Literature DB >> 30199417

Evaluation of an AI-Based Detection Software for Acute Findings in Abdominal Computed Tomography Scans: Toward an Automated Work List Prioritization of Routine CT Examinations.

David J Winkel1, Tobias Heye, Thomas J Weikert, Daniel T Boll, Bram Stieltjes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based triage system for the detection of acute findings in abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a RIS/PACS (Radiology Information System/Picture Archiving and Communication System) search engine, we obtained 100 consecutive abdominal CTs with at least one of the following findings: free-gas, free-fluid, or fat-stranding and 100 control cases with absence of these findings. The CT data were analyzed using a convolutional neural network algorithm previously trained for detection of these findings on an independent sample. The validation of the results was performed on a Web-based feedback system by a radiologist with 1 year of experience in abdominal imaging without prior knowledge of image findings through both visual confirmation and comparison with the clinically approved, written report as the standard of reference. All cases were included in the final analysis, except those in which the whole dataset could not be processed by the detection software. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were then calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 194 cases were included in the analysis, 6 excluded because of technical problems during the extraction of the DICOM datasets from the local PACS. Overall, the algorithm achieved a 93% sensitivity (91/98, 7 false-negative) and 97% specificity (93/96, 3 false-positive) in the detection of acute abdominal findings. Intra-abdominal free gas was detected with a 92% sensitivity (54/59) and 93% specificity (39/42), free fluid with a 85% sensitivity (68/80) and 95% specificity (20/21), and fat stranding with a 81% sensitivity (42/50) and 98% specificity (48/49). False-positive results were due to streak artifacts, partial volume effects, and a misidentification of a diverticulum (each n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm's autonomous detection of acute pathological abdominal findings demonstrated a high diagnostic performance, enabling guidance of the radiology workflow toward prioritization of abdominal CT examinations with acute conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30199417     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: The Radiologist's Role.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  [Artificial Intelligence in radiology : What can be expected in the next few years?]

Authors:  Johannes Haubold
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Identification and classification of pneumonia disease using a deep learning-based intelligent computational framework.

Authors:  Rong Yi; Lanying Tang; Yuqiu Tian; Jie Liu; Zhihui Wu
Journal:  Neural Comput Appl       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Assessment of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Rib Fractures on Whole-Body Trauma Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Thomas Weikert; Luca Andre Noordtzij; Jens Bremerich; Bram Stieltjes; Victor Parmar; Joshy Cyriac; Gregor Sommer; Alexander Walter Sauter
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  A Deep Residual U-Net Algorithm for Automatic Detection and Quantification of Ascites on Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Images Acquired in the Emergency Department: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Hoon Ko; Jimi Huh; Kyung Won Kim; Heewon Chung; Yousun Ko; Jai Keun Kim; Jei Hee Lee; Jinseok Lee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Automated detection of pulmonary embolism from CT-angiograms using deep learning.

Authors:  Heidi Huhtanen; Mikko Nyman; Tarek Mohsen; Arho Virkki; Antti Karlsson; Jussi Hirvonen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 8.  [Artificial intelligence in image evaluation and diagnosis].

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Mentzel
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 0.323

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.