Literature DB >> 30199755

Effects of weak static magnetic fields on the gene expression of seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Sunil K Dhiman1, Paul Galland2.   

Abstract

Magnetic-field reception of animals and plants is currently discussed in the framework of a cryptochrome-based radical-pair mechanism. Efforts to unravel magnetoreception in plants suffered historically from several shortcomings, most prominently, the conspicuous absence of detailed stimulus-response relationships. To determine the sensitivity of seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana to weak static magnetic fields we generated stimulus-response curves between near zero and 188 μT for the transcript levels of the genes rbcl, cab4, pal4 and ef1. The moderate magneto-responsiveness of dark-grown seedlings was greatly enhanced under blue light, and for rbcl and pal4 also under red light. The stimulus-response curves obtained under blue light of constant photon-fluence rate displayed multiple maxima and thus a pattern fundamentally different from that prevalent in plant and animal physiology. A double mutant lacking cryptochromes 1 and 2 displayed altered stimulus-response curves without losing, however, magneto-responsiveness completely. A reversal of the magnetic field direction substantially affected the gene expression and the quantity of CAB-protein (chlorophyll a,b-binding protein). The majority of our results are at variance with the notion of cryptochromes acting as the only magnetic-field sensors. They do not, however, exclude the possibility that cryptochromes participate in the magnetic field reception of Arabidopsis. The findings have the unexpected implication that cryptochrome- and phytochrome-mediated plant responses can be modulated by the strength and the orientation of the local geomagnetic field.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis; Cryptochrome; Magnetic field reversal; Magnetoreception; Radical-pair mechanism; Static magnetic field; Stimulus-response relationships

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199755     DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0176-1617            Impact factor:   3.549


  7 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic field regulates plant functions, growth and enhances tolerance against environmental stresses.

Authors:  Ramalingam Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2019-08-21

2.  Effects of weak static magnetic fields on the development of seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Dhiman; Fan Wu; Paul Galland
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Static magnetic field regulates Arabidopsis root growth via auxin signaling.

Authors:  Yue Jin; Wei Guo; Xupeng Hu; Mengmeng Liu; Xiang Xu; Fenhong Hu; Yiheng Lan; Chenkai Lv; Yanwen Fang; Mengyu Liu; Tieliu Shi; Shisong Ma; Zhicai Fang; Jirong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differential root and shoot magnetoresponses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ivan A Paponov; Judith Fliegmann; Ravishankar Narayana; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Geomagnetic Field (GMF) Modulates Nutrient Status and Lipid Metabolism during Arabidopsis thaliana Plant Development.

Authors:  Monirul Islam; Gianpiero Vigani; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 6.  Theoretical Concepts in Magnetobiology after 40 Years of Research.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Andrei B Rubin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Mapping of static magnetic fields near the surface of mobile phones.

Authors:  L Zastko; L Makinistian; A Tvarožná; F L Ferreyra; I Belyaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.