| Literature DB >> 30201046 |
Caroline M Grunenwald1, Erika Butler2, Arno Wünschmann3, Anibal G Armien3, Michelle Carstensen4, Erik Hildebrand4, Roger D Moon5, Richard W Gerhold6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Moose (Alces alces) are a culturally and economically valued species in Minnesota. However, the moose population has experienced a sudden, marked decline in their range, including extirpation in the northwest and a 66% decline in the last decade in the northeast portions of the state. Although the exact cause of this decline is unclear, parasitic metastrongylid and filarioid nematode infections are known causes of morbidity and mortality in moose across North America.Entities:
Keywords: Elaeophora schneideri; Moose (Alces alces); Parasitic infections; Parelaphostrongylus tenuis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30201046 PMCID: PMC6131914 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3077-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Geographical location of tabanid fly trapping sites and MN moose mortality sites. Four individual trapping sites were chosen for fly collection during June-August of 2013. Sites of moose mortalities are marked with circles. The shaded region represents the current MN moose range
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of partial nematode18S sequences (508 bp) obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded CNS tissues of various ruminants. Tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method and the evolutionary distances computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method. Bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown above the branches. The tree is drawn to scale. Reference nematodes are labeled with their respective NCBI GenBank accession number. Markers indicate the detection of double infections (triangles, P. tenuis + E. schneideri; circles, S. yehi + E. schneideri; squares, P. tenuis + S. yehi)
Summary of demographics, histology, and sequence results for Minnesota moose CNS tissues (n = 34; 2004–2013). Negative histology results refer to animals with no pathological changes in the CNS tissues consistent with a nematode infection
| Moose ID | Sex (M/F) | Agea | Histology results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO-32 | F | Adult | Migration tracts present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-19 | F | Calf | Migration tracts present | + | - | + | - |
| MO-27 | F | Adult | Migration tracts present | + | - | + | - |
| MO-6 | F | Adult | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-2 | M | Adult | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-17 | F | Yearling | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-3 | F | Adult | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-25 | M | Calf | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-29 | F | Adult | Migration tracts present | - | + | - | - |
| MO-15 | F | Yearling | Migration tracts present | - | + | + | - |
| MO-21 | M | Yearling | Migration tracts present | - | + | + | - |
| MO-10 | F | Yearling | Migration tracts present | - | - | - | - |
| MO-18 | F | Yearling | Morulae present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-7 | M | Yearling | Morulae present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-1 | F | Calf | Larvae present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-13 | F | Adult | Larvae present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-4 | M | Yearling | Adult, morulae present | + | - | - | + |
| MO-5 | F | Yearling | Adult, morulae present | + | + | - | - |
| MO-35 | F | Calf | Adult present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-26 | M | Calf | Adult present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-33 | F | Yearling | Adult present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-30 | M | Adult | Adult present | + | - | - | - |
| MO-31 | M | Adult | Adult present | + | + | - | - |
| MO-8 | M | Yearling | Negative | + | - | + | - |
| MO-9 | M | Yearling | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-11 | F | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-12 | F | Yearling | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-14 | F | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-16 | F | Calf | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-20 | M | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-22 | M | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-23 | F | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-24 | M | Calf | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| MO-28 | M | Adult | Negative | - | + | - | - |
| Total number of mooseb | 15 | 20 | 5 | 1 | |||
aMoose were categorized as adults (> 2 years-old), yearlings (12–23 months-old), or calves (< 1 year-old)
bTotal number of moose refers to the total number of animals that were sequence-positive for each parasite species
Fly counts per genus and trapping location used in the molecular survey for filarioid nematodes. Trapping locations correspond to the locations detailed in Fig. 1. Number of flies that were PCR-positive for E. schneideri are listed first, followed by the total fly count. Prevalence values (% PCR-positive for E. schneideri) are listed in parentheses
| Fly genus | Anoka County | Grand Portage | Lake County | St. Louis County | Total no. of flies per genus (% prevalence) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/364 (1.4) | 0/103 (0) | 5/18 (27.8) | 21/21 (100) | 31/506 (6.1) | |
| 5/62 (8.1) | 0/6 (0) | 0/34 (0) | 0/0 (0) | 5/102 (4.9) | |
| 0/7 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 0/2 (0) | 0/0 (0) | 0/10 (0) | |
| Total no. of flies per location (% prevalence) | 10/433 (2.3) | 0/110 (0) | 5/54 (9.3) | 21/21 (100) | 36/618 (5.8) |
Fig. 318S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of multiple filarioid nematodes in Minnesota tabanid horseflies. Fifty-four nematode 18S rRNA gene sequences (796 bp) were used in the analysis. Fly isolate F-369 was not included in the analysis due to poor quality sequence data. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method and evolutionary distances computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method. The tree is drawn to scale. Bootstrap values are shown above the branches. Colored markers correspond to fly species and trapping location. Reference nematodes are labeled with their respective NCBI GenBank accession number
Fig. 4Detectable E. schneideri in Minnesota tabanid horseflies varies among fly species and trapping sites. Number of flies tested (a) and prevalence (number of positive flies / total number of flies) (b) that were PCR-positive (blue) or negative (black) for E. schneideri was determined based on 18S sequencing results for each trapping location and each of the fly genera tested