| Literature DB >> 30202463 |
James T Fletcher1, Matthew D Hanson1, Joseph A Christensen1, Eric M Villa1.
Abstract
The 1-substituted-4-imino-1,2,3-triazole motif is an established component of coordination compounds and bioactive molecules, but depending on the substituent identity, it can be inherently unstable due to Dimroth rearrangements. This study examined parameters governing the ring-degenerate rearrangement reactions of 1-substituted-4-imino-1,2,3-triazoles, expanding on trends first observed by L'abbé et al. The efficiency of condensation between 4-formyltriazole and amine reactants as well as the propensity of imine products towards rearrangement was each strongly influenced by the substituent identity. It was observed that unsymmetrical condensation reactions conducted at 70 °C produced up to four imine products via a dynamic equilibrium of condensation, rearrangement and hydrolysis steps. Kinetic studies utilizing 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carbaldehyde with varying amines showed rearrangement rates sensitive to both steric and electronic factors. Such measurements were facilitated by a high throughput colorimetric assay to directly monitor the generation of a 4-nitroaniline byproduct.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,3-triazole; colorimetric assay; condensation; imine exchange; rearrangement
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202463 PMCID: PMC6122373 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Figure 1Conversion of 1-substituted-4-formyltriazole analogs via ring-degenerate rearrangement of 1-substituted-4-imino-1,2,3-triazoles as first described by L’abbé [42].
Evaluation of symmetrical condensation parameters.
| entry | R | R’ | solvent | conditions | compound | rel %a | compound | rel %a |
| 1 | NO2 | NO2 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 100% | 0% | ||
| 2 | NO2 | NO2 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 48 h | 100% | 0% | ||
| 3 | NO2 | NO2 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 72 h | 100% | 0% | ||
| 4 | CF3 | CF3 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 41% | 59% | ||
| 5 | CF3 | CF3 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 48 h | 17% | 83% | ||
| 6 | CF3 | CF3 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 72 h | 10% | 90% | ||
| 7 | H | H | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 0% | 100% | ||
| 8 | CH3 | CH3 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 0% | 100% | ||
| 9 | OCH3 | OCH3 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 0% | 100% | ||
| 10 | N(Et)2 | N(Et)2 | MeOH/CHCl3 | rt, 24 h | 0% | 100% | ||
| 11 | NO2 | NO2 | 70 °C, 24 h | 100% | 0% | |||
| 12 | CF3 | CF3 | 70 °C, 24 h | 47% | 53% | |||
| 13 | H | H | 70 °C, 24 h | 11% | 89% | |||
| 14 | CH3 | CH3 | 70 °C, 24 h | 7% | 93% | |||
| 15 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 70 °C, 24 h | 2% | 98% | |||
| 16 | N(Et)2 | N(Et)2 | 70 °C, 24 h | 6% | 94% | |||
aRelative molar fraction of 1 and 2 derivatives as determined by NMR integration.
Figure 2ORTEP structure of 2cc’. Thermal ellipsoids shown at 25% probability.
Evaluation of unsymmetrical condensation parameters.
| entry | R | R’ | compd | rel %a | compd | rel %a | compd | rel %a | compd | rel %a | compd | rel %a | compd | rel %a |
| 1b | H | NO2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 2b | H | CF3 | 15% | 85% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 3b | H | CH3 | 3% | 97% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 4b | H | OCH3 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 5b | H | N(Et)2 | 8% | 92% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 6b | NO2 | H | 13% | 78% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 0% | ||||||
| 7b | NO2 | H 48 h | 18% | 57% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | ||||||
| 8b | NO2 | H 72 h | 5% | 17% | 0% | 14% | 64% | 0% | ||||||
| 9b | CF3 | H | 41% | 59% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 10b | CF3 | H 48 h | 17% | 83% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 11b | CF3 | H 72 h | 10% | 90% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 12b | CH3 | H | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 13b | OCH3 | H | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 14b | N(Et)2 | H | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 15c | H | NO2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| 16c | H | CF3 | 52% | 29% | 0% | 5% | 6% | 8% | ||||||
| 17c | H | CH3 | 0% | 31% | 22% | 0% | 28% | 19% | ||||||
| 18c | H | OCH3 | 2% | 24% | 23% | 2% | 31% | 18% | ||||||
| 19c | H | N(Et)2 | 8% | 14% | 28% | 13% | 15% | 22% | ||||||
| 20c | NO2 | H | 0% | 0% | 0% | 62% | 38% | 0% | ||||||
| 21c | CF3 | H | 0% | 3% | 18% | 62% | 14% | 3% | ||||||
| 22c | CH3 | H | 0% | 60% | 16% | 0% | 11% | 13% | ||||||
| 23c | OCH3 | H | 0% | 56% | 8% | 0% | 18% | 18% | ||||||
| 24c | N(Et)2 | H | 0% | 87% | 0% | 1% | 12% | 0% | ||||||
aRelative molar fraction of 1 and 2 derivatives as determined by NMR integration; b1:1 MeOH/CHCl3 solvent, room temperature, 24 h unless otherwise noted; c1:1 t-BuOH/H2O solvent, 70 °C, 24 h unless otherwise noted.
Figure 31H NMR aromatic region of a product mixture compared with reference imine analogs. Singlets appearing from 8.5–8.7 ppm correspond to the triazole C–H position used to quantify the imine constituents of product mixtures.
Figure 4Rearrangement reaction progress of 1a leading to irreversible formation of a colorimetric self-indicating byproduct.
Kinetic assay results.a
| entry | amine reactant | initial rate (μM/min) |
| 1 | 2,6-dimethylaniline | 20 |
| 2 | 54 | |
| 3 | 83 | |
| 4 | 3,5-dimethylaniline | 110 |
| 5 | 4-aminobenzotrifluoride | 11 |
| 6 | 4-fluoroaniline | 60 |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2-naphthylamine | 46 |
| 9 | 2-aminofluorene | 91 |
| 10 | 2-aminoanthracene | 130 |
| 11 | 3-aminopentane | 30 |
| 12 | 91 | |
| 13 | benzylamine | 120 |
aSee experimental section in Supporting Information File 1.