Literature DB >> 30200824

Views of nurses and other health and social care workers on the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots in health and social care: a scoping review.

Irena Papadopoulos1, Christina Koulouglioti2,3, Sheila Ali2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robots are introduced in many health and social care settings.
OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the existing evidence related to the views of nurses and other health and social care workers about the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots.
METHODS: Using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines we searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINHAL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore digital library. Nineteen (19) articles met the criteria for inclusion.
RESULTS: Health care workers reported mixed views regarding the use of robots. They considered an array of tasks that robots could perform; they addressed the issue of patient safety and raised concerns about privacy.
CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of studies have explored the views of health care workers about the use of robots. Considering the fast pace with which technology is advancing in the care field, it is critical to conduct more research in this area. Impact Statement: Robots will increasingly have a role to play in nursing, health and social care. The potential impact will be challenging for the healthcare workforce. It is therefore important for nurses and other health and social care workers to engage in discussion regarding the contribution of robots and their impact not only on nursing care but also on future roles of health and social care workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal-like robots; healthcare professionals; humanoid robots; nurses; robots; social care workers; views

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30200824     DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1519374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Nurse        ISSN: 1037-6178            Impact factor:   1.787


  5 in total

1.  Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Irena Papadopoulos; Christina Koulouglioti; Runa Lazzarino; Sheila Ali
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop.

Authors:  Theresa Sophie Busse; Sven Kernebeck; Larissa Nef; Patrick Rebacz; Ilona Kickbusch; Jan Peter Ehlers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  UNRAQ-A Questionnaire for the Use of a Social Robot in Care for Older Persons. A Multi-Stakeholder Study and Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Slawomir Tobis; Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska; Sylwia Kropinska; Aleksandra Suwalska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Nursing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christine Buchanan; M Lyndsay Howitt; Rita Wilson; Richard G Booth; Tracie Risling; Megan Bamford
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 5.  Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christine Buchanan; M Lyndsay Howitt; Rita Wilson; Richard G Booth; Tracie Risling; Megan Bamford
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2021-01-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.