| Literature DB >> 30203391 |
Masayoshi Yamamoto1, Yoshihiro Seo2, Tomoko Ishizu1, Isao Nishi3, Yoshie Hamada-Harimura4, Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka1, Haruhiko Higuchi5, Seika Sai4, Tomofumi Nakatsukasa1, Akinori Sugano1, Masako Baba6, Kenichi Obara7, Kazutaka Aonuma1.
Abstract
Differences in the clinical impacts of the aldosterone receptor antagonists spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with heart failure (HF) are unclear. Among 838 prospectively enrolled patients hospitalized for HF, 90 treated with eplerenone were compared with 90 treated with spironolactone. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization. A serial evaluation of the clinical parameters was performed 1 year after discharge. The mean dose of spironolactone was 27 ± 8 mg and of eplerenone was 34 ± 15 mg. During follow-up (mean 594 ± 317 days), primary endpoints occurred in 27 patients in the eplerenone group (30.0%) and 25 patients in the spironolactone group (27.8%). There were no significant intergroup differences in the primary endpoint (log-rank, p = 0.956). Serial changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, serum brain natriuretic peptide, systolic blood pressure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between groups. Although gynecomastia in men was common in the spironolactone group (p = 0.018), the discontinuation rates due to adverse events were similar in the two groups (p = 0.135). Subgroup analyses suggested that eplerenone was associated with a lower hazard rate of the primary endpoint in female patients (interaction, p = 0.076). Among patients with HF, eplerenone and spironolactone have similar impacts on cardiovascular outcomes and safety.Entities:
Keywords: Aldosterone receptor antagonist; Eplerenone; Heart failure; Spironolactone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30203391 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-018-1250-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037