Literature DB >> 30203525

The effects of outcome unit framing on delay discounting.

William B DeHart1, Jonathan E Friedel1, Charles C J Frye1, Ann Galizio1, Amy L Odum1.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of outcome framing on delay discounting. In Experiment 1, participants completed four delay-discounting tasks. In one monetary task, money was framed in units of dollars ($50), and in the other, money was framed in units of handfuls of quarters (equal to $50). In one food task, food was framed in clear units of food (e.g., 100 M&Ms), and in the other, food was framed in units of servings (e.g., 10 servings of M&Ms). When money was framed in units of dollars, participants discounted less by delay compared to discounting of handfuls of quarters. When food was framed as clear units, participants also discounted less compared to how they discounted servings. In Experiment 2, participants completed two delay-discounting tasks for dollars and quarters (e.g., $50 or 200 quarters) to determine if the results of Experiment 1 were due to the differences in handling costs. In one delay-discounting task, money was framed in units of dollars. In the other delay-discounting task, money was framed in units of quarters. There was no difference in how participants discounted delayed money framed as dollars or quarters. Clear unit framing may result in less discounting by delay than fuzzy unit framing.
© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  context; delay discounting; framing; human; impulsivity; temporal discounting

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203525     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  2 in total

1.  The drug purity discounting task: Ecstasy use likelihood is reduced by probabilistic impurity according to harmfulness of adulterants.

Authors:  Sean B Dolan; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan J Becker; Jeremy M Haynes; Ann Galizio; Charles C J Frye; Haylee Downey; Jonathan E Friedel; D M Perez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.215

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.