| Literature DB >> 30197658 |
Reza Taherian1,2, Sara Jalali-Farahani1,2, Mehrdad Karimi1,3, Parisa Amiri1, Emad Maghsoudi1, Parvin Mirmiran4, Fereidoun Azizi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pre-hypertension is proposed as an independent risk factor for the incidence of cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Iran; Life Style; Prehypertension; Risk Factor
Year: 2018 PMID: 30197658 PMCID: PMC6113714 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.59706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1726-913X
Figure 1.The structural model: Testing the association of socio-behavioral and biochemical factors with pre-hypertension. Age, employment and marital status and education are exogenous independent variables. Behavioral factors including physical activity and dietary patterns are mediators and affect cardio-metabolic risk factors. Cardio-metabolic risk factors as another set of mediators affect on pre-hypertension. Pre-hypertension status considered as final dependent variable. Abbreviations: FBS, fasting blood sugar; HDL, high density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
Descriptive Statistics of Respondents Based on the Presence of Pre-Hypertension by Sex Groups[a,b]
| Total (n = 4640) | Male (n = 2014) | Female (n = 2626) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non pre-hypertensive (N = 2998) | Pre-hypertensive (N = 1642) | P Value | Non pre-hypertensive (N = 1078) | Pre-hypertensive (N = 936) | P Value | Non pre-hypertensive (N = 1920) | Pre- hypertensive (N = 706) | P Value | |
|
| 36.63 ± 11.20 | 42.21 ± 12.92 | < 0.001 | 37.90 ± 12.13 | 42.05 ± 13.63 | <0.001 | 35.91 ± 10.59 | 42.43 ± 11.92 | < 0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| Elementary | 535 (57.8) | 391 (42.2) | < 0.001 | 199 (53.5) | 173 (64.5) | 0.15 | 336 (60.6) | 218 (39.4) | < 0.001 |
| Secondary school | 1422 (64.5) | 781 (35.5) | 486 (51.5) | 458 (48.5) | 936 (74.3) | 323 (25.7) | |||
| Undergraduate | 941 (70.1) | 401 (29.9) | 339 (57.3) | 253 (42.7) | 602 (80.3) | 148 (19.7) | |||
| Postgraduate degree | 99 (58.6) | 70 (41.4) | 54 (50.5) | 53 (49.5) | 45 (72.6) | 17 (27.4) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Single | 738 (72.1) | 286 (27.9) | < 0.001 | 326 (62.5) | 196 (37.5) | < 0.001 | 412 (82.1) | 90 (17.9) | < 0.001 |
| Married | 2259 (62.5) | 1357 (37.5) | 752 (50.4) | 741 (49.6) | 1507 (71.0) | 616 (29.0) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Unemployed | 1684 (65.5) | 776 (31.5) | < 0.001 | 199 (49.5) | 203 (50.5) | 0.07 | 1485 (72.2) | 573 (27.8) | 0.04 |
| Employed | 1313 (60.2) | 867 (39.8) | 879 (54.5) | 734 (45.5) | 434 (76.5) | 133 (23.5) | |||
|
| 5.08 ± 0.52 | 5.29 ± 0.61 | < 0.001 | 5.18 ± 0.56 | 5.35 ± 0.66 | < 0.001 | 5.02 ± 0.49 | 5.20 ± 0.53 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.30 ± 0.72 | 1.68 ± 0.89 | < 0.001 | 1.51 ± 0.85 | 1.83 ± 0.95 | < 0.001 | 1.18 ± 0.60 | 1.49 ± 0.76 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.88 ± 0.11 | 0.96 ± 0.11 | < 0.001 | 0.91 ± 0.10 | 0.97 ± 0.11 | <0.001 | 0.86 ± 0.11 | 0.93 ± 0.11 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.27 ± 0.29 | 1.19 ± 0.28 | < 0.001 | 1.12 ± 0.24 | 1.09 ± 0.23 | <0.001 | 1.36 ± 0.29 | 1.32 ± 0.29 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| No | 1439 (65.4) | 761 (34.6) | 0.38 | 494 (55.4) | 398 (44.6) | 0.47 | 945 (72.2) | 363 (27.8) | 0.17 |
| Q1 | 388 (63.7) | 221 (36.3) | 149 (51.4) | 141 (48.6) | 239 (74.9) | 80 (25.1) | |||
| Q2 | 429 (66.5) | 216 (33.5) | 158 (54.7) | 131 (45.3) | 271 (76.1) | 85 (23.9) | |||
| Q3 | 383 (62.5) | 230 (37.5) | 126 (51.9) | 117 (48.1) | 257 (69.5) | 113 (30.5) | |||
| Q4 | 358 (62.5) | 215 (37.5) | 151 (50.2) | 150 (49.8) | 207 (76.1) | 65 (23.9) | |||
Abbreviations: FBS, fasting blood sugar; HDL, high density lipoprotein, TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
aData represented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and N (%) for categorically distributed variables.
bP-values according to independent-sample t-test and χ2-test between non-pre-hypertensive and pre-hypertensive groups, P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2.Measurement model of healthy and poor dietary patterns: A CFA model based on 50% random sample data (n = 2320)
χ2 = 118.07, df = 33, χ2/df = 3.58, RMSEA = 0.033, RMR = 0.03, GFI = 0.99, CFI = 0.99, IFI = 0.97, NFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97. Fit indices of the CFA model display appropriateness of measurement model of dietary patterns. The standardized factor loadings and related t statistics to evaluate the explained variances of food groups reported on path ways. All factor loadings are significant for healthy and poor dietary patterns (p < 0.001). According to factor loadings, healthy dietary pattern is defined as higher vegetable (yellow, red, green and other vegetables), higher fruits, lower refined grain and lower rice/pasta. Poor dietary pattern explained by high intake of fast foods, fruit juice, organ meats, drinks and, salty snacks. Abbreviations: CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; RMR, root mean square residual; GFI, goodness of fit index; CFI, comparative fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; NFI, normed fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index.
Results of Structural Model: Sex Specific Associations Between Socio-Behavioral, Biochemical Factors and Pre-Hypertension[a]
| Response | Male | Female | Difference C.R# | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | C.R | Coefficient | C.R | ||
|
| |||||
| Age | -0.051 | -1.75 | 0.014 | 0.59 | 1.70 |
| Employment[ | -0.124 | -5.29** | -0.076 | -3.49** | 1.72 |
| Marital status[ | -0.163 | -5.70** | -0.068 | -3.13** | 2.44* |
| Education | -0.079 | 3.54** | 0.064 | 2.68* | -0.43 |
|
| |||||
| Age | 0.549 | 8.77** | 0.168 | 4.36** | -6.95** |
| Employment | -0.002 | -0.04 | -0.047 | -11.11** | -0.51 |
| Marital status | -0.071 | -1.50 | 0.027 | 1.39 | 1.77 |
| Education | 0.183 | 4.69** | 0.029 | 1.52 | -4.20** |
| Physical Activity[ | 0.213 | 4.90** | 0.100 | 3.78** | -3.52** |
|
| |||||
| Age | -0.502 | -10.05** | -0.393 | -11.11** | -0.31 |
| Employment | 0.091 | 3.40** | 0.002 | 4.36** | 1.03 |
| Marital status | 0.067 | 2.10* | 0.001 | 1.52 | -2.04* |
| Education | 0.052 | 2.10* | -0.009 | -0.45 | -1.78 |
| Physical activityc | -0.071 | -2.54* | 0.029 | 1.42 | 2.85** |
| HDL | |||||
| Age | 0.101 | 2.31* | 0.055 | 2.22* | -0.41 |
| Employment | -0.046 | -1.90 | 0.005 | 0.22 | 1.46 |
| Marital status | -0.140 | -4.73** | -0.052 | -2.40* | 1.63 |
| Education | 0.010 | 0.43 | 0.090 | 3.76** | 2.70** |
| Physical activity | 0.027 | 1.10 | 0.044 | 2.24* | 0.82 |
| Poor diet | -0.033 | -1.03 | -0.014 | -0.66 | 0.48 |
| Healthy diet | -0.077 | -1.58 | -0.010 | -0.59 | 0.76 |
|
| |||||
| Age | 0.008 | 0.18 | 0.290 | 3.53** | 6.83** |
| Employment | 0.031 | 1.29 | -0.025 | -1.33 | -1.84 |
| Marital status | 0.225 | 7.68** | 0.194 | 10.34** | 0.24 |
| Education | -0.051 | -2.11* | -0.160 | -7.76** | -3.88** |
| Physical activity | -0.023 | -0.92 | 0.021 | 1.28 | 1.50 |
| Poor diet | 0.130 | 3.84** | -0.016 | -0.88 | -3.82** |
| Healthy diet | 0.170 | 3.27** | 0.015 | 1.00 | -2.16* |
|
| |||||
| Age | 0.067 | 1.57 | 0.276 | 12.27** | 3.49** |
| Employment | 0.031 | 1.31 | -0.072 | -3.48** | -2.98** |
| Marital status | 0.184 | 6.31** | 0.062 | 3.00** | -3.98** |
| Education | 0.031 | 1.28 | -0.040 | -1.76 | -2.10* |
| Physical activity | -0.032 | -1.32 | -0.033 | -1.79 | 0.26 |
| Poor diet | 0.083 | 2.56* | 0.030 | 4.44** | -1.96 |
| Healthy diet | 0.008 | 0.17 | 0.040 | 2.39* | 1.00 |
|
| |||||
| Age | 0.290 | 6.89** | 0.316 | 14.19** | 0.17 |
| Employment | 0.025 | 1.05 | 0.001 | 0.05 | -0.83 |
| Marital status | 0.038 | 1.34 | 0.015 | 0.75 | -0.71 |
| Education | -0.021 | -0.91 | -0.096 | -4.29** | -2.04* |
| Physical activity | 0.006 | 0.26 | -0.001 | -0.45 | -0.29 |
| Poor diet | 0.062 | 1.98* | 0.065 | 7.53** | -0.50 |
| Healthy diet | 0.059 | 1.27 | -0.015 | -0.91 | -1.56 |
|
| |||||
| Age | 0.158 | 3.75** | 0.156 | 6.11** | 0.04 |
| Employment | -0.035 | -1.49 | 0.018 | 0.86 | 1.70 |
| Marital status | -0.038 | -1.31 | -0.064 | -3.05** | -0.73 |
| Education | 0.020 | 0.88 | 0.006 | 0.24 | -0.48 |
| HDL | 0.034 | 1.43 | 0.013 | 0.64 | -0.89 |
| WC | 0.245 | 10.27** | 0.213 | 9.35** | -2.31* |
| TG | 0.106 | 4.34** | 0.090 | 4.21** | 0.13 |
| FBS | 0.040 | 1.77 | 0.031 | 1.52 | -0.22 |
| Physical activity | 0.069 | 2.94** | -0.005 | -0.27 | -2.53* |
| Poor diet | 0.051 | 1.63 | 0.022 | 1.05 | -0.97 |
| Healthy diet | -0.018 | -0.38 | 0.015 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
Abbreviations: FBS, fasting blood sugar; HDL, high density lipoprotein;TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
a*Indicates P < 0.05, **Indicates P < 0.01, # Critical Ratio for Difference between males and females.
b Unemployed group was considered as reference group.
c Single group was considered as reference group.
d Correlation coefficient.
Figure 3.Final structural models in men (A) and women (B). The standardized effects of variables are presented on pathways for men and women. Abbreviations: HDL, high density lipoprotein; WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; FBS, fasting blood sugar.