Literature DB >> 30197451

General Chemistry Student Attitudes and Success with Use of Online Homework: Traditional-Responsive versus Adaptive-Responsive.

Michelle Richards-Babb1, Reagan Curtis2, Betsy Ratcliff1, Abhik Roy2, Taylor Mikalik2.   

Abstract

We investigated whether use of an adaptive-responsive online homework system (OHS) that tailors homework to students' prior knowledge and periodically reassesses students to promote learning through practice retrieval has inherent advantages over traditional-responsive online homework. A quasi-experimental cohort control post-test-only design with nonequivalent groups and propensity scores with nearest neighbor matching (n = 6,114 pairs) was used. The adaptive system was found to increase the odds of a higher final letter grade for average, below average, and failing students. However, despite the learning advantages, students self-reported less favorable attitudes toward adaptive-responsive (3.15 of 5) relative to traditional-responsive OHS (3.31). Specific to the adaptive OHS, the following were found: (i) student attitudes were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) to final letter grade, (ii) most students (95%) reported engaging in remediation of incorrect responses, (iii) a majority of students (69%) reported changes in study habits, and (iv) students recognized the benefit of using adaptive OHS by ranking its assignments and explanations or review materials as two of the top three most useful course aspects contributing to perceived learning. Instructors can use our findings to inform their choice of online homework system for formative assessment of chemistry learning by weighing the benefits, disadvantages, and learning pedagogies of traditional-responsive versus adaptive-responsive systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical Education Research; Enrichment/Review Materials; First-Year Undergraduate/General; Internet/Web-Based Learning; Testing/Assessment

Year:  2018        PMID: 30197451      PMCID: PMC6122603          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Educ        ISSN: 0021-9584            Impact factor:   2.979


  5 in total

1.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-05

2.  Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance.

Authors:  Michael Sheard
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2008-05-08

3.  Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students.

Authors:  Neal Schmitt; Jessica Keeney; Frederick L Oswald; Timothy J Pleskac; Abigail Q Billington; Ruchi Sinha; Mark Zorzie
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-11

4.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Student Perceptions of Online Homework Use for Formative Assessment of Learning in Organic Chemistry.

Authors:  Michelle Richards-Babb; Reagan Curtis; Zomitsa Georgieva; John H Penn
Journal:  J Chem Educ       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.979

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Does the Format of Preclass Reading Quizzes Matter? An Evaluation of Traditional and Gamified, Adaptive Preclass Reading Quizzes.

Authors:  Elena P Kolpikova; Derek C Chen; Jennifer H Doherty
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.325

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.