided to regress out global signal changes, thereby minimizing spurious
negative cross-correlations between brain regions (23).Compared with healthy control participants, patients with MCI showed decreased NBM FC
within both the medial and lateral cholinergic system. This finding is well in line
with the early neurodegeneration of the NBM and several PET studies showing a
widespread reduction of acetylcholine activities in MCI (25,26). The results are
also in broad accordance with two recent NBM FC studies in MCI (27) and MCI in Parkinson disease (28) showing reduced NBM FC associated with
cognitive deficits. However, we found a more extended pattern of NBM FC deficit in
MCI compared with Li et al (27), which may be
related to our postprocessing method and the medication effects. Further decrease of
NBM FC in cases of late MCI versus early MCI supports the progressive nature of
cholinergic dysfunction.In a large group of healthy control participants and patients with MCI who were not
taking ChEI, we showed a significant but modest correlation between cognitive
performance and NBM FC within the medial and lateral cholinergic system. Findings
were not affected by excluding participants who were taking anticholinergic drugs.
The regions within the NBM FC network showing associations with cognitive
performance partly overlap with the default mode network such as the posterior
cingulate cortex and the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices. The pattern
identified and the direction of association provide further support for the
cholinergic hypothesis of dementia (2) in line
with previous studies showing reduced acetylcholine activities in multiple brain
regions by using PET imaging techniques (29,30).Interestingly, we did not find a further decrease of NBM FC in AD, but we observed an
increased NBM FC in patients with AD compared with healthy control participants.
This finding—at first surprising—may be related to a treatment effect,
as the ADNI repository only holds data from patients with AD already receiving
treatment with ChEI. In line with pharmacologic imaging studies showing increased
activation after cholinergic challenge (31,32), ChEI is expected to
increase the cholinergic tone and the NBM FC. However, this interpretation remains
speculative without comparison with NBM FC maps of patients with untreated AD.To further characterize a possible treatment effect, we studied serial NBM FC changes
between baseline and 6-month posttreatment data in a subgroup of patients with MCI.
This showed significantly increased NBM FC within the right putamen, right caudate,
left superior frontal gyrus, and right middle frontal gyrus compared with
pretreatment, suggesting at least partial restoration of cholinergic modulation of
neural activities. This result concords well with the expected treatment effects of
ChEI to restore synaptic activities within the cholinergic pathways and enhanced
brain activity as shown in pharmacologic functional MRI studies (33). Taken together, our results of increased
FC between NBM and left superior frontal gyrus and right middle frontal gyrus at
rest after ChEI treatment may explain increased task responsiveness shown previously
(33). However, in our study, we cannot
directly allocate the observed NBM FC change to a pharmacologic effect of ChEI
because of the naturalistic design. Nevertheless, in a matched cohort of patients
with untreated MCI, we did not find a serial effect of NBM FC over 6 months
supporting our interpretation that the observed NBM FC changes after ChEI reflect
cholinomimetic effects rather than the disease process.It would be clinically useful to identify patients who will benefit most from ChEI to
improve the treatment effectiveness in established AD, and to enable stratification
of patients with MCI for future treatment trials. Although clinical effectiveness of
ChEI has not been proven in patients with MCI, it is conceivable that only those
patients with MCI with reduced NBM FC may benefit more from ChEI. We observed a
pattern of reduced NBM FC at baseline that was associated with better cognitive
outcomes at 6 months after taking ChEI, mainly located in the left lateral occipital
cortex (lateral cholinergic pathway) and the left middle frontal gyrus (medial
cholinergic pathway), supporting the notion that imaging metrics have the potential
to predict the cognitive response to ChEI in MCI and AD (34,35). By contrast,
baseline NBM FC was not associated with cognitive outcome in those patients with MCI
who did not take ChEI in the 6-month interval, making a confounding predictive
effect of cognitive decline from disease progression less likely. The predictive
potential is large as the overall effect was strong, with several clusters
explaining up to 48% of the variance in cognitive outcome. Interestingly, we also
observed a pattern of negative correlation between baseline NBM FC, mainly located
in the anterior cingulate cortex, and cognitive change 6 months after taking ChEI.
The direction of this association may be explained by the known high degree of
regional heterogeneity of cholinergic receptors and possible disease stage effects
(36).Clinical translational potential of NBM FC is particularly high because task-free
resting-state functional MRI can be easily incorporated into the current routine
diagnostic work-up of patients with memory complaints. If the prediction of
treatment response can be confirmed in prospective studies, then NBM FC could
broaden the clinical remit of MRI for work-up of memory impairment beyond the
current diagnostic support to assist treatment stratification.Our study was limited by the design of the ADNI study. All the participants with AD
had already started to take ChEI when they were recruited. Thus, we could not
investigate the effects of ChEI on NBM FC in patients with AD. Because of the
observational nature of the ADNI study, our findings on ChEI effects on NBM FC and
the prediction of cognitive outcomes by NBM FC could not be placebo controlled.
However, serial data were available in matched patients with untreated MCI, allowing
us to make a serial effect from disease progression unlikely. Because of the small
cohort of patients undergoing ChEI, for the comparison of NBM FC before and after 6
months of ChEI treatment, we chose a less rigorous multiple test correction at the
voxel level alone. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm the reported
treatment changes of NBM FC and the predictive value of NBM FC at baseline. Another
potential limitation was the robustness of the seed-based analysis because of the
small size and ill-defined borders of the NBM at functional MRI, making manual
delineation challenging. We addressed this by showing the robustness of the manual
drawing method against small shifts of the seeds by using an in-house Matlab
(version R2016a; Mathworks, Natick, Mass) code. This step could be improved by
semiautomatic seed selection.In summary, our study shows that NBM FC metrics obtained from a brief task-free
functional MRI at 3.0 T has promising prognostic and predictive biomarker properties
for central cholinergic dysfunction. If confirmed in prospective studies, then NBM
FC could assist treatment stratification and facilitate ongoing drug development for
optimized restoration of cholinergic functions in people living with or at risk for
dementia.
Summary
Nucleus basalis of Meynert functional connectivity metrics obtained from
resting-state functional MRI have promising prognostic and predictive
biomarker properties for central cholinergic dysfunction.■ The findings suggest that nucleus basalis of Meynert
functional connectivity metrics obtained from resting-state
functional MRI have promising biomarker properties for measuring
central cholinergic dysfunction and predicting treatment response to
cholinesterase inhibition.■ If confirmed in future studies, then nucleus basalis of
Meynert functional connectivity may assist treatment stratification
and facilitate ongoing drug development for optimized restoration of
cholinergic functions in people living with or at risk for
dementia.
Authors: Nils Richter; Inka Allendorf; Oezguer A Onur; Lutz Kracht; Markus Dietlein; Marc Tittgemeyer; Bernd Neumaier; Gereon R Fink; Juraj Kukolja Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel M Bittner; Isabel Wieseler; Helmut Wilhelm; Matthias W Riepe; Notger G Müller Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Shannon L Risacher; Brenna C McDonald; Eileen F Tallman; John D West; Martin R Farlow; Fredrick W Unverzagt; Sujuan Gao; Malaz Boustani; Paul K Crane; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; William J Jagust; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Andrew J Saykin Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Krista L Lanctôt; Nathan Herrmann; Kenneth K Yau; Lyla R Khan; Barbara A Liu; Maysoon M LouLou; Thomas R Einarson Journal: CMAJ Date: 2003-09-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Deepak K Sarpal; Annie Blazer; James D Wilson; Finnegan J Calabro; William Foran; Charles E Kahn; Beatriz Luna; K N Roy Chengappa Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 4.662