Literature DB >> 30201569

Comparative study on disintegration methods for oral film preparations.

Isabell Speer1, Denise Steiner2, Yasmin Thabet3, Jörg Breitkreutz3, Arno Kwade2.   

Abstract

Orodispersible films (ODFs) provide high application comfort due to rapid disintegration in the oral cavity. They increasingly found the approval of pharmaceutical research and development and were added to the European Pharmacopeia in 2012. The European Pharmacopeia explicitly demands disintegration testing for ODFs, but does not refer to a suitable method. The aim of this study was to collect and evaluate existing disintegration methods regarding their suitability to investigate different ODF formulations. Therefore, 21 ODF formulations produced at different gap heights and/or different amounts of suspended microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) particles were manufactured by solvent casting technique, using hypromellose (HPMC) as film-forming polymer. Four disintegration methods described in literature were applied to characterize the disintegration behavior of these formulations. They were the petri dish, the slide frame, slide frame and ball (SFaB) method as well as the PharmaTest® disintegration tester equipped with a film sample holder. All methods show similar tendencies, at which the disintegration time proportionally increases with increasing dry film thicknesses. Reduced disintegration times were observed for ODFs containing insoluble MCC particles compared to their corresponding particle-free formulations. However, the suitability to investigate varying types of ODFs applying the four different test methods highly depends on the intended purpose. Therefore, the slide frame and SFaB method seems to be particularly applicable for research and development purposes, whereas the PharmaTest® disintegration tester and the SFaB method fulfil the demands required for testing methods within the quality control.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disintegration methods; Disintegration time; Fast disintegrating films; Mechanical strength; Microcrystalline cellulose; Orodispersible films; Solvent casting; Suspended particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30201569     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  6 in total

1.  Development, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Racecadotril Orodispersible Films for Pediatric Use.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Liuliu Yang; Bing Wang; Chunlin Luo; Yuhan Wang; Hao Wang; Fang Chen; Xiaoqiang Xiang
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Fabrication and Characterization of Orodispersible Composite Film from Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose-Crosslinked Carboxymethyl Rice Starch.

Authors:  Ornanong S Kittipongpatana; Karnkamol Trisopon; Phanphen Wattanaarsakit; Nisit Kittipongpatana
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04

3.  Concept of Orodispersible or Mucoadhesive "Tandem Films" and Their Pharmaceutical Realization.

Authors:  Anja Göbel; Jörg Breitkreutz
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  Modernising Orodispersible Film Characterisation to Improve Palatability and Acceptability Using a Toolbox of Techniques.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Marc Masen; Philippa Cann; Ben Hanson; Catherine Tuleu; Mine Orlu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Investigation of Patient-Centric 3D-Printed Orodispersible Films Containing Amorphous Aripiprazole.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Lee; Chulhun Park; In-Ok Song; Beom-Jin Lee; Chin-Yang Kang; Jun-Bom Park
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Orodispersible Films: A Delivery Platform for Solid Lipid Nanoparticles?

Authors:  Denise Steiner; Jakob F Emmendörffer; Heike Bunjes
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.