Literature DB >> 30203678

Cross-sectional evaluation of the impact of information on flexible extended regimens of oral contraceptives in the choices made by women seeking contraceptive counselling: the FLEXO study.

Iñaki Lete1, Jackie Calleja2, Ezequiel Pérez-Campos3, Esther de la Viuda4, Roberto Lertxundi5, Mercedes Martínez6, Macarena Quesada7, Rafael Sánchez-Borrego8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Oral combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) are available that limit the number of menses when used in a flexible extended regimen. Our aim was to investigate the decision-making processes of women presented with a flexible extended CHC option.
METHODS: The FLEXO study is an epidemiological, cross-sectional, multicentre study conducted under typical clinical practice conditions to determine women's acceptance of a flexible continuous CHC regimen versus a cyclical 21/7 day regimen, after receiving standardised information during contraceptive counselling.
RESULTS: A total of 1350 women were invited to participate, of whom 1156 were enrolled. Of these, 47.2% chose the flexible extended CHC regimen. Their main reason for choosing this regimen was to reduce the number of menses (25.7%), followed by the desire to avoid symptoms related to menstruation (21.6%). The reasons given for rejecting this regimen were the desire to have monthly menstrual cycles (24.9%) and the fear of becoming pregnant and not being aware of it due to the absence of menstruation (18.1%).
CONCLUSION: Many women chose the extended flexible regimen when they received information about this option. Women primarily chose this pattern to relieve or eliminate discomfort related to menstruation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice; combined oral hormonal contraception; contraceptive guidance; flexible extended regimen; menstruation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203678     DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1493099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  1 in total

1.  The myth of menstruation: how menstrual regulation and suppression impact contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Andrea L DeMaria; Beth Sundstrom; Stephanie Meier; Abigail Wiseley
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.809

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.