Literature DB >> 30202304

College Students' Mobile Telephone Use Is Positively Associated With Sedentary Behavior.

Jacob E Barkley1, Andrew Lepp1, Saba Salehi-Esfahani1.   

Abstract

While mobile phones (henceforth cell phones) provide nearly constant access to activities (eg, watching videos, playing games) traditionally associated with sedentary behavior, the relationship between cell phone use, sedentary behavior, and physical activity is untested. The purpose of this study was to assess these relationships. A sample of college students (N = 236) completed surveys assessing daily cell phone use, sedentary behavior (sitting time) and physical activity. Regression demonstrated that cell use was positively associated (β = 0.23, P = .05) with sedentary behavior and not related (β = -0.02, P = .90) to physical activity. Tertile splits were performed for average daily cell phone use and participants were grouped as high (n = 81), moderate (n = 77) or low (n = 78) cell users. High users (495.1 ± 227.6 min/d) participated in significantly (P ≤ .03) more sedentary behavior than the moderate (417.1 ± 208.3 min/day) and low (395.2 ± 180.0 min/d) users. Sedentary behavior was not different (P = .5) between the moderate and low users. In conclusion, cell use was associated with college students' sedentary behavior but not physical activity. High users allocated 18.7% and 25.3% more time to daily sitting than moderate and low users, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active couch potato; cell phone; health; sitting; smartphone

Year:  2016        PMID: 30202304      PMCID: PMC6124985          DOI: 10.1177/1559827615594338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med        ISSN: 1559-8276


  23 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Klaas R Westerterp
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; M A Pereira; K M Curran
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.

Authors:  G Godin; R J Shephard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-09

4.  Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults.

Authors:  Hidde P van der Ploeg; Tien Chey; Rosemary J Korda; Emily Banks; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-26

5.  A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations.

Authors:  Amanda L Rebar; Robert Stanton; David Geard; Camille Short; Mitch J Duncan; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07-03

6.  Factors associated with cell phone use in adolescents in the community of Madrid (Spain).

Authors:  Mercedes Sánchez-Martínez; Angel Otero
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2009-04

7.  Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults.

Authors:  Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students.

Authors:  Andrew Lepp; Jacob E Barkley; Gabriel J Sanders; Michael Rebold; Peter Gates
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 9.  Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis.

Authors:  Anouk Middelweerd; Julia S Mollee; C Natalie van der Wal; Johannes Brug; Saskia J Te Velde
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason Fanning; Sean P Mullen; Edward McAuley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  7 in total

1.  Associations of Objectively-Assessed Smartphone Use with Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Mood, and Sleep Quality in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana; José María Fernández-Batanero; Curtis Fennell; Borja Sañudo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Comparison of College Students' Energy Expenditure, Physical Activity, and Enjoyment during Exergaming and Traditional Exercise.

Authors:  Daniel J McDonough; Zachary C Pope; Nan Zeng; Jung Eun Lee; Zan Gao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Cell phone use predicts being an "active couch potato": results from a cross-sectional survey of sufficiently active college students.

Authors:  Andrew Lepp; Jacob E Barkley
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-04-12

4.  Mini Review of the Use of the Mobile Phone and Its Repercussion in the Deficit of Physical Activity.

Authors:  María Luisa Zagalaz-Sánchez; Javier Cachón-Zagalaz; María Sánchez-Zafra; Amador Lara-Sánchez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-06-06

5.  Analysis of the effect of overusing thumbs on smartphone games.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Liang Tang; Huihui Wu; Dongyun Gu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Examining the Relationship between Cellphone Use Behavior, Perceived Exercise Benefit and Physical Exercise Level Among University Students in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Lin; Wen-Yi Wang; Chun-Chin Liao; Yu-Jy Luo; Chun-Chieh Kao
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 7.  Children's Independent Mobility: Current Knowledge, Future Directions, and Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Isabel Marzi; Anne Kerstin Reimers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.