Literature DB >> 30198150

The mRECIST Classification Provides Insight into Tumor Biology for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation.

David D Lee1, Mariya Samoylova2,3, Neil Mehta3, Kaitlyn R Musto1, John P Roberts4, Francis Y Yao3, Denise M Harnois1.   

Abstract

With recent changes in United Network for Organ Sharing policy, patients in the United States with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are likely to spend more time on the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list. The increasing wait time will allow for an opportunity to assess tumor biology prior to LT. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) paradigm provides such a framework for this assessment, and yet little is understood of its utility as it would apply for patients listed for LT in the United States. Through a collaboration between the University of California, San Francisco, and the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, the experience of 772 patients listed for LT were retrospectively reviewed to study the impact of immediate mRECIST classification following locoregional therapy (LRT) on pre- and post-LT outcomes. Patients who had progression of disease (PD; n = 72), failed to respond to LRT (n = 89) at any time point, or did not achieve radiologic complete response (CR; n = 224) were all at significant risk for wait-list dropout (odds ratio [OR] = 12.11, 4.81, and 2.48; respectively). CR identified a cohort of patients who were at a reduced risk for wait-list dropout. However, 24.9% eventually required further intervention while waiting for transplant, and as many as 82.4% were found to have residual HCC on explant pathology. Failure to respond to LRT was associated with increased risk for recurrence (OR = 3.00) more so than PD (OR = 1.36), suggesting that despite PD, patients who eventually can respond to LRT may represent favorable candidates for LT. In conclusion, for patients awaiting LT, the mRECIST assessment provides critical guidance for patient management. Although PD portends a poor prognosis, our findings suggest that further aggressive LRT should be pursued because a response to LRT may yield acceptable results for patients awaiting LT as well as after LT.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30198150     DOI: 10.1002/lt.25333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  10 in total

1.  T2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exception Policies That Prolong Waiting Time Improve the Use of Evidence-based Treatment Practices.

Authors:  Claire Durkin; David E Kaplan; Therese Bittermann
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-08-21

2.  Clinical Study of 2 Radiotherapy Techniques for Semi-Hepatic Alternating Radiotherapy on Diffuse Liver Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jiangzhou Zhang; Shuheng Bai; Xingzhou Zhang; Yanli Yan; Haojing Kang; Guangzu Li; Zhaode Feng; Wen Ma; Hong Sun; Juan Ren
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

3.  Hypoalbuminemia Is a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Independent Risk Factor for Tumor Progression in Low-Risk Bridge to Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Kelley G Núñez; Tyler Sandow; Jai Patel; Mina Hibino; Daniel Fort; Ari J Cohen; Paul Thevenot
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Patient Selection for Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation-Adjusting the Odds?

Authors:  Daniel Seehofer; Henrik Petrowsky; Stefan Schneeberger; Eric Vibert; Jens Ricke; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Jean-Charles Nault; Thomas Berg
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  PD-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts liver-directed therapy response and bridge-to-transplant survival.

Authors:  Kelley G Núñez; Tyler Sandow; Daniel Fort; Mina Hibino; Paige Wright; Ari J Cohen; Paul T Thevenot
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 6.630

6.  Distinct Gene Expression Profiles in Viable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Liver-Directed Therapy.

Authors:  Kelley G Núñez; Tyler Sandow; Meredith A Lakey; Daniel Fort; Ari J Cohen; Paul T Thevenot
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparison of Milan Criteria and AFP Model.

Authors:  Bleuenn Brusset; Jerome Dumortier; Daniel Cherqui; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Ludivine Chapron; Jean-Louis Quesada; Sylvie Radenne; Didier Samuel; Francis Navarro; Sebastien Dharancy; Thomas Decaens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Prognostic Relevance of a Complete Pathologic Response in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michał Grąt; Marek Krawczyk; Jan Stypułkowski; Marcin Morawski; Maciej Krasnodębski; Michał Wasilewicz; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Karolina Grąt; Waldemar Patkowski; Krzysztof Zieniewicz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predictors of Successful Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Bridging or Downstaging in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander Villalobos; William Wagstaff; Mian Guo; James Zhang; Zachary Bercu; Morgan J Whitmore; Mircea M Cristescu; Bill S Majdalany; Joel Wedd; Mehmet Akce; Joseph Magliocca; Nima Kokabi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-07-22

10.  Prospective Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Waitlist for Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Tiffany Cho-Lam Wong; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Ada Lai-Yau Law; Herbert H Pang; Ka-On Lam; Vince Lau; Tracy Yushi Cui; Adrianna Sze-Yin Fong; Sarah Wai-Man Lee; Edwin Chun-Yin Wong; Jeff Wing-Chiu Dai; Albert Chi-Yan Chan; Tan-To Cheung; James Yan-Yue Fung; Rebecca Mei-Wan Yeung; Mai-Yee Luk; To-Wai Leung; Chung-Mau Lo
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 17.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.