| Literature DB >> 30202246 |
Soraj Pruettikomon1, Chaturong Louhapensang1.
Abstract
This research aims to improve the work effectiveness of people with physical disabilities in department stores, retail and wholesale companies in Bangkok. It focuses on the environment and facilities needed by people with three types of disabilities, visual impairment, hearing impairment, and wheelchair users. A mixed research method was used (questionnaires, interviews, and observations). The results were applied to a design process based on the needs of people with physical disabilities and addressed solving their work problems, increasing their work effectiveness, and bringing the results of the design to a group discussion. The group was made up of 15 experts who were supervisors, representatives of the people with each type of physical disability, instructors, and personnel from the university knowledgeable about universal design for people with disabilities. Architects and designers helped to brainstorm ideas and develop designs that led to production and product testing. Testing was conducted to compare pretest and posttest results using designed products to evaluate the work effectiveness of the people with physical disabilities using statistical analysis (paired t-tests). The results using developed products showed a higher average posttest score than pretest. This indicated a statistically higher work effectiveness (α =0.05) and supports the research hypothesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202246 PMCID: PMC6120262 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3142010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Study and development of a workplace environment for people with disabilities, consulting trainers of 120 people employed at shopping malls, retail, and wholesale companies using questionnaires [2].
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| (i) Male | 50 | 41.67 |
| (ii) Female | 70 | 58.33 |
|
| ||
| Age | ||
| (i) 20-40 years old | 80 | 66.67 |
| (ii) 41-60 years old | 40 | 33.33 |
| (iii) Over 60 years old | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| Education | ||
| (i) Elementary | 60 | 50.00 |
| (ii) High school | 15 | 12.50 |
| (iii) Diploma | 15 | 12.50 |
| (iv) Bachelor degree | 30 | 25.00 |
|
| ||
| Working Experience | ||
| (i) 0-1 years | 63 | 52.49 |
| (ii) 1-5 years | 40 | 33.33 |
| (iii) 5-10 years | 17 | 14.17 |
| (iv) Over 10 years | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| Position | ||
| (i) Apparel | 17 | 14.16 |
| (ii) Food (transport merchandise) | 15 | 12.50 |
| (iii) Bakery | 15 | 12.50 |
| (iv) Warehouse | 9 | 7.49 |
| (v) Reception | 15 | 12.50 |
| (vi) Office Staff | 15 | 12.50 |
| (vii) Telephone Operator | 14 | 11.67 |
| (viii) HRM manager | 20 | 16.67 |
|
| ||
| Income per month (THB), with food allowance of 500 baht per month | ||
| (i) Less than 10,000 | 60 | 50.00 |
| (ii) 10,000-15,000 | 30 | 25.00 |
| (iii) 15,001-20.000 | 10 | 8.33 |
| (iv) More than 20,000 | 20 | 16.67 |
|
| ||
| What is your preferred work position? | ||
| (i) Same | 96 | 80.00 |
| (ii) Other (with suggestions) | 24 | 20.00 |
|
| ||
| Is the disability a barrier to work? | ||
| (i) Yes | 96 | 80.00 |
| (ii) No | 24 | 20.00 |
|
| ||
| Name the areas that is barrier to work | ||
| (i) Office Area | 10 | 8.33 |
| (ii) Dining Area | 5 | 4.167 |
| (iii) Store Area | 20 | 16.67 |
| (iv) Center Area | 5 | 4.167 |
| (v) None | 80 | 66.67 |
|
| ||
| What are the barriers to work? | ||
| (i) Poor environment, such as no lifts, no toilets for the disabled | 40 | 33.33 |
| (ii) Poor facilities, no supportive equipment for workplace | 80 | 66.67 |
| (iii) Other causes | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| The problem found in the workplace environment | ||
| (i) Climbing up and down stairs | 10 | 8.33 |
| (ii) Accessible toilets | 10 | 8.33 |
| (iii) Footpath | 0 | 0 |
| (iv) Loss of direction | 10 | 8.33 |
| (v) Tables, chairs, cabinets and furniture not suited the disabled | 30 | 25.00 |
| (vi) Opening and closing doors | 0 | 0 |
| (vii) Buying and eating foods | 10 | 8.33 |
| (viii) Direction and emergency signage | 10 | 8.33 |
| (ix) Parking | 0 | 0 |
| (x) Electrical appliances | 40 | 33.33 |
| (xi) Other | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| Have you ever been on the work accident? | ||
| (i) No | 70 | 58.33 |
| (ii) Yes | 50 | 41.67 |
|
| ||
| Should the company improve the environment for the disabled? | ||
| (i) Yes | 80 | 66.67 |
| (ii) No | 40 | 33.33 |
|
| ||
| Name the material that should be used with the disabled | ||
| (i) Wood | 50 | 41.67 |
| (ii) Metal | 30 | 25.00 |
| (iii) Animal Hides | 5 | 4.167 |
| (iv) Plastic | 15 | 12.50 |
| (v) Rock and concrete | 5 | 4.167 |
| (vi) Other | 15 | 12.50 |
|
| ||
| Suitable shapes for work are | ||
| (i) Round | 20 | 25.00 |
| (ii) Square | 50 | 41.67 |
| (iii) Rectangle | 50 | 41.67 |
| (iv) Hexagon | 0 | 0 |
| (v) Triangle | 0 | 0 |
| (vi) Other | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| What is the most problematic piece of work furniture? | ||
| (i) Tables | 50 | 41.67 |
| (ii) Chairs | 30 | 25.00 |
| (iii) Cabinets | 20 | 16.67 |
| (iv) Other | 20 | 16.67 |
|
| ||
| What is the most problematic electrical equipment? | ||
| (i) Computer | 50 | 41.67 |
| (ii) Electrical outlets and switches | 30 | 25.00 |
| (iii) Fan | 0 | 0 |
| (iv) Air conditioner | 0 | 0 |
| (v) Copier | 0 | 0 |
| (vi) Scanner | 20 | 16.67 |
| (vii) Fax | 20 | 16.67 |
| (viii) Other | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| Should the company improve the workplace facilities for the disabled? | ||
| (i) Yes | 70 | 58.33 |
| (ii) No | 50 | 41.67 |
|
| ||
| What is the most problematic office equipment? | ||
| (i) Stapler | 30 | 25.00 |
| (ii) Cutter | 50 | 41.67 |
| (iii) Punch | 15 | 12.50 |
| (iv) Paper cutter | 5 | 4.167 |
| (v) Stationery, pencil and pens | 15 | 12.50 |
| (vi) Paper clips | 5 | 4.167 |
| (vii) Other | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
| Should the company improve the tools, equipment and machinery for the disabled? | ||
| (i) Yes | 60 | 50.00 |
| (ii) No | 60 | 50.00 |
|
| ||
| Will the improvement of workplace facilities for the disabled create work effectiveness? | ||
| (i) Yes | 80 | 66.67 |
| (ii) No | 40 | 33.33 |
Source: the current study.
Figure 1The researcher collected data in Phase 1 using questionnaires, observations, and interviews with three groups of disabled people in major retail and wholesale companies in Bangkok. The trainer interviews were conducted and data was collected from 120 questionnaires [2]. Source: the current study.
Figure 2Design of a work table, side filing cabinet, and wall cabinet. The work table is adjustable, up and down. The side filing cabinet has an adjustable storage compartment and a wall cabinet that is more easily accessible [2]. Source: the current study.
Figure 3Design of guardrails and barriers, electric switches, mobile and equipment storage compartments (for canes or slates) for the visually impaired [2]. Source: the current study.
Figure 4A mobile application used to assign a task to disabled staff [2]. Source: the current study.
Figure 5Post-use tests of the office furniture and workplace facilities (application) to improve work effectiveness of people with physical disabilities and the deaf in department stores, retail and wholesale companies for 15 people [2]. Source: the current study.
Distribution test of the variable [2].
| Independent Variable Group | Kolmogorov Smirnov | Shapiro-Wilk | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic | df | sig | Statistic | df | sig | |
| Work effectiveness of people with physical disabilities | ||||||
| Test | .185 | 15 | .178 | .912 | 15 | .145 |
| Control | .216 | 15 | .058 | .952 | 15 | .555 |
(α: 0.05)
Source: the current study.
Comparison of pre-use and post-use tests of the office furniture and workplace facilities to improve work effectiveness of people with physical disabilities in department stores, retail and wholesale companies for 15 people. A composite score was given by the users based on safety, basis in universal design, usability, and suitability for the workplace (0-5 scores were assigned for each category with a total possible score of 20) [2].
| Independent Variable |
| SD | d | Std. | t | df | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-use testing | 13.0667 | 2.93906 | -1.600 | 1.76473 | -3.511 | 14 | 0.003 |
| Post-use testing | 14.667 | 2.69037 |
(α: 0.05)
Source: the current study.