Literature DB >> 30203530

Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after refractive surgery by noncontact tonometry: small-incision lenticule extraction versus flap-based refractive surgery - a systematic review.

Pernille Raevdal1,2, Jakob Grauslund1,2, Anders Højslet Vestergaard1,2.   

Abstract

Corneal refractive surgery disrupts corneal integrity and reduces biomechanical stability in consequence of the beneficial refractive alteration. The minimal invasive cap-based refractive procedure, small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), has been proposed to affect corneal integrity less than flap-based procedures, due to the fibre-sparing incision of the strong anterior corneal lamellae. Flap-based procedures include laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate corneal biomechanical changes by noncontact air pulse tonometry after treatment of myopia/myopic astigmatism with SMILE compared to flap-based refractive surgery. A total of 220 publications were identified through a systematic search in PubMed and Embase. Two levels of screening identified nine studies (three randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six nonrandomised clinical trials) eligible for the review. All the nonrandomised clinical trials were graded to have an overall serious risk of bias. Measurements with the Corvis ST were not included in any of the eligible studies. The RCTs found no statistical significant differences between SMILE or flap-based procedures concerning corneal hysteresis (CH) or corneal resistance factor (CRF), as measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. However, a greater reduction in CRF and CH was found in the flap-based group in five and two of the nonrandomised studies, respectively. The findings in this review illustrate that the presumed biomechanical advantages of a cap-based small incision could not be demonstrated in existing studies and by commercially available technology. However, studies with lower levels of evidence suggest less affection of corneal viscoelastic properties after SMILE when evaluating corneal stability by noncontact tonometry.
© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air pulse tonometry, myopia; corneal biomechanics; femtosecond laser; femtosecond lenticule extraction; laser in situ keratomileusis; small-incision lenticule extraction; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203530     DOI: 10.1111/aos.13906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  3 in total

1.  Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Lei Tian; Haixia Zhang; Yan Zheng; Caiyun Fu; Changbin Zhai; Ying Jie; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea.

Authors:  Yue Xin; Bernardo T Lopes; JunJie Wang; Jie Wu; ManMan Zhu; MuChen Jiang; YuanYuan Miao; HuiNi Lin; Si Cao; XiaoBo Zheng; Ashkan Eliasy; ShiHao Chen; QinMei Wang; YuFeng Ye; FangJun Bao; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 3.  Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.