Amelia Merced1, Karen S Renzaglia2. 1. Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, Puerto Rico. 2. Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In seed plants, stomata regulate CO2 acquisition and water relations via transpiration, while minimizing water loss. Walls of guard cells are strong yet flexible because they open and close the pore by changing shape over the substomatal cavity. Pectins are necessary for wall flexibility and proper stomata functioning. This study investigates the differences in pectin composition in guard cells of two taxa that represent key lineages of plants with stomata: Arabidopsis, an angiosperm with diurnal stomatal activity, and Phaeoceros, a bryophyte that lacks active stomatal movement. METHODS: Using immunolocalization techniques in transmission electron microscopy, this study describes and compares the localization of pectin molecule epitopes essential to stomata function in guard cell walls of Arabidopsis and Phaeoceros. KEY RESULTS: In Arabidopsis, unesterified homogalacturonans very strongly localize throughout guard cell walls and are interspersed with arabinan pectins, while methyl-esterified homogalacturonans are restricted to the exterior of the wall, the ledges and the junction with adjacent epidermal cells. In contrast, arabinans are absent in Phaeoceros, and both unesterified and methyl-esterified homogalacturonans localize throughout guard cell walls. CONCLUSIONS: Arabinans and unesterified homogalacturonans are required for wall flexibility, which is consistent with active regulation of pore opening in Arabidopsis stomata. In contrast, the lack of arabinans and high levels of methyl-esterified homogalacturonans in guard cell walls of Phaeoceros are congruent with the inability of hornwort stomata to open and close with environmental change. Comparisons across groups demonstrate that variations in guard cell wall composition reflect different physiological activity of stomata in land plants.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In seed plants, stomata regulate CO2 acquisition and water relations via transpiration, while minimizing water loss. Walls of guard cells are strong yet flexible because they open and close the pore by changing shape over the substomatal cavity. Pectins are necessary for wall flexibility and proper stomata functioning. This study investigates the differences in pectin composition in guard cells of two taxa that represent key lineages of plants with stomata: Arabidopsis, an angiosperm with diurnal stomatal activity, and Phaeoceros, a bryophyte that lacks active stomatal movement. METHODS: Using immunolocalization techniques in transmission electron microscopy, this study describes and compares the localization of pectin molecule epitopes essential to stomata function in guard cell walls of Arabidopsis and Phaeoceros. KEY RESULTS: In Arabidopsis, unesterified homogalacturonans very strongly localize throughout guard cell walls and are interspersed with arabinan pectins, while methyl-esterified homogalacturonans are restricted to the exterior of the wall, the ledges and the junction with adjacent epidermal cells. In contrast, arabinans are absent in Phaeoceros, and both unesterified and methyl-esterified homogalacturonans localize throughout guard cell walls. CONCLUSIONS: Arabinans and unesterified homogalacturonans are required for wall flexibility, which is consistent with active regulation of pore opening in Arabidopsis stomata. In contrast, the lack of arabinans and high levels of methyl-esterified homogalacturonans in guard cell walls of Phaeoceros are congruent with the inability of hornwort stomata to open and close with environmental change. Comparisons across groups demonstrate that variations in guard cell wall composition reflect different physiological activity of stomata in land plants.
Authors: Karen S Renzaglia; Juan Carlos Villarreal; Bryan T Piatkowski; Jessica R Lucas; Amelia Merced Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Yves Verhertbruggen; Susan E Marcus; Ash Haeger; René Verhoef; Henk A Schols; Barry V McCleary; Lauren McKee; Harry J Gilbert; J Paul Knox Journal: Plant J Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Sam Amsbury; Lee Hunt; Nagat Elhaddad; Alice Baillie; Marjorie Lundgren; Yves Verhertbruggen; Henrik V Scheller; J Paul Knox; Andrew J Fleming; Julie E Gray Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Athanas Guzha; Robert McGee; Patricia Scholz; Denise Hartken; Daniel Lüdke; Kornelia Bauer; Marion Wenig; Krzysztof Zienkiewicz; Cornelia Herrfurth; Ivo Feussner; A Corina Vlot; Marcel Wiermer; George Haughn; Till Ischebeck Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 8.005
Authors: Eftychios Frangedakis; Masaki Shimamura; Juan Carlos Villarreal; Fay-Wei Li; Marta Tomaselli; Manuel Waller; Keiko Sakakibara; Karen S Renzaglia; Péter Szövényi Journal: New Phytol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 10.151