| Literature DB >> 30197985 |
Ruth F Dubin1, Suzanne Judd2, Rebecca Scherzer1, Michael Shlipak1, David G Warnock3, Mary Cushman4, Mark Sarnak5, Chirag Parikh6, Michael Bennett7, Neil Powe1, Carmen A Peralta1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) are established markers of subclinical acute kidney injury. In persons with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria who are at high risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and death, the associations of these urinary markers with incident ESRD or death is an area of active investigation.Entities:
Keywords: chronic kidney disease; end-stage renal disease; tubular injury; urinary KIM-1; urinary NGAL
Year: 2018 PMID: 30197985 PMCID: PMC6127450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.05.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int Rep ISSN: 2468-0249
Figure 1Cumulative incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), by tertile of urinary neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule−1 (KIM-1), in REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants. Formal tests of the proportional hazards assumption found that the effect of NGAL tertile 3 (T3) on ESRD risk varied over time in unadjusted (P = 0.0003) but not fully adjusted (P = 0.31) analysis, whereas the effect of KIM T3 on ESRD risk varied over time only in fully adjusted analysis (P = 0.044).
Baseline characteristics of REGARDS participants stratified by tertile of urinary NGAL
| Parameter | Tertile of NGAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (n = 490) | 2 (n = 491) | 3 (n = 491) | ||
| Range of NGAL, ng/ml | 0.1–26.4 | 26.5–81.4 | 81.5–5447 | |
| Age, yr | 71 (64–77) | 72 (64–78) | 70 (63–78) | 0.31 |
| Female gender | 145 (30%) | 223 (45%) | 310 (63%) | <.0001 |
| Race | ||||
| Black | 187 (38%) | 251 (51%) | 268 (55%) | <.0001 |
| White | 303 (62%) | 240 (49%) | 223 (45%) | |
| Income | 0.0021 | |||
| <$34k | 248 (59%) | 293 (68%) | 27 (6%) | |
| $35–74k | 133 (32%) | 109 (25%) | 99 (23%) | |
| $75k and above | 41 (10%) | 27 (6%) | 25 (6%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 246 (51%) | 230 (47%) | 241 (49%) | 0.55 |
| Hypertension | 419 (86%) | 414 (85%) | 422 (86%) | 0.92 |
| History of MI | 206 (43%) | 163 (34%) | 168 (35%) | 0.0091 |
| History of stroke | 59 (12%) | 82 (17%) | 80 (16%) | 0.075 |
| Cancer | 83 (25%) | 57 (17%) | 62 (20%) | 0.061 |
| Current alcohol use | 184 (38%) | 177 (36%) | 170 (35%) | 0.24 |
| Cigarette smoking | 0.73 | |||
| Current | 75 (15%) | 87 (18%) | 78 (16%) | |
| Past | 217 (44%) | 204 (42%) | 203 (41%) | |
| Never | 196 (40%) | 199 (41%) | 209 (43%) | |
| ASA | 271 (55%) | 256 (52%) | 239 (49%) | 0.11 |
| Lipid-lowering Rx | 239 (49%) | 213 (44%) | 213 (44%) | 0.17 |
| Systolic BP, mm Hg | 134 (123–145) | 137 (124–149) | 134 (123–148) | 0.14 |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 78 (69–82) | 79 (70–83) | 78 (70–83) | 0.39 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29 (26–34) | 29 (25–34) | 30 (25–35) | 0.42 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 103 (91–114) | 102 (91–112) | 100 (91–111) | 0.092 |
| LDL, mg/dl | 99 (80–125) | 106 (81–127) | 104 (82–128) | 0.13 |
| HDL, mg/dl | 42 (34–52) | 44 (36–56) | 45 (37–57) | 0.0003 |
| TG, mg/dl | 136 (93–198) | 126 (92–188) | 130 (93–187) | 0.20 |
| CRP, mg/l | 3.0 (1.4–5.9) | 3.5 (1.5–8.6) | 4.9 (1.9–9.9) | <.0001 |
| ACR, mg/g | 94 (50–287) | 105 (50–482) | 142 (61–677) | <.0001 |
| eGFRcyscr | 49 (39–57) | 45 (34–55) | 44 (30–53) | <.0001 |
| eGFRcys | 43 (34–49) | 40 (29–48) | 37 (26–47) | <.0001 |
| eGFRcr | 55 (45–68) | 53 (38–66) | 51 (35–63) | <.0001 |
ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ASA, aspirin; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFRcr, estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine; eGFRcys, estimated glomerular filtration rate cystatin; eGFRcyscr, estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine-cystatin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin; REGARDS, REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke; Rx, prescription; TG, triglyceride.
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).
Baseline characteristics of REGARDS participants, stratified by tertile of urinary KIM-1
| Parameter | Tertile of KIM-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (n = 490) | 2 (n = 491) | 3 (n = 490) | ||
| Range of KIM-1, pg/ml | 15.8–587 | 589–1378 | 1380–28,631 | |
| Age, yr | 71 (64–78) | 71 (65–78) | 70 (63–77) | 0.38 |
| Female gender | 250 (51%) | 213 (43%) | 214 (44%) | 0.025 |
| Race | ||||
| Black | 273 (56%) | 231 (47%) | 201 (41%) | <.0001 |
| White | 217 (44%) | 260 (53%) | 289 (59%) | |
| Income | 0.88 | |||
| <$34k | 289 (67%) | 282 (66%) | 276 (65%) | |
| $35–74k | 109 (25%) | 117 (27%) | 115 (27%) | |
| $75k and above | 31 (7%) | 28 (7%) | 34 (8%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 253 (52%) | 232 (47%) | 231 (47%) | 0.29 |
| Hypertension | 427 (87%) | 411 (84%) | 416 (85%) | 0.31 |
| History of MI | 164 (34%) | 179 (37%) | 194 (40%) | 0.15 |
| History of stroke | 75 (15%) | 71 (15%) | 74 (15%) | 0.93 |
| Cancer | 69 (22%) | 78 (23%) | 54 (17%) | 0.094 |
| Current alcohol use | 163 (33%) | 172 (35%) | 196 (40%) | 0.21 |
| Cigarette smoking | <.0001 | |||
| Current | 67 (14%) | 60 (12%) | 113 (23%) | |
| Past | 199 (41%) | 227 (46%) | 197 (40%) | |
| Never | 223 (46%) | 203 (41%) | 178 (36%) | |
| ASA | 259 (53%) | 256 (52%) | 251 (51%) | 0.88 |
| Lipid-lowering Rx | 246 (51%) | 209 (43%) | 210 (43%) | 0.020 |
| Systolic BP, mm Hg | 137 (124–147) | 134 (123–146) | 134 (122–147) | 0.14 |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 78 (70–83) | 78 (70–82) | 78 (70–83) | 0.91 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 30 (26–34) | 29 (25–34) | 29 (25–35) | 0.39 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 102 (91–112) | 102 (91–112) | 102 (91–114) | 0.94 |
| LDL, mg/dl | 104 (80–127) | 101 (80–125) | 104 (83–128) | 0.48 |
| HDL, mg/dl | 45 (37–55) | 43 (35–54) | 43 (35–53) | 0.13 |
| TG, mg/dl | 124 (86–187) | 131 (91–192) | 139 (100–196) | 0.0050 |
| CRP, mg/l | 3.5 (1.6–7.4) | 3.4 (1.4–7.7) | 4.4 (1.7–9.4) | 0.0044 |
| ACR, mg/g | 94 (49–316) | 116 (56–410) | 136 (57–645) | 0.0006 |
| eGFRcyscr | 46 (34–54) | 45 (34–54) | 48 (37–57) | 0.0084 |
| eGFRcys | 40 (30–48) | 39 (29–47) | 41 (31–49) | 0.059 |
| eGFRcr | 52 (38–65) | 52 (38–64) | 56 (42–69) | 0.0029 |
ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ASA, aspirin; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFRcr, estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine; eGFRcys, estimated glomerular filtration rate cystatin; eGFRcyscr, estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine-cystatin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; KIM-1, kidney injury molecule−1; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; REGARDS, REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke; Rx, prescription; TG, triglyceride.
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).
Associations of urinary NGAL and KIM-1 with 2-year and 10-year progression to ESRD
| ESRD events | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGAL | ||||
| ESRD at 2-year follow-up | ||||
| NGAL T1 (reference) | 5/483 (1%) | |||
| NGAL T2 versus T1 | 14/484 (3%) | 3.25 (1.16–9.13) | 2.04 (0.73–5.71) | 1.19 (0.47–3.02) |
| NGAL T3 versus T1 | 37/484 (8%) | 10.66 (3.81–29.82) | 4.79 (1.65–13.88) | 1.84 (0.66–5.15) |
| NGAL (per doubling) | 56/1451 (4%) | 1.62 (1.43–1.83) | 1.45 (1.24–1.71) | 1.19 (0.99–1.42) |
| ESRD entire follow-up period | ||||
| NGAL T1 (reference) | 54/483 (11%) | |||
| NGAL T2 versus T1 | 95/484 (20%) | 2.36 (1.67–3.33) | 1.86 (1.29–2.68) | 1.41 (0.99–2.01) |
| NGAL T3 versus T1 | 108/484 (22%) | 2.91 (2.02–4.20) | 2.08 (1.43–3.02) | 1.30 (0.89–1.90) |
| NGAL (per doubling) | 257/1451 (18%) | 1.25 (1.17–1.34) | 1.18 (1.10–1.28) | 1.06 (0.98–1.14) |
CI, confidence interval; eGFRcr-cys, estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine-cystatin; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HR, hazard ratio; KIM-1, kidney injury molecule−1; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin, T1, tertile 1; T2, tertile 2; T3, tertile 3.
Model 1: Age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, urine creatinine.
Model 2: 1+ diabetes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, smoking, body mass index, alcohol use, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein.
Model 3: 2+ eGFRcr-cys.
Associations of urine NGAL and KIM-1 with 2-year and 10-year all-cause mortality
| Mortality events | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGAL | ||||
| Mortality at 2-year follow-up | ||||
| NGAL T1 (reference) | 39/490 (8%) | |||
| NGAL T2 versus T1 | 44/491 (9%) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.17) | 1.07 (0.68, 1.69) | 1.03 (0.65, 1.62) |
| NGAL T3 versus T1 | 67/491 (14%) | 2.45 (1.61, 3.72) | 1.73 (1.12, 2.68) | 1.60 (1.03, 2.49) |
| NGAL (per doubling) | 150/1472 (10%) | 1.20 (1.11, 1.29) | 1.13 (1.05, 1.23) | 1.12 (1.03, 1.21) |
| Mortality entire follow-up period | ||||
| NGAL T1 (reference) | 252/490 (51%) | |||
| NGAL T2 versus T1 | 285/491 (58%) | 1.33 (1.12, 1.58) | 1.17 (0.98, 1.40) | 1.12 (0.93, 1.33) |
| NGAL T3 versus T1 | 282/491 (57%) | 1.45 (1.21, 1.74) | 1.20 (1.00, 1.45) | 1.13 (0.94, 1.37) |
| NGAL (per doubling) | 819/1472 (56%) | 1.09 (1.05, 1.13) | 1.05 (1.02, 1.09) | 1.04 (1.00, 1.08) |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; KIM-1, kidney injury molecule−1; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin; T1, tertile 1; T2, tertile 2; T3, tertile 3.
Model 1: Age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, urine creatinine.
Model 2: 1+ diabetes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, smoking, body mass index, alcohol use, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein.
Model 3: 2+ eGFRcr-cys.
Figure 2Associations of neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule−1 (KIM-1) with risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality, overall and by time in REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants. Figure illustrates the associations of each biomarker with the outcomes ESRD and mortality during each 2-year time interval during the period of follow-up. The hazard ratios for ESRD and mortality appeared to be strongest in the first 2 years of follow-up, with a progressive weakening over time for both biomarkers. Hazard ratios are per doubling of urinary marker, using multivariable adjusted models controlling for demographics, socioeconomic status, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, smoking, body mass index, alcohol use, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine creatinine.
Figure 3Assessment of biomarker interactions for 10-year progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) are shown per doubling of kidney injury molecule−1 (KIM-1) and neutrophil gelatinase−associated lipocalin (NGAL) across the range of albumin-to-creatinine ratios (ACRs). Estimates are from Fine−Gray (ESRD) or Cox (Death) models, controlling for demographics, socioeconomic status (SES), diabetes mellitus (DM), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), hypertension (HTN), smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol use, ACR, C-reactive protein (CRP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine creatinine, plus interaction terms for KIM-1−by-ACR or NGAL-by-ACR. Figure illustrates the interactions of urinary ACR with each biomarker for the outcomes ESRD and mortality. HRs are per doubling of urinary marker, using multivariable adjusted models controlling for demographics, SES, DM, SBP, DBP, HTN, smoking, BMI, alcohol use, ACR, CRP, eGFR, and urine creatinine.