Bonnie T Zima1, Michael McCreary2, Kristen Kenan3, Michelle Churchey-Mims4, Hannah Chi5, Madeline Brady4, Jewel Davies4, Vikki Rompala4, Bennett Leventhal6. 1. UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 2. UCLA Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL. 4. Metropolitan Family Services, Chicago, IL. 5. Erie West Town Family Health Center, Chicago, IL. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of two integrated care models using a partnered formative evaluation approach across a private foundation, clinic leaders, providers and staff, and a university-based research center. Design: Retrospective cohort study using multiple data sources. Setting: Two federal qualified health care centers serving low-income children and families in Chicago. Participants: Private foundation, clinic and academic partners. Interventions: Development of two integrated care models and partnered evaluation design. Main Outcome Measures: Accomplishments and early lessons learned. Results: Together, the foundation-clinic-academic partners worked to include best practices in two integrated care models for children while developing the evaluation design. A shared data collection approach, which empowered the clinic partners to collect data using a web-based tool for a prospective longitudinal cohort study, was also created. Conclusion: Across three formative evaluation stages, the foundation, clinic, and academic partners continued to reach beyond their respective traditional roles of project oversight, clinical service, and research as adjustments were collectively made to accommodate barriers and unanticipated events. Together, an innovative shared data collection approach was developed that extends partnered research to include data collection being led by the clinic partners and supported by the technical resources of a university-based research center.
Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of two integrated care models using a partnered formative evaluation approach across a private foundation, clinic leaders, providers and staff, and a university-based research center. Design: Retrospective cohort study using multiple data sources. Setting: Two federal qualified health care centers serving low-income children and families in Chicago. Participants: Private foundation, clinic and academic partners. Interventions: Development of two integrated care models and partnered evaluation design. Main Outcome Measures: Accomplishments and early lessons learned. Results: Together, the foundation-clinic-academic partners worked to include best practices in two integrated care models for children while developing the evaluation design. A shared data collection approach, which empowered the clinic partners to collect data using a web-based tool for a prospective longitudinal cohort study, was also created. Conclusion: Across three formative evaluation stages, the foundation, clinic, and academic partners continued to reach beyond their respective traditional roles of project oversight, clinical service, and research as adjustments were collectively made to accommodate barriers and unanticipated events. Together, an innovative shared data collection approach was developed that extends partnered research to include data collection being led by the clinic partners and supported by the technical resources of a university-based research center.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child Mental Health; Formative Evaluation; Integrated Care; Partnered Research
Authors: Gregory Clarke; Lynn Debar; Frances Lynch; James Powell; John Gale; Elizabeth O'Connor; Evette Ludman; Terry Bush; Elizabeth H B Lin; Michael Von Korff; Stephanie Hertert Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Cheryl B Stetler; Marcia W Legro; Carolyn M Wallace; Candice Bowman; Marylou Guihan; Hildi Hagedorn; Barbara Kimmel; Nancy D Sharp; Jeffrey L Smith Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow; Lisa H Jaycox; Naihua Duan; Anne P LaBorde; Margaret M Rea; Pamela Murray; Martin Anderson; Christopher Landon; Lingqi Tang; Kenneth B Wells Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272