Literature DB >> 30197164

Comparison of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in terms of nutritional status or quality of life in early gastric cancer patients.

Ji Yeon Park1, Ki Bum Park1, Oh Kyoung Kwon2, Wansik Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) reconstructed by the double-tract method in comparison to those of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).
METHODS: A retrospective review of the prospectively established database identified early gastric cancer patients who underwent LPG (n = 34) or LTG (n = 46) between January 2011 and December 2015. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes including postoperative complications, changes in body composition, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL) after surgery were compared between the LPG and LTG patients.
RESULTS: Operating time was significantly longer in the LTG group (240.7 ± 43.9 vs. 211.7 ± 32.8 min, p = 0.007). The incidence of grade II or more complications and the hospital stay were comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of body composition using a bioelectrical impedance method in 1 year postoperatively. Nutritional status assessed by serum hemoglobin, iron, vitamin B12, albumin, total protein, and total cholesterol levels and postoperative changes in quality of life up to 2 years after surgery were also similar between the groups. Vitamin B12 supplementation was required in 75.4% of the patients in the LTG group and 46.5% in the LPG group within 2 years after surgery (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: LPG with double-tract reconstruction appears superior in preventing vitamin B12 deficiency compared to LTG, particularly after 1 year after the surgery, although it offered little benefit in terms of postoperative body composition changes and QOL.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-tract reconstruction; Early gastric cancer; Proximal gastrectomy; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30197164     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  20 in total

Review 1.  Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: individualization of resection with special considerations for Siewert type II, and Nishi types EG, E=G and GE cancers.

Authors:  Arnulf H Hölscher; Simon Law
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshiro Tanioka; Rawat Waratchanont; Ryosuke Fukuyo; Toshifumi Saito; Yuya Umebayashi; Emi Kanemoto; Kenta Kobayashi; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Mikito Inokuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparisons of Postoperative Complications and Nutritional Status After Proximal Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Esophagogastrostomy and Double-Tract Reconstruction.

Authors:  Wataru Miyauchi; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Takehiko Hanaki; Kyoichi Kihara; Manabu Yamamoto; Naruo Tokuyasu; Shuichi Takano; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Soichiro Honjo; Hiroaki Saito; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.641

4.  Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Tan; Meng-Ni Ran; Zi-Lin Liu; Ling-Han Tang; Zhou Ma; Zhou He; Zhou Xu; Fang-Han Li; Jiang-Wei Xiao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Clinical outcomes of gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Tetsuya Ito; Okihide Suzuki; Kyoichi Ogata; Youichi Kumagai; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A meta-analysis of comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shengnan Li; Lihu Gu; Zefeng Shen; Danyi Mao; Parikshit A Khadaroo; Hui Su
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Inhyeok Lee; Youjin Oh; Shin- Hoo Park; Yeongkeun Kwon; Sungsoo Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophia Kristina Rupp; Andreas Stengel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  Digestive tract reconstruction options after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Xiang Ma; Jing Yang; Jian-Ping Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 10.  Validation of a novel reconstruction method of laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Jie Gao; Yibo Wang; Yulin Tan; Cheng Xi; Nianyuan Ye; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.