| Literature DB >> 30197990 |
Monica S Y Ng1,2, Kelly McClymont3, Naomi McCallum4, Rahul Dua5, Katherine Holman6, Bruce Bennetts6,7, Gladys Ho6, Chirag Patel8, Andrew J Mallett1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30197990 PMCID: PMC6127413 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int Rep ISSN: 2468-0249
Figure 1Complement pathway and targets of CFHR5 protein function. The classical and lectin pathways are typically activated during infections. In contrast, the alternative pathway exhibits baseline activation with spontaneous cleavage of C3 to C3(H2O). Complement factor H (CFH)−related proteins downmodulate the alternative pathway by (i) binding C3b to prevent C3 convertase formation, and (ii) enhancing C3b inactivation by complement factor I (CFI). MASP-2, mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease 2; MBL, mannose-binding lectin.
Reported cases of CFHR5 nephropathy
| Paper | Age (yr)/gender | Ethnicity | Proteinuria | Hematuria | Serum C3/C4 | Renal biopsy | ESKD | Inheritance | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gale | Exon 2 + 3 duplication; heterozygous | 30−80 | Greek-Cypriot | Mostly absent, <1.7 g/d if present | Recurrent synpharyngitic hematuria, microscopic hematuria | C3: normal | C3GN | Yes | AD; | Supportive care. |
| Medjeral-Thomas | Exon 2+3 duplication; heterozygous | 46 | Caucasian | Absent | Recurrent synpharyngitic hematuria | C3: normal | C3GN | Yes | AD | NR |
| Besbas | p.Cys269Arg substitution; heterozygous | 16 | Turkish | 2.086 g/d | NR | C3: low | C3GN | No | No family affected | No improvement with steroids (+/− pulse) + enalapril. |
| Xiao | CFHR5–CFHR2 fusion protein; heterozygous | 26 | European American | High-grade | Present | C3: normal | C3GN | NR | AD | NR |
| Togarsimalemath | CFHR1–CFHR5 fusion protein; heterozygous | 8 | Indian | 1.1 g/d | Microscopic hematuria | C3: low | C3GN, DDD | Yes | AD | No improvement with steroid |
| Chen | CFHR2–CFHR5 fusion protein; heterozygous | 2 | German | Present | Present | C3: low | DDD | Yes | AD | Plasma addition enhanced complement activation, plasmapheresis had no effect. Eculizumab reduced complement activation |
AD, autosomal dominant; C3GN, C3 glomerulonephritis; DDD, dense deposit disease; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; NR, not reported.
ESKD in any affected family members.
Figure 2Pedigree of family.
Clinical, histopathological, and genetic features of affected members of family
| Feature | II:2 | II:3 | II:4 | III:11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship | Aunt | Uncle (twin) | Father (twin) | Proband |
| Age at presentation (yr) | 38 | 49 | 38 | 41 |
| Clinical features | Unknown | Unknown | Hypertension | Hypertension |
| Proteinuria at diagnosis | 4 g/d | Present | 3 g/d | Subnephrotic |
| Hematuria at diagnosis | Microscopic | Microscopic | Macroscopic | Microscopic |
| CKD stage | Pre-ESKD | 5 | 5 | 3B |
| Age at native kidney biopsy (yr) | First: 38 | First: 49 | First: 38 | First: 41 |
| Histopathology | MPGN type 1 | MPGN type 1 | MPGN type 1 | Mesangial expansion and hypercellularity |
| Immunofluorescence | Unknown | Complement C3 positive (+) in capillary walls | Complement C3 positive | Complement C3 positive (++/+++) in mesangium + capillary loops |
| Ultrastructure | Dense deposits: subendothelial mesangial epimembranous (rare) | Dense deposits: subendothelial mesangial epimembranous (rare) | Dense deposits: subendothelial mesangial epimembranous (rare) | Dense deposits: subendothelial mesangial subepithelial |
| Genotype | Untested | Untested | ||
| Age at transplantation | — | 55 | 51 | — |
| Graft recurrence | N/A | Positive | Negative | N/A |
| Years posttransplantation at recurrence | N/A | 21 | N/A | N/A |
| Age at death | 51 | — | 73 | — |
| Cause of death | Breast cancer | N/A | Colon cancer | N/A |
CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; MPGN, mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis; N/A, not applicable.
Figure 3Renal biopsy findings. (a) Light microscopy showed diffuse mesangial hypercellularity. (b) C3-dominant immunofluorescence was observed. (c) Subepithelial and subendothelial deposits were observed on electron microscopy.
Key teaching points of this case
| 1. Family medical history and ethnic history provide invaluable clues for the diagnosis of rare genetic renal conditions |
| 2. Internal duplications require tests that can measure changes in copy number, such as Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and genomic hybridization assays |
| 3. Renal−histopathologic−genetic multidisciplinary team approach is critical for diagnosing rare familial renal conditions |
| 4. Genetic testing for asymptomatic family members can provide information regarding their renal risk, identify potential living donors, and prevent unnecessary renal biopsies |
| 5. Consider testing for CFHR5 nephropathy in familial cases of hematuria, chronic kidney disease, and C3 glomerulopathy. |