Pamela B de Cordova1, Mary Beth Wilson Steck2, Amber Vermeesch3, Natacha Pierre4, Audra Rankin5, Jennifer M Ohlendorf6, Sherry Lawrence7, Anne Derouin8. 1. Division of Nursing Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, School of Nursing, Newark, New Jersey. 2. School of Nursing, Clemson University, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, South Carolina. 3. University of Portland, School of Nursing, Portland, Oregon. 4. University of Illinois-Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Marquette University College of Nursing, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 7. Adult Health Department, University of South Alabama, College of Nursing, Mobile, Alabama. 8. Maternal Child Division, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to understand how health policy education is currently being delivered in the United States' graduate nursing programs. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional design used an anonymous online survey to target graduate nursing students attending American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) member institutions. RESULTS: Over 75% of the sample (n = 140) reported taking a dedicated health policy course and 71.5% ( n = 131) of the sample responded that a health policy course was required and an equal distribution among master's and doctoral students. There was no significant difference between type of graduate degree sought and the requirement to take a health policy course ( P = 0.37). For students involved in health policy, there was a greater proportion of master's students involved at the state level, than doctorate of nursing practice (DNP) or PhD students ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Health policy and advocacy education are important aspects of graduate nursing curriculum and have been integrated into curricula. Graduate nursing students at all levels reported that health policy AACN Essential competencies are being included in their program, either as stand-alone health policy courses or integrated health policy learning activities during matriculation.
AIM: The aim was to understand how health policy education is currently being delivered in the United States' graduate nursing programs. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional design used an anonymous online survey to target graduate nursing students attending American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) member institutions. RESULTS: Over 75% of the sample (n = 140) reported taking a dedicated health policy course and 71.5% ( n = 131) of the sample responded that a health policy course was required and an equal distribution among master's and doctoral students. There was no significant difference between type of graduate degree sought and the requirement to take a health policy course ( P = 0.37). For students involved in health policy, there was a greater proportion of master's students involved at the state level, than doctorate of nursing practice (DNP) or PhD students ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Health policy and advocacy education are important aspects of graduate nursing curriculum and have been integrated into curricula. Graduate nursing students at all levels reported that health policy AACN Essential competencies are being included in their program, either as stand-alone health policy courses or integrated health policy learning activities during matriculation.