| Literature DB >> 30202639 |
Maria C Cozzi1, Maria G Strillacci1, Paolo Valiati1, Elisa Rogliano1, Alessandro Bagnato1, Maria Longeri1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Akhal-Teke horse (AKH) is native of the modern Turkmenistan area. It was introduced in Italy from 1991 to 2000 mainly as an endurance horse. This paper characterizes the genetic variability of the whole Italian AKH horse population and evaluates their inbreeding level by analyzing microsatellite markers and mitochondrial D-Loop sequences.Entities:
Keywords: Akhal-Teke; Biodiversity; Genetic variability; Horse; Median joining network; Microsatellite markers; Neighbor-joining tree; PCA; Sequencing; mtDNA D-loop
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202639 PMCID: PMC6129384 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Measures of genetic variation in AKH bred in Italy by 16 microsatellites.
| Locus | NA | NE | AR | H | H | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHT4 | 6 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 0.019 ± 0.01 | 0.653 | 0.617 | −0.058 |
| HMS7 | 6 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 0.676 ± 0.01 | 0.589 | 0.623 | 0.055 |
| HTG4 | 6 | 1.7 | 5.8 | 0.026 ± 0.01 | 0.379 | 0.410 | 0.075 |
| VHL20 | 9 | 3.8 | 8.8 | 0.442 ± 0.02 | 0.758 | 0.740 | −0.024 |
| AHT5 | 5 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 0.093 ± 0.01 | 0.755 | 0.740 | −0.021 |
| ASB2 | 10 | 5.3 | 9.8 | 0.511 ± 0.02 | 0.810 | 0.816 | 0.007 |
| HMS6 | 6 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 0.139 ± 0.01 | 0.558 | 0.643 | 0.133 |
| HTG6 | 4 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 0.071 ± 0.01 | 0.453 | 0.548 | 0.174 |
| HMS2 | 8 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 0.429 ± 0.02 | 0.716 | 0.728 | 0.017 |
| HMS3 | 7 | 2.9 | 6.9 | 0.154 ± 0.01 | 0.653 | 0.665 | 0.019 |
| HTG10 | 7 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 0.346 ± 0.01 | 0.800 | 0.720 | −0.113 |
| HTG7 | 4 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.685 ± 0.01 | 0.505 | 0.493 | −0.026 |
| ASB17 | 9 | 5.2 | 8.9 | 0.280 ± 0.02 | 0.625 | 0.813 | −0.061 |
| ASB23 | 6 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 0.167 ± 0.01 | 0.600 | 0.702 | 0.147 |
| CA425 | 6 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 0.015 ± 0.01 | 0.532 | 0.522 | −0.018 |
| HMS1 | 4 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 0.226 ± 0.01 | 0.642 | 0.609 | −0.055 |
| Mean ± SD | 6.4 ± 1.8 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 6.4 | 0.050 ± 0.01 | 0.642 ± 0.1 | 0.649 ± 0.1 | 0.016 |
Notes.
number of alleles
effective number of alleles
allelic richness
Hardy-Weinberg
P values
observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity values and inbreeding coefficient values
standard error
standard deviation
Polymorphic sites in the horse Italian AKH mtDNA D-loop sequence nucleotide ranging from 15385 to 15862 positions, according to the reference sequences X79547 and JN398377.
| Haplotypes | Position of nucleotide substitutions | Freq.% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15494 | 15495 | 15496 | 15521 | 15534 | 15538 | 15542 | 15585 | 15597 | 15602 | 15603 | 15604 | 15617 | 15635 | 15649 | 15650 | 15659 | 15666 | 15703 | 15709 | 15720 | 15737 | |||
|
| T | T | A | G | C | A | C | G | A | C | T | G | T | C | A | A | T | G | T | C | G | T | Reference | |
|
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | sequences | |
| H1 | . | C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 4.5 |
| H2 | . | C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | T | . | . | C | . | . | . | C | . | . | . | A | . | 3 | 13.6 |
| H3 | . | C | . | A | . | . | . | . | . | T | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | A | C | 3 | 13.6 |
| H4 | . | C | . | . | . | . | T | A | G | T | . | . | . | T | . | G | . | A | C | . | A | . | 4 | 18.2 |
| H5 | . | C | . | . | . | . | T | A | G | T | . | . | . | . | . | G | . | A | . | . | A | . | 2 | 9.1 |
| H6 | . | C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | T | . | . | . | . | . | G | . | . | . | . | A | . | 1 | 4.5 |
| H7 | . | C | . | . | . | . | . | A | . | T | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | A | . | 2 | 9.1 |
| H8 | . | C | . | . | . | G | . | A | . | T | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | T | A | . | 1 | 4.5 |
| H9 | C | C | G | . | T | . | . | . | . | . | C | . | . | . | G | . | . | . | . | . | A | . | 1 | 4.5 |
| H10 | C | C | G | . | T | . | . | A | . | T | C | A | . | . | G | . | . | . | . | . | A | . | 3 | 13.6 |
| H11 | C | C | G | A | T | . | . | A | . | T | C | A | . | . | G | . | . | . | . | . | A | . | 1 | 4.5 |
Notes.
number of samples per haplotype
haplotypes frequency in percentage
ID Reference sequences
Figure 1Inter-haplotypic pairwise distance matrix based on haplotypes pairwise genetic differentiation, with the legend of the color code.
Hap_R = reference sequences X79547 and JN398377.
Figure 2Clustering of haplogroups by MJN (A), NJ tree (B), PCA (C).
(A) The haplotypes MJN based on the 124 horse mtDNA sequences and the two reference sequences (X79547 and JN398377). The numbers in red represent the position of nucleotide substitution; the black circle are the median vectors; circle are proportional to the numerosity of the haplotypes. AKH, Akhal-Teke; ARH, Arabian horse; BRH, Barb horse; CAP, Caspian Pony; PRZ, Przewalskii; H1, references. (B) The haplotypes NJ tree based on Kimura-2-parameter model distances. The numbers represent the robustness of the dendrogram after the cutoff bootstrap procedure was applied, with the legend of the haplogroup definition. (C) PCA analyses based on 51 haplotypes showing a minimum spanning tree. The graphic reports the percentage of variance explained by PCA components.
Comparison with results reported by Szontagh et al. (2005)a and by Jiskrová, Vrtková & Prausová (2016)b using the same panel of 12 and 13 microsatellites.
| Breed | NSTS | NS | NA | MNA | NE | H | H | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akhal-Teke Turkmeniana | 12 | 48 | 73 | 6.1 | 4.03 | 0.664 | 0.703 | 0.053 |
| Akhal-Teke USAa | 12 | 58 | 91 | 7.6 | 4.03 | 0.655 | 0.727 | 0.100 |
| Akhal-Teke Irana | 12 | 19 | 70 | 5.8 | 4.20 | 0.728 | 0.725 | −0.005 |
| 13 | ||||||||
| Akhal-Teke Czech Republicb | 13 | 121 | 114 | 8.8 | 4.12 | 0.648 | 0.731 | 0.114 |
| Akhal-Teke Russiab | 13 | 152 | 74 | 5.7 | 3.43 | 0.669 | 0.668 | −0.005 |
| Akhal-Teke Estoniab | 13 | 28 | 62 | 4.8 | 3.16 | 0.720 | 0.665 | −0.103 |
| Akhal-Teke Switzerlandb | 13 | 24 | 63 | 4.8 | 3.04 | 0.664 | 0.656 | −0.029 |
Notes.
number of microsatellites
number of samples
absolute number of alleles
Mean number of alleles
effective number of alleles
observed heterozygosity
expected heterozygosity
inbreeding coefficient