Literature DB >> 30199784

Pulmonary embolism in Europe - Burden of illness in relationship to healthcare resource utilization and return to work.

Stefan N Willich1, Ling-Hsiang Chuang2, Ben van Hout3, Pearl Gumbs4, David Jimenez5, Sonja Kroep2, Rupert Bauersachs6, Manuel Monreal7, Giancarlo Agnelli8, Alexander Cohen9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a substantial economic burden. However evidence from patients in Europe is scarce. The aim of this study was to report the impacts of PE on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and return to work using the PREFER in VTE registry.
METHODS: The PREFER in VTE registry was a prospective, observational, multicenter study in seven European countries, aiming to provide data concerning treatment patterns, HCRU, mortality, quality of life and work-loss. Patients with a first-time or recurrent PE were included and followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Treatment patterns, re-hospitalization rates, length of hospital stays (LOS), and ambulatory/office visits, as well as proportion of patients returning to work, were assessed. Subgroups by country and with/without active cancer were examined separately. Zero-inflated negative binomial and Cox regression were applied to investigate the relationship between baseline characteristics and LOS and return to work, respectively.
RESULTS: Amongst 1399 patients with PE, 53.2% were male and the average age was 62.3 ± 17.1 years old. Overall, patients were treated with combinations of heparin, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and the non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (50.0% treated with the combination of heparin with VKA). Patients with active cancer were primarily treated with heparin (84.9%). NOACs were used more frequently in DACH (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) and France (55.2% and 32.6%) compared to Italy and Spain (4.5% and 6.1%). The VTE-related re-hospitalization rate within 12 months and the average LOS varied substantially between countries, from 26.2% in UK to 12.3% in France, and from 12.9 days in Italy to 3.9 days in France. PE patients were often co-managed by general practitioners in France and DACH (>84%), and less frequently in other countries (<47%). The regression results confirmed the country variation of HCRU. Of the employed patients (n = 385), 60% returned to work at 1 month but 27.8% had not after one year. PE patients with DVT were more likely to return to work. Active cancer was a significant predictor for not returning to work, as well as smoking history.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment of PE differed between patients with active cancer and patients without active cancer. VTE-related resource utilization differed markedly between countries. While the reported 'not return to work' was high for patients with PE, this may at least in part reflect the presence of co-morbidities such as cancer.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199784     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  7 in total

1.  The impact of co-morbidity on the disease burden of VTE.

Authors:  Sonja Kroep; Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Alexander Cohen; Pearl Gumbs; Ben van Hout; Manuel Monreal; Stefan N Willich; Anselm Gitt; Rupert Bauersachs; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Effect of tailoring anticoagulant treatment duration by applying a recurrence risk prediction model in patients with venous thromboembolism compared to usual care: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Geert-Jan Geersing; Janneke M T Hendriksen; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Kit C Roes; Ruud Oudega; Toshihiko Takada; Roger E G Schutgens; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Health-related quality of life and mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in seven European countries.

Authors:  Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Pearl Gumbs; Ben van Hout; Giancarlo Agnelli; Sonja Kroep; Manuel Monreal; Rupert Bauersachs; Stephen N Willich; Anselm Gitt; Patrick Mismetti; Alexander Cohen; David Jimenez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The Risk of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Pemphigus: A Population-Based Large-Scale Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Khalaf Kridin; Mouhammad Kridin; Kyle T Amber; Guy Shalom; Doron Comaneshter; Erez Batat; Arnon D Cohen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Reducing the hospital burden associated with the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Adam J Singer
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Ruling out pulmonary embolism across different healthcare settings: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert-Jan Geersing; Toshihiko Takada; Frederikus A Klok; Harry R Büller; D Mark Courtney; Yonathan Freund; Javier Galipienzo; Gregoire Le Gal; Waleed Ghanima; Jeffrey A Kline; Menno V Huisman; Karel G M Moons; Arnaud Perrier; Sameer Parpia; Helia Robert-Ebadi; Marc Righini; Pierre-Marie Roy; Maarten van Smeden; Milou A M Stals; Philip S Wells; Kerstin de Wit; Noémie Kraaijpoel; Nick van Es
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model.

Authors:  David Jiménez; Carmen Rodríguez; Beatriz Pintado; Andrea Pérez; Luis Jara-Palomares; Raquel López-Reyes; Pedro Ruiz-Artacho; Alberto García-Ortega; Behnood Bikdeli; José Luis Lobo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.