Literature DB >> 30198139

Questioning "choice": A multinational metasynthesis of research on directly funded home-care programs for older people.

Maggie FitzGerald Murphy1, Christine Kelly2.   

Abstract

In many developed contexts, home-care services have been overhauled with the intent of increasing control and flexibility for those using social and health services. This change is associated with providing funds directly to individuals, and sometimes their families and supports, to arrange at home-care assistance with the activities of daily living. Directly funded home-care programs, or "direct funding" (DF), are not value-neutral policy interventions, but complex and politicised tools for the enactment of care in contemporary times. In this qualitative metasynthesis, we consider 47 research articles published between 2009 and 2017 that explore various DF programs for older persons in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States to identify core concepts in the literature. We find that choice emerges as a central concern. We then assess the literature to explore the questions: How does the existing literature conceptualise choice, and the mechanisms through which choice is enhanced, in DF programs for older persons? How is choice, and the benefit of choice to older service users, understood in relevant studies? We argue that the concept of "choice" manifests as a normative goal with presumed benefits among the studies reviewed. Particularly when discussing DF for older people, however, it is essential to consider which mechanisms improve care outcomes, rather than focusing on which mechanisms increase choice writ large. In the case of DF, increased choice comes with increased legal responsibilities and often administrative tasks that many older people and their supports find burdensome. Furthermore, there is no evidence that choice over all elements of one's services is the mechanism that improves care experiences. We conclude by presenting alternative models of understanding care emerging from feminist and other critical scholarship to consider if we are, perhaps, asking the wrong questions about why DF is so often preferred over conventional home-care delivery.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice; consumer-directed care; direct payments, individualised funding; home care; self-directed care; self-managed care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30198139     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  5 in total

1.  Exploring the Impacts of COVID-19 Public Health Measures on Community-Dwelling People Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: A Longitudinal, Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jennifer Baumbusch; Heather A Cooke; Kishore Seetharaman; Aneesa Khan; Koushambhi Basu Khan
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.680

2.  Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people.

Authors:  Katharine Orellana; Jill Manthorpe; Anthea Tinker
Journal:  J Soc Work (Lond)       Date:  2020-08-30

3.  Personal Assistants' role in infection prevention and control: Their experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Caroline Norrie; John Woolham; Kritika Samsi; Jill Manthorpe
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-11-03

4.  Self-managed aged home care in Australia - Insights from older people, family carers and service providers.

Authors:  Carmel Laragy; Sophie D Vasiliadis
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Decision-making in home care package spending.

Authors:  Diane Rowland; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  Australas J Ageing       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.111

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.