| Literature DB >> 30202173 |
Harsh Kapil1, D K Suresh2, Shalu Chandna Bathla2, Karandeep Singh Arora3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential benefits of local application of Thymoquinone gel as an adjunctive to scaling and root planing (SRP) in subjects with chronic periodontitis.Entities:
Keywords: Alkaline phosphatase; Gingival index; Plaque index; Probing pocket depth; Relative attachment level; Thymoquinone
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202173 PMCID: PMC6128318 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Fig. 1(Group I) (a) Preoperative pocket probing depth, (b) postoperative pocket probing depth, (c) preoperative relative attachment level, (d) postoperative relative attachment level.
Fig. 2(Group II) (a) Preoperative pocket probing depth, (b) postoperative pocket probing depth, (c) preoperative relative attachment level, (d) postoperative relative attachment level.
Mean and mean differences in clinical (plaque index, gingival index, pocket probing depth and relative attachment level) and biochemical (alkaline phosphatase enzyme level) parameters of Group I and Group II.
| Group I | Group II | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Sites | At baseline (preoperative) | At 6 weeks (postoperative) | Mean difference | Z | p value | No. of Sites | At baseline (preoperative) | At 6 weeks (postoperative) | Mean difference | Z | p value | |
| PI | 20 | 2.55 ± 0.510 | 1.20 ± 0.410 | 1.350 ± 0.587 | -3.95 | 0.001 | 20 | 2.55 ± 0.510 | 1.45 ± 0.510 | 1.100 ± 0.552 | -3.97 | 0.001 |
| GI | 20 | 2.45 ± 0.605 | 1.20 ± 0.410 | 1.250 ± 0.638 | -3.85 | 0.001 | 20 | 2.45 ± 0.605 | 1.25 ± 0.444 | 1.20 ± 0.615 | -3.87 | 0.001 |
| PPD | 20 | 5.25 ± 0.550 | 3.25 ± 0.716 | 2.000 ± 0.725 | -4.06 | 0.001 | 20 | 5.25 ± 0.550 | 3.80 ± 0.768 | 1.450 ± 0.686 | -3.85 | 0.001 |
| RAL | 20 | 9.05 ± 2.064 | 7.05 ± 2.038 | 2.00 ± 0.725 | -4.06 | 0.001 | 20 | 8.40 ± 2.280 | 6.95 ± 2.282 | 1.450 ± 0.686 | -3.85 | 0.001 |
| ALP | 20 | 350.450 ± 113.737 | 226.900 ± 79.566 | 123.55 ± 61.374 | t | 0.001 | 20 | 386.200 ± 119.628 | 297.700 ± 102.517 | 88.5 ± 46.527 | t | 0.001 |
| 9.003 | 8.506 | |||||||||||
p < 0.001.
Highly significant.
Mean differences of various parameters comparison between Group I and Group II.
| Group I | Group II | Mean difference | t | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI | 1.350 ± 0.587 | 1.100 ± 0.552 | 0.250 | 1.387 | 0.174 |
| GI | 1.250 ± 0.638 | 1.200 ± 0.615 | 0.050 | 0.252 | 0.802 |
| PPD | 2.000 ± 0.725 | 1.450 ± 0.686 | 0.550 | 2.463 | 0.018 |
| RAL | 2.000 ± 0.725 | 1.450 ± 0.686 | 0.550 | 2.463 | 0.018 |
| ALP | 123.55 ± 61.374 | 88.5 ± 46.527 | 35.050 | 2.035 | 0.048 |
p < 0.05.
Significant.
Minimum inhibitory concentration results of 0.2% Thymoquinone gel against Porphyromonasgingivalis (Pg), Aggregatibacteractinomycetemcomitans (Aa) and Prevotellaintermedia (Pi).
| Dilution Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pg | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Aa | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Pi | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R |
S-Sensitive, R-Resistant.