| Literature DB >> 30202428 |
Masatoku Arai1, Shiei Kim1, Hiromoto Ishii1, Jun Hagiwara1, Shigeki Kushimoto2, Hiroyuki Yokota1.
Abstract
Background: In a previous study, we reported the usefulness of early abdominal wall reconstruction using bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method (turnover flap method) in open abdomen (OA) patients in whom early primary fascial closure was difficult to achieve. However, the long-term outcomes have not been elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the procedure, particularly in terms of ventral hernia, pain, and daily activities.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal compartment syndrome; Abdominal wall reconstruction; Negative pressure wound therapy; Open abdomen
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202428 PMCID: PMC6123919 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0200-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Emerg Surg ISSN: 1749-7922 Impact factor: 5.469
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the technique for bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method. a First, the skin and subcutaneous tissue are separated from the anterior rectus sheath as a flap bilaterally beyond the lateral border of the rectus abdominis sheath. A longitudinal incision is then made in each anterior rectus sheath ≥ 1 cm inside the lateral border. After confirming the presence of the rectus abdominis muscle, the incision is extended the entire length of the anterior rectus sheath. The anterior rectus sheath is then dissected from the lateral to medial face, freeing it from the rectus abdominis muscles. b It is reflected medially and approximated with interrupted absorbable sutures to cover the abdominal contents. The skin is closed primarily or secondarily
Characteristics in patients undergoing turnover flap method
| Patients | 15 | |
| Age (median, range) | 70 | 8–90 |
| Sex ratio (male) | 11 | 73.3% |
| Diagnosis | ||
| Non-trauma | 13 | 86.7% |
| RAAA | 8 | 53.3% |
| Diffuse peritonitis | 3 | 20.0% |
| Severe acute pancreatitis | 1 | 6.7% |
| Hemorrhagic gastric ulcer | 1 | 6.7% |
| Trauma | 2 | 13.3% |
| Hepatic injury, SMV injury, and pelvic fracture | 1 | 6.7% |
| Diaphragmatic and duodenal injury and pelvic fracture | 1 | 6.7% |
| Indication of OA | ||
| Prevention of ACS | 12 | 80.0% |
| ACS | 1 | 6.7% |
| Damage control surgery | 2 | 13.3% |
| Duration of OA (day: median, range) | 6 | 1–42 |
ACS abdominal compartment syndrome, OA open abdomen, RAAA ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, SMV superior mesenteric vein
Characteristics in the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing turnover flap method
| Case | Gender | Diagnosis | Reason for OA | TAC | Duration of OA (days) | Complications | Length of hospital stay (days) | Follow-up period (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-trauma | ||||||||
| 1 | Male | Ruptured AAA | Prevention of ACS | Silo | 6 | Ventral hernia | 74 | 12 |
| 2 | Male | Severe acute pancreatitis | ACS (IAP 30 mmHg) | Silo, NPWT | 31 | None | 120 | 13 |
| 3 | Male | Ruptured AAA | Prevention of ACS | NPWT | 8 | None | 36 | 10 |
| 4 | Female | Ruptured AAA | Prevention of ACS | NPWT | 3 | None | 60 | 6 |
| 5 | Male | Ruptured AAA | Prevention of ACS | Mesh traction + NPWT | 8 | None | 60 | 3 |
| 6 | Male | Diffuse peritonitis | Abdominal sepsis | Mesh traction + NPWT | 42 | None | 56 | 4 |
| 7 | Female | Diffuse peritonitis | Abdominal sepsis | Mesh traction + NPWT | 31 | None | 68 | 3 |
| Trauma | ||||||||
| 1 | Male | Hepatic and SMV injury, pelvic fracture | Damage control | Silo | 6 | None | 101 | 15 |
| 2 | Female | Diaphragmatic and duodenal injury, pelvic fracture | Damage control | Silo, NPWT | 30 | None | 105 | 12 |
ACS abdominal compartment syndrome, OA open abdomen, AAA abdominal aortic aneurysm, SMV superior mesenteric vein
Fig. 2The CT findings and views of the abdominal wall. The upper panels show images obtained 6 years after performing the turnover flap method (a, b, c). The lower panels show images obtained 10 years after turnover flap method (d, e, f). The CT scans show that the appearance of flaps created using bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath looks similar to after onlay mesh repair (a, d). Anteroposterior views (b, e) and lateral views (c, f) of the abdominal wall in the standing position. Although slight lower abdominal bulging can be observed in the lateral views of both patients, no abdominal hernia is evident
Selected questions from VHPQ
| Pain right now—not easily ignored | 0/9 |
| Pain last week—not easily ignored | 0/9 |
| Abdominal stiffness/rigidity | 0/9 |
| Satisfaction of the operation | 7/9 |
VHPQ ventral hernia pain questionnaire