Literature DB >> 30199803

Determination of mechanical properties of biofilms by modelling the deformation measured using optical coherence tomography.

Cristian Picioreanu1, Florian Blauert2, Harald Horn2, Michael Wagner2.   

Abstract

The advantage of using non-invasive imaging such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) to asses material properties from deformed biofilm geometries can be compromised by the assumptions made on fluid forces acting on the biofilm. This study developed a method for the determination of elastic properties of biofilms by modelling the biofilm deformation recorded by OCT imaging with poroelastic fluid-structure interaction computations. Two-dimensional biofilm geometries were extracted from OCT scans of non-deformed and deformed structures as a result of hydrodynamic loading. The biofilm geometries were implemented in a model coupling fluid dynamics with elastic solid mechanics and Darcy flow in the biofilm. The simulation results were compared with real deformed geometries and a fitting procedure allowed estimation of the Young's modulus in given flow conditions. The present method considerably improves the estimation of elastic moduli of biofilms grown in mini-fluidic rectangular channels. This superior prediction is based on the relaxation of several simplifying assumptions made in past studies: shear stress is not anymore taken constant over the biofilm surface, total stress including also pressure is accounted for, any biofilm shape can be used in the determinations, and non-linear behavior of mechanical properties can be estimated. Biofilm elastic moduli between 70 and 700 Pa were obtained and biofilm hardening at large applied stress due to increasing flow velocity was quantified. The work performed here opens the way for in-situ determination of other mechanical properties (e.g., viscoelastic properties, relaxation times, plastic yields) and provides data for modelling biofilm deformation and detachment with eventual applications in biofilm control and removal strategies.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biofilm mechanics; Elastic modulus; Fluid-structure interaction; Imaging; Poroelastic model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199803     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  8 in total

Review 1.  The biofilm matrix: multitasking in a shared space.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Eric D van Hullebusch; Thomas R Neu; Per H Nielsen; Thomas Seviour; Paul Stoodley; Jost Wingender; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 78.297

2.  A microfluidic platform for characterizing the structure and rheology of biofilm streamers.

Authors:  Giovanni Savorana; Jonasz Słomka; Roman Stocker; Roberto Rusconi; Eleonora Secchi
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 3.  Regulating, Measuring, and Modeling the Viscoelasticity of Bacterial Biofilms

Authors:  Samuel G V Charlton; Michael A White; Saikat Jana; Lucy E Eland; Pahala Gedara Jayathilake; J Grant Burgess; Jinju Chen; Anil Wipat; Thomas P Curtis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Computational and Experimental Investigation of Biofilm Disruption Dynamics Induced by High-Velocity Gas Jet Impingement.

Authors:  Lledó Prades; Stefania Fabbri; Antonio D Dorado; Xavier Gamisans; Paul Stoodley; Cristian Picioreanu
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 5.  Biofilm mechanics: Implications in infection and survival.

Authors:  Erin S Gloag; Stefania Fabbri; Daniel J Wozniak; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  The response of dual-species bacterial biofilm to 2% and 5% NaOCl mixed with etidronic acid: A laboratory real-time evaluation using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mariana Maciel Batista Borges; René J B Dijkstra; Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Michel Versluis; Lucas W M van der Sluis; Xenos Petridis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Damage Repair versus Aging in an Individual-Based Model of Biofilms.

Authors:  Robyn J Wright; Robert J Clegg; Timothy L R Coker; Jan-Ulrich Kreft
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Biofilm viscoelasticity and nutrient source location control biofilm growth rate, migration rate, and morphology in shear flow.

Authors:  Hoa Nguyen; Abraham Ybarra; Hakan Başağaoğlu; Orrin Shindell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.