Literature DB >> 30201398

Impact of preoperative biopsy sampling on severe submucosal fibrosis on endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a propensity score analysis.

Shusei Fukunaga1, Yasuaki Nagami1, Masatsugu Shiba1, Taishi Sakai1, Hirotsugu Maruyama1, Masaki Ominami1, Koji Otani1, Shuhei Hosomi1, Fumio Tanaka1, Koichi Taira1, Tetsuya Tanigawa1, Hirokazu Yamagami1, Toshio Watanabe1, Yasuhiro Fujiwara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is believed that preoperative biopsy sampling for superficial-type colorectal tumors should be avoided because submucosal fibrosis caused by biopsy sampling makes EMR impossible. However, few studies have reported the influence of biopsy sampling on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to examine the effect of biopsy sampling on submucosal fibrosis and treatment outcomes of ESD for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs).
METHODS: Between April 2005 and September 2015, 441 consecutive patients underwent colorectal ESD in Osaka City University Hospital. Using propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), we retrospectively evaluated risk factors for severe submucosal fibrosis and treatment outcomes for patients with LSTs, with or without preoperative biopsy sampling.
RESULTS: A total of 428 LSTs resected using ESD were enrolled. After matching, there were 136 matched pairs of lesions that did or did not undergo biopsy sampling. Preoperative biopsy sampling increased severe fibrosis compared with that in the non-biopsy sampling group (20.6% vs 11.0%; P = .03) and was significantly associated with severe fibrosis after matching (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.10; P = .03). After adjustment with IPTW, biopsy sampling also increased the risk of severe fibrosis (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.17-4.63; P = .02). However, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biopsy sampling for colorectal LSTs might cause severe submucosal fibrosis but has no adverse influence on clinical outcomes of ESD.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30201398     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  Effect of Preceding Biopsy on the Results of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumor.

Authors:  Sang Pyo Lee; In-Kyung Sung; Jeong Hwan Kim; Sun-Young Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Predictive Factors of Mild and Severe Fibrosis in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Hideyuki Chiba; Jun Tachikawa; Jun Arimoto; Keiichi Ashikari; Hiroki Kuwabara; Michiko Nakaoka; Toru Goto; Ken Ohata; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Factors for conversion risk of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yuki Kamigaichi; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Masaki Kunihiro; Toshio Kuwai; Yuko Hiraga; Akira Furudoi; Seiji Onogawa; Hideharu Okanobu; Takeshi Mizumoto; Tomohiro Miwata; Shiro Okamoto; Kenichi Yoshimura; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Prospective comparison of diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy and biopsy for sessile serrated adenoma/polyp.

Authors:  Takeshi Yamashina; Takeshi Setoyama; Azusa Sakamoto; Noboru Hanaoka; Takehiko Tsumura; Takanori Maruo; Hiroyuki Marusawa
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Early Colon Cancer That Changed Its Morphology Twice.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Kono; Shusei Fukunaga; Yasuaki Nagami; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection: An alternative resection modality for large laterally spreading tumors in the cecum?

Authors:  Xiang-Yao Wang; Ning-Li Chai; Ya-Qi Zhai; Long-Song Li; Zan-Tao Wang; Jia-Le Zou; Yong-Sheng Shi; En-Qiang Linghu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.

Authors:  Chi Woo Samuel Chow; Tak Lit Derek Fung; Pak Tat Chan; Kam Hung Kwok
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Predictors for Submucosal Fibrosis in Patients With Superficial Squamous Esophageal Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Xiaoduan Zhuang; Ming Xu; Zhenyu Chen; Jianqi Wang; Kai Qian; Shihao Wang; Guoming Deng; Yang Bai
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.396

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.