Literature DB >> 30202950

Leadless pacing using the transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS) in the real world: initial Swiss experience from the Romandie region.

Valérian Valiton1,2, Denis Graf2,3, Etienne Pruvot3, Patrice Carroz3,4, Martin Fromer3, Laurence Bisch3, Vân Nam Tran3, Stéphane Cook2, Christoph Scharf5, Haran Burri1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Leadless pacemakers are implanted in Switzerland since June 2015. Large worldwide registries have shown high implant success, low complication rates, and good electrical parameters up to 12 months' follow-up. However, data are scarce outside the investigational setting. The purpose of this study is to assess the real-world experience regarding clinical safety and efficacy of Micra TPS (transcatheter pacing system) leadless pacemakers. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Retrospective observational, multi-centre study designed to assess initial safety and efficacy of the Micra TPS in the Swiss Romande region. A total of 92 patients were included from four different centres with an implantation success rate of 97.8% (90 of 92). Thresholds were overall low at implantation (median 0.38 V/0.24 ms, ranging from 0.13 to 2.88 V/0.24 ms) and remained stable over 1-year follow-up. The perioperative serious adverse event rate was 6.5% in six patients which lead to prolonged hospitalization in five patients and death in one patient. In addition, three further major events (3.3%) occurred during an average follow-up of 1 year, requiring implantation of a standard transvenous pacemaker in two patients, and surgical explantation of the Micra TPS in one patient due to intractable ventricular tachycardia.
CONCLUSION: Leadless pacemakers are a valuable adjunct for treating selected patients requiring single-chamber pacing. However, in this initial experience, major complication rates were high (9.8%). The implant procedure requires proper training and should be performed in an adequate setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30202950     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Darlington; Philip Brown; Vanessa Carvalho; Hayley Bourne; Joseph Mayer; Nathan Jones; Vincent Walker; Shoaib Siddiqui; Ashish Patwala; Chun Shing Kwok
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  Reducing CIED-Related Morbidity: "LESS Is More".

Authors:  François D Regoli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Outcomes using a single tapered dilator for Micra leadless pacemaker implant.

Authors:  Moghniuddin Mohammed; Juwairiya Arshi; Brian M Ramza; Alan P Wimmer; Daniel A Steinhaus; Michael J Giocondo; Sanjaya K Gupta; Omair K Yousuf
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2020-03-04

4.  Leadless pacemaker perforations: Clinical consequences and related device and user problems.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; Charles C Gornick; Raed H Abdelhadi; Chuen Y Tang; Melanie Kapphahn-Bergs; Susan A Casey; Brynn K Okeson; Elizabeth A Steele; Jay D Sengupta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.942

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.