Literature DB >> 30201266

Extravasation of Brownian Spheroidal Nanoparticles through Vascular Pores.

Preyas N Shah1, Tiras Y Lin1, Ioana L Aanei2, Sarah H Klass2, Bryan Ronain Smith3, Eric S G Shaqfeh4.   

Abstract

In modern cancer treatment, there is significant interest in studying the use of drug molecules either directly injected into the bloodstream or delivered by nanoparticle (NP) carriers of various shapes and sizes. During treatment, these carriers may extravasate through pores in the tumor vasculature that form during angiogenesis. We provide an analytical, computational, and experimental examination of the extravasation of point particles (e.g., drug molecules) and finite-sized spheroidal particles. We study the advection-diffusion process in a model microvasculature, consisting of a shear flow over and a pressure-driven suction flow into a circular pore in a flat surface. For point particles, we provide an analytical formula [Formula: see text] for the dimensionless Sherwood number S, i.e., the extravasation rate, in terms of the pore entry resistance (Damköhler number κ), the shear rate (Péclet number P), and the suction flow rate (suction strength Q). Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations verify this result, and our simulations are then extended to include finite-sized NPs, in which no analytical solutions are available. BD simulations indicate that particles of different geometries have drastically different extravasation rates in different flow conditions. In general, extreme aspect ratio particles provide a greater flux through the pore because of favorable alignment with streamlines entering the pore and less hindered interaction with the pore. We validate the BD simulations by measuring the in vitro transport of both bacteriophage MS2 (a spherical NP) and free dye (a model drug molecule) across a porous membrane. Despite their vastly different sizes, BD predicts S = 8.53 E-4 and S = 27.6 E-4, and our experiments agree favorably, with Sexp=10.6 E-4± 1.75 E-4 and Sexp=16.3 E-4 ± 3.09 E-4, for MS2 and free dye, respectively, thus demonstrating the practical utility of our simulation framework.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30201266      PMCID: PMC6139985          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  24 in total

1.  Numerical modeling of drug delivery in a dynamic solid tumor microvasculature.

Authors:  M Sefidgar; M Soltani; K Raahemifar; M Sadeghi; H Bazmara; M Bazargan; M Mousavi Naeenian
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.514

2.  Synthetically Modified Viral Capsids as Versatile Carriers for Use in Antibody-Based Cell Targeting.

Authors:  Adel M ElSohly; Chawita Netirojjanakul; Ioana L Aanei; Astraea Jager; Sean C Bendall; Michelle E Farkas; Garry P Nolan; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated.

Authors:  M Stohrer; Y Boucher; M Stangassinger; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness.

Authors:  H Hashizume; P Baluk; S Morikawa; J W McLean; G Thurston; S Roberge; R K Jain; D M McDonald
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Shape matters: intravital microscopy reveals surprising geometrical dependence for nanoparticles in tumor models of extravasation.

Authors:  Bryan Ronain Smith; Paul Kempen; Donna Bouley; Alexander Xu; Zhuang Liu; Nicholas Melosh; Hongjie Dai; Robert Sinclair; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 6.  High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Carl-Henrik Heldin; Kristofer Rubin; Kristian Pietras; Arne Ostman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Simulation of transport and extravasation of nanoparticles in tumors which exhibit enhanced permeability and retention effect.

Authors:  Vishwa Priya Podduturi; Isidro B Magaña; D Patrick O'Neal; Pedro A Derosa
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Biodistribution of Antibody-MS2 Viral Capsid Conjugates in Breast Cancer Models.

Authors:  Ioana L Aanei; Adel M ElSohly; Michelle E Farkas; Chawita Netirojjanakul; Melanie Regan; Stephanie Taylor Murphy; James P O'Neil; Youngho Seo; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting.

Authors:  Michael M Schmidt; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  Two-dimensional chemotherapy simulations demonstrate fundamental transport and tumor response limitations involving nanoparticles.

Authors:  J Sinek; H Frieboes; X Zheng; V Cristini
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.838

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nanotherapeutic Shots through the Heart of Plaque.

Authors:  Yogendra Kanthi; Adam de la Zerda; Bryan Ronain Smith
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  The Role of in silico Research in Developing Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics.

Authors:  Migara Kavishka Jayasinghe; Chang Yu Lee; Trinh T T Tran; Rachel Tan; Sarah Min Chew; Brendon Zhi Jie Yeo; Wen Xiu Loh; Marco Pirisinu; Minh T N Le
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.