| Literature DB >> 30200354 |
Qingjie Zhang1,2, Xinfu Zhao3, Gang Sui4, Xiaoping Yang5.
Abstract
A surface-sizing technique was offered to take full advantage of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Entities:
Keywords: MWCNTs; epoxy; interfacial interaction; nanocomposites; surface sizing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30200354 PMCID: PMC6165148 DOI: 10.3390/nano8090680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Simulated molecular structures employed in the molecular dynamic (MD) simulation: (a) diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA), (b) 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl methane (DDM), (c) n-butyl glycidylether (BuGE) and (d) benzyl glycidylether (BeGE), where carbon is shown in gray, oxygen in red, nitrogen in blue and hydrogen in white.
Figure 2Reaction mechanism of surface sizing treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs).
Figure 3Optical images and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) (inset) micrographs of (a) MWCNT-NH2, (b) MWCNT-BuGE and (c) MWCNT-BeGE. The sedimentation behavior of (I) MWCNT-NH2, (II) MWCNT-BuGE and (III) MWCNT-BeGE in the ethanol solution after standing for (d) 1 h and (e) 24 h under 25 °C.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photographs of (a) MWCNT-NH2, (b) MWCNT-BuGE and (c) MWCNT-BeGE.
Figure 5Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra of MWCNT-NH2, MWCNT-BuGE and MWCNT-BeGE.
Figure 6X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) N1s curve fitting peak of (a) MWCNT-NH2, (b) MWCNT-BuGE and (c) MWCNT-BeGE.
N1s peak area of MWCNT-NH2, MWCNT-BuGE and MWCNT-BeGE.
| Samples | C–N–C | C–NH2 | –NH–C=O |
|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNT-NH2 | 31.4 | 35.0 | 33.6 |
| MWCNT-BuGE | 38.0 | 33.5 | 28.5 |
| MWCNT-BeGE | 36.7 | 31.9 | 31.4 |
Figure 7Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (a) and Raman spectra (b) of MWCNT-NH2, MWCNT-BuGE and MWCNT-BeGE.
Figure 8Dynamic contact angle of DGEBA on MWCNT-NH2, MWCNT-BuGE and MWCNT-BeGE films varies with time at room temperature (Inset image is the contact angle measurement process with side view of DGEBA on the MWCNT film).
Figure 9Raman mapping of G band of (a) MWCNT-NH2/epoxy nanocomposites, (b) MWCNT-NH2/epoxy nanocomposites with 1% bending load, (c) MWCNT-BuGE/epoxy nanocomposites, (d) MWCNT-BuGE/epoxy nanocomposites with 1% bending load, (e) MWCNT-BeGE/epoxy nanocomposites and (f) MWCNT-BeGE/epoxy nanocomposites with 1% bending load. Color-code: quantities related to MWCNTs are given in color, those of the epoxy matrix—in black.
Figure 10Schematics of interfacial microstructure of (a) MWCNT-BuGE/epoxy nanocomposites and (b) MWCNT-BeGE/epoxy nanocomposites; (c) the calculated intermolecular interaction energy of MWCNT-BuGE/epoxy and MWCNT-BeGE/epoxy during the relaxation process.
Figure 11Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs of fracture surface: (a) neat epoxy, (b) MWCNT-NH2/epoxy, (c) MWCNT-BuGE/epoxy and (d) MWCNT-BeGE/epoxy. Inset, high-magnification micrographs of dispersed MWCNTs in epoxy nanocomposites.
Figure 12(a) Typical flexural stress-displacement curves, (b) the corresponding flexural strength and (c) flexural modulus of different nanocomposites.
Comparison of flexural properties between this study and other researches for MWCNT/DGEBA systems.
| CNT Type | Content (wt.%) | Flexural Strength/Mpa | Flexural Modulus/GPa | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Composites | Control | Composites | |||
| MWCNT-NH2 | 0.5 | 107 | 128 (19.6%) | 2.92 | 3.51 (20.2%) | [ |
| MWCNT-NH2 | 0.5 | 90 | 102 (13.3%) | 1.88 | 2.21 (17.6%) | [ |
| MWCNT-NH2 | 0.6 | 86 | 109 (26.7%) | 2.21 | 2.69 (21.7%) | [ |
| MWCNT derivatives | 1 | 109 | 122 (12.1%) | - | - | [ |
| MWCNT-NH2 | 0.5 | 122 | 135 (10.7%) | 2.62 | 3.22 (22.9%) | This study |
| MWCNT-BuGE | 0.5 | 122 | 141 (15.6%) | 2.62 | 3.41 (30.1%) | This study |
| MWCNT-BeGE | 0.5 | 122 | 150 (22.9%) | 2.62 | 3.61 (37.8%) | This study |